Page 22 of 119 results (0.012 seconds)

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 30%CPEs: 4EXPL: 1

The "go get" implementation in Go 1.9.4, when the -insecure command-line option is used, does not validate the import path (get/vcs.go only checks for "://" anywhere in the string), which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via a crafted web site. La implementación "go get" en Go 1.9.4, cuando se emplea la opción -insecure command-line, no valida la ruta de importación (get/vcs.go solo busca "://" en cualquier lugar de la cadena), lo que permite que atacantes remotos ejecuten comandos arbitrarios del sistema operativo mediante un sitio web manipulado. • https://gist.github.com/SLAYEROWNER/b2a358f13ab267f2e9543bb9f9320ffc https://github.com/golang/go/issues/23867 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/02/msg00029.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201804-12 https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4379 https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4380 • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 3%CPEs: 13EXPL: 28

Go before 1.8.7, Go 1.9.x before 1.9.4, and Go 1.10 pre-releases before Go 1.10rc2 allow "go get" remote command execution during source code build, by leveraging the gcc or clang plugin feature, because -fplugin= and -plugin= arguments were not blocked. Go, en versiones anteriores a la 1.8.7; Go en versiones 1.9.x anteriores a la 1.9.4 y los prelanzamientos de Go 1.10 anteriores a Go 1.10rc2 permiten la ejecución remota de comandos "go get" durante la construcción del código fuente aprovechando la característica del plugin gcc o clang debido a que los argumentos -fplugin= y -plugin= no se bloquearon. An arbitrary command execution flaw was found in the way Go's "go get" command handled gcc and clang sensitive options during the build. A remote attacker capable of hosting malicious repositories could potentially use this flaw to cause arbitrary command execution on the client side. • https://github.com/neargle/Go-Get-RCE-CVE-2018-6574-POC https://github.com/qweraqq/CVE-2018-6574 https://github.com/frozenkp/CVE-2018-6574 https://github.com/darthvader-htb/CVE-2018-6574 https://github.com/antunesmpedro/CVE-2018-6574 https://github.com/asavior2/CVE-2018-6574 https://github.com/Dannners/CVE-2018-6574-go-get-RCE https://github.com/jftierno/-CVE-2018-6574 https://github.com/ItsFadinG/CVE-2018-6574 https://github.com/OLAOLAOLA789/CVE-2018-6574 htt • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0

The net/http library in net/http/transfer.go in Go before 1.4.3 does not properly parse HTTP headers, which allows remote attackers to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks via a request with two Content-length headers. La biblioteca net/http en net/http/transfer.go en Go en versiones anteriores a la 1.4.3 no analiza sintácticamente cabeceras HTTP correctamente, lo que permite que atacantes remotos lleven a cabo ataques de contrabando de peticiones HTTP mediante una petición con dos cabeceras Content-length. HTTP-request vulnerabilities have been found in the Golang net/http and net/textproto libraries. Request headers with double Content-Length fields do not generate a 400 error (the second field is ignored), and invalid fields are parsed as valid (for example, "Content Length:" with a space in the middle is accepted). A non-authenticated attacker could exploit these flaws to bypass security controls, perform web-cache poisoning, or alter the request/response map (denial of service). • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/167997.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/168029.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1538.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q3/237 http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q3/292 http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q3/294 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250352 https://github.com/golang/go/commit/300d9a21583e7cf0149a778a0611e76ff7c6680f https://access.redhat.c • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0

The net/http library in net/textproto/reader.go in Go before 1.4.3 does not properly parse HTTP header keys, which allows remote attackers to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks via a space instead of a hyphen, as demonstrated by "Content Length" instead of "Content-Length." La biblioteca net/http en net/textproto/reader.go en Go en versiones anteriores a la 1.4.3 no analiza sintácticamente claves de cabecera HTTP correctamente, lo que permite que atacantes remotos lleven a cabo ataques de contrabando de peticiones HTTP mediante un espacio en lugar de un guión, tal y como se muestra en "Content Length", en lugar de "Content-Length". HTTP-request vulnerabilities have been found in the Golang net/http and net/textproto libraries. Request headers with double Content-Length fields do not generate a 400 error (the second field is ignored), and invalid fields are parsed as valid (for example, "Content Length:" with a space in the middle is accepted). A non-authenticated attacker could exploit these flaws to bypass security controls, perform web-cache poisoning, or alter the request/response map (denial of service). • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/167997.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-October/168029.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1538.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q3/237 http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q3/292 http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q3/294 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/76281 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250352 https://github.com/golang/go/commit/117ddcb83d7f42d • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

An unintended cleartext issue exists in Go before 1.8.4 and 1.9.x before 1.9.1. RFC 4954 requires that, during SMTP, the PLAIN auth scheme must only be used on network connections secured with TLS. The original implementation of smtp.PlainAuth in Go 1.0 enforced this requirement, and it was documented to do so. In 2013, upstream issue #5184, this was changed so that the server may decide whether PLAIN is acceptable. The result is that if you set up a man-in-the-middle SMTP server that doesn't advertise STARTTLS and does advertise that PLAIN auth is OK, the smtp.PlainAuth implementation sends the username and password. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101197 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3463 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0878 https://github.com/golang/go/issues/22134 https://golang.org/cl/68023 https://golang.org/cl/68210 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/golang-dev/RinSE3EiJBI/kYL7zb07AgAJ https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201710-23 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-15042 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498867 • CWE-300: Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information •