CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 1CVE-2022-27780
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-27780
The curl URL parser wrongly accepts percent-encoded URL separators like '/'when decoding the host name part of a URL, making it a *different* URL usingthe wrong host name when it is later retrieved.For example, a URL like `http://example.com%2F127.0.0.1/`, would be allowed bythe parser and get transposed into `http://example.com/127.0.0.1/`. This flawcan be used to circumvent filters, checks and more. El analizador de URLs de Curl acepta erróneamente separadores de URL codificados en porcentaje, como "/", cuando decodifica la parte del nombre del host de una URL, convirtiéndola en una URL *diferente* que usa un nombre de host incorrecto cuando es recuperado posteriormente. Por ejemplo, una URL como "http://example.com%2F127.0.0.1/", sería permitida por el analizador y sería transpuesta a "http://example.com/127.0.0.1/". Este fallo puede usarse para omitir filtros, comprobaciones y otras cosas • https://hackerone.com/reports/1553841 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202212-01 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220609-0009 • CWE-177: Improper Handling of URL Encoding (Hex Encoding) CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 17EXPL: 1CVE-2022-29155
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-29155
In OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.5.12 and 2.6.x before 2.6.2, a SQL injection vulnerability exists in the experimental back-sql backend to slapd, via a SQL statement within an LDAP query. This can occur during an LDAP search operation when the search filter is processed, due to a lack of proper escaping. En OpenLDAP versiones 2.x anteriores a 2.5.12 y versiones 2.6.x anteriores a 2.6.2, se presenta una vulnerabilidad de inyección SQL en el backend experimental back-sql de slapd, por medio de una sentencia SQL dentro de una consulta LDAP. Esto puede ocurrir durante una operación de búsqueda LDAP cuando es procesado el filtro de búsqueda, debido a una falta de escapes apropiados • https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9815 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00032.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220609-0007 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5140 • CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 43EXPL: 0CVE-2022-1434 – Incorrect MAC key used in the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-1434
The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key. This makes the MAC key trivially predictable. An attacker could exploit this issue by performing a man-in-the-middle attack to modify data being sent from one endpoint to an OpenSSL 3.0 recipient such that the modified data would still pass the MAC integrity check. Note that data sent from an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will always be rejected by the recipient and the connection will fail at that point. Many application protocols require data to be sent from the client to the server first. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=7d56a74a96828985db7354a55227a511615f732b https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009 https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 10%CPEs: 59EXPL: 5CVE-2022-1292 – The c_rehash script allows command injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-1292
The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). • https://github.com/alcaparra/CVE-2022-1292 https://github.com/li8u99/CVE-2022-1292 https://github.com/greek0x0/CVE-2022-1292 https://github.com/rama291041610/CVE-2022-1292 https://github.com/und3sc0n0c1d0/CVE-2022-1292 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=1ad73b4d27bd8c1b369a3cd453681d3a4f1bb9b2 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=548d3f280a6e737673f5b61fce24bb100108dfeb https://git • CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 43EXPL: 0CVE-2022-1343 – OCSP_basic_verify may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-1343
The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2eda98790c5c2741d76d23cc1e74b0dc4f4b391a https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009 https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1343 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087911 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •