Page 22 of 110 results (0.027 seconds)

CVSS: 7.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0

An infinite loop issue was found in the vhost_net kernel module in Linux Kernel up to and including v5.1-rc6, while handling incoming packets in handle_rx(). It could occur if one end sends packets faster than the other end can process them. A guest user, maybe remote one, could use this flaw to stall the vhost_net kernel thread, resulting in a DoS scenario. Se encontró un problema de bucle infinito en el módulo del núcleo vhost_net en el kernel de Linux versiones anteriores a 5.1-rc6 inclusive, mientras manejaba los paquetes entrantes en handle_rx(). Puede ocurrir cuando un extremo envía los paquetes más rápido de lo que el otro extremo los procesa. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155212/Slackware-Security-Advisory-Slackware-14.2-kernel-Updates.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108076 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1973 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2029 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2043 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3220 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3309 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3517 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3836 http • CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •

CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0

A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's vfio interface implementation that permits violation of the user's locked memory limit. If a device is bound to a vfio driver, such as vfio-pci, and the local attacker is administratively granted ownership of the device, it may cause a system memory exhaustion and thus a denial of service (DoS). Versions 3.10, 4.14 and 4.18 are vulnerable. Se encontró un fallo en la implementación de la interfaz vfio del kernel de Linux que permite la violación del límite de memoria bloqueada del usuario. Si un dispositivo está vinculado a un controlador vfio, como vfio-pci, y al atacante local se le otorga la propiedad del dispositivo, puede provocar un agotamiento de la memoria del sistema y, por lo tanto, una Denegación de Servicio( DoS) (DoS). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00037.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00043.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00071.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2029 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2043 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3309 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3517 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3882 https://l • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •

CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

A race condition in perf_event_open() allows local attackers to leak sensitive data from setuid programs. As no relevant locks (in particular the cred_guard_mutex) are held during the ptrace_may_access() call, it is possible for the specified target task to perform an execve() syscall with setuid execution before perf_event_alloc() actually attaches to it, allowing an attacker to bypass the ptrace_may_access() check and the perf_event_exit_task(current) call that is performed in install_exec_creds() during privileged execve() calls. This issue affects kernel versions before 4.8. Una condición de carrera en la función perf_event_open() permite a los atacantes locales filtrar datos confidenciales desde los programas setuid. Como no se mantienen bloqueos relevantes (en particular, la función cred_guard_mutex) durante la llamada ptrace_may_access(), es posible que la tarea de destino especificada realice un syscall execve() con la ejecución setuid anterior a que perf_event_alloc() realmente se conecte, permitiendo que un atacante omita la comprobación ptrace_may_access() y la llamada perf_event_exit_task(current) que se realiza en install_exec_creds() durante las llamadas privilegiadas execve(). • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/89937 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3901 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/05/msg00041.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/05/msg00042.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190517-0005 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-3901 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701245 • CWE-667: Improper Locking •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 180EXPL: 0

If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 28EXPL: 0

The process_open function in sftp-server.c in OpenSSH before 7.6 does not properly prevent write operations in readonly mode, which allows attackers to create zero-length files. La función process_open en sftp-server.c en OpenSSH, en versiones anteriores a la 7.6, no evita correctamente las operaciones de escritura en el modo readonly, lo que permite que los atacantes creen archivos de longitud cero. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101552 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0980 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672.pdf https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/a6981567e8e215acc1ef690c8dbb30f2d9b00a19 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00010.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201801-05 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180423-0004 https://www.openssh.com/txt/release-7.6 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html http • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-732: Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource •