Page 23 of 135 results (0.006 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

In GLPI before version 9.5.0, the encryption algorithm used is insecure. The security of the data encrypted relies on the password used, if a user sets a weak/predictable password, an attacker could decrypt data. This is fixed in version 9.5.0 by using a more secure encryption library. The library chosen is sodium. En GLPI versiones anteriores a 9.5.0, el algoritmo de cifrado usado no es seguro. • https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/commit/f1ae6c8481e5c19a6f1801a5548cada45702e01a#diff-b5d0ee8c97c7abd7e3fa29b9a27d1780 https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/security/advisories/GHSA-7xwm-4vjr-jvqh • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •

CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

In glpi before 9.5.1, there is a SQL injection for all usages of "Clone" feature. This has been fixed in 9.5.1. En glpi versiones anteriores a 9.5.1, se presenta una inyección SQL para todos los usos de la funcionalidad "Clone". Esto ha sido corregido en 9.5.1 • https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/commit/a4baa64114eb92fd2adf6056a36e0582324414ba https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/pull/6684 https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/security/advisories/GHSA-qv6w-68gq-wx2v • CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') •

CVSS: 9.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 2

In GLPI before 9.4.6, an attacker can execute system commands by abusing the backup functionality. Theoretically, this vulnerability can be exploited by an attacker without a valid account by using a CSRF. Due to the difficulty of the exploitation, the attack is only conceivable by an account having Maintenance privileges and the right to add WIFI networks. This is fixed in version 9.4.6. En GLPI versiones anteriores a 9.4.6, un atacante puede ejecutar comandos del sistema al abusar de la funcionalidad backup. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/49992 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51726 http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/163119/GLPI-9.4.5-Remote-Code-Execution.html https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/commit/ad748d59c94da177a3ed25111c453902396f320c https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/security/advisories/GHSA-cvvq-3fww-5v6f • CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •

CVSS: 6.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

In GLPI after 0.68.1 and before 9.4.6, multiple reflexive XSS occur in Dropdown endpoints due to an invalid Content-Type. This has been fixed in version 9.4.6. En GLPI versiones posteriores a 0.68.1 y anteriores a 9.4.6, se producen múltiples ataques de tipo XSS reflexivos en los endpoints Dropdown debido a un Content-Type no válido. Esto ha sido corregido en la versión 9.4.6. • https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/commit/5e1c52c5e8a30ceb4e9572964da7ed89ddfb1aaf https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/security/advisories/GHSA-3xxh-f5p2-jg3h • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •

CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 2

GLPI before before version 9.4.6 has a vulnerability involving a default encryption key. GLPIKEY is public and is used on every instance. This means anyone can decrypt sensitive data stored using this key. It is possible to change the key before installing GLPI. But on existing instances, data must be reencrypted with the new key. • https://github.com/indevi0us/CVE-2020-5248 https://github.com/Mkway/CVE-2020-5248 https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/commit/efd14468c92c4da43333aa9735e65fd20cbc7c6c https://github.com/glpi-project/glpi/security/advisories/GHSA-j222-j9mf-h6j9 • CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials •