Page 23 of 118 results (0.009 seconds)

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 67%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

The PE Loader service in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0 for Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003, and Vista allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors involving an "unchecked buffer" and unvalidated message lengths, probably a buffer overflow. El servicio PE Loader en Microsoft .NET Framework versiones 1.0, 1.1 y 2.0 para Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003 y Vista, permite a los atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario por medio de vectores no especificados que involucran un "unchecked buffer" y longitudes de mensajes sin invalidar, probablemente un desbordamiento de búfer. • http://archive.cert.uni-stuttgart.de/bugtraq/2007/07/msg00254.html http://osvdb.org/35954 http://secunia.com/advisories/26003 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/24778 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018356 http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA07-191A.html http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/2482 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2007/ms07-040 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34637 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repo • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 67%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

The Just In Time (JIT) Compiler service in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0 for Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003, and Vista allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors involving an "unchecked buffer," probably a buffer overflow, aka ".NET JIT Compiler Vulnerability". El servicio Just In Time (JIT) Compiler en Microsoft .NET Framework versiones 1.0, 1.1 y 2.0 para Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003 y Vista permite a los atacantes remotos asistidos por el usuario ejecutar código arbitrario por medio de vectores no específicos que involucran un "unchecked buffer," probablemente un desbordamiento de búfer, también se conoce como ".NET JIT Compiler Vulnerability ". • http://archive.cert.uni-stuttgart.de/bugtraq/2007/07/msg00254.html http://osvdb.org/35956 http://secunia.com/advisories/26003 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/24811 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018356 http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA07-191A.html http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/2482 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2007/ms07-040 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34639 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repo • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 92%CPEs: 7EXPL: 1

Interpretation conflict in ASP.NET in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0 for Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003, and Vista allows remote attackers to access configuration files and obtain sensitive information, and possibly bypass security mechanisms that try to constrain the final substring of a string, via %00 characters, related to use of %00 as a string terminator within POSIX functions but a data character within .NET strings, aka "Null Byte Termination Vulnerability." Un conflicto de interpretación en ASP.NET en Microsoft .NET Framework versión 1.0, 1.1 y 2.0 para Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003 y Vista permite que los atacantes remotos accedan a los archivos de configuración y obtengan información confidencial, y posiblemente omitan los mecanismos de seguridad que intentan restringir el acceso. La subcadena final de una cadena, por medio de caracteres %00 , relacionada con el uso de %00 como terminador de cadena dentro de las funciones POSIX pero un carácter data dentro de las cadenas .NET, también se conoce como "Null Byte Termination Vulnerability.". • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/30281 http://archive.cert.uni-stuttgart.de/bugtraq/2007/07/msg00254.html http://secunia.com/advisories/26003 http://security-assessment.com/files/advisories/2007-07-11_Multiple_.NET_Null_Byte_Injection_Vulnerabilities.pdf http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018356 http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA07-191A.html http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/2482 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2007/ms07-040 https&# • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 2%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0

Stack-based buffer overflow in the AfxOleSetEditMenu function in the MFC component in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2, and Server 2003 Gold and SP1, and Visual Studio .NET 2002 Gold and SP1, and 2003 Gold and SP1 allows user-assisted remote attackers to have an unknown impact (probably crash) via an RTF file with a malformed OLE object, which results in writing two 0x00 characters past the end of szBuffer, aka the "MFC42u.dll Off-by-Two Overflow." NOTE: this issue is due to an incomplete patch (MS07-012) for CVE-2007-0025. Desbordamiento de búfer basado en pila en la función AfxOleSetEditMenu en el componente MFC de Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2, y Server 2003 Gold y SP1, y Visual Studio .NET 2002 Gold y SP1, y 2003 Gold y SP1 permite a atacantes remotos con la complicidad del usuario tener un impacto desconocido (posiblemente caída) mediante un fichero RTF con un objeto OLE mal formado, lo cual resulta en la escritura de 2 caracteres 0x00 pasado el final de szBuffer, también conocido como "MFC42u.dll Off-by-Two Overflow". NOTA: este asunto es debido a un parche incompleto (MS07-012) para CVE-2007-0025. • http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/463009/100/0/threaded •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 62%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0

The MFC component in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2, and 2003 SP1 and Visual Studio .NET 2000, 2002 SP1, 2003, and 2003 SP1 allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an RTF file with a malformed OLE object that triggers memory corruption. NOTE: this might be due to a stack-based buffer overflow in the AfxOleSetEditMenu function in MFC42u.dll. El componente MFC en Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2 y 2003 SP1 y Visual Studio .NET 2000, 2002 SP1, 2003 y 2003 SP1 permite a atacantes remotos asistidos por usuario ejecutar código arbitrario a través de un archivo RTF con un objeto OLE mal formado que desencadena corrupción de memoria. NOTA: esto podría ser debido a un desbordamiento de buffer basado en pila en la función AfxOleSetEditMenu en MFC42u.dll. • http://secunia.com/advisories/24150 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/932041 http://www.osvdb.org/31887 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22476 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017638 http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA07-044A.html http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/0581 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2007/ms07-012 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A157 • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •