CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 3%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2016-7046 – undertow: Long URL proxy request lead to java.nio.BufferOverflowException and DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-7046
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7, when operating as a reverse-proxy with default buffer sizes, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU and disk consumption) via a long URL. Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7, cuando funciona como un proxy inverso con tamaños de búfer predeterminado, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de CPU y disco) a través de una URL larga. It was discovered that a long URL sent to EAP 7 Server operating as a reverse proxy with default buffer sizes causes a Denial of Service. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2640.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2641.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2642.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2657.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93173 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3454 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3455 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3456 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3458 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug&# • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •
CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 1%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4978 – Artemis: Deserialization of untrusted input vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4978
The getObject method of the javax.jms.ObjectMessage class in the (1) JMS Core client, (2) Artemis broker, and (3) Artemis REST component in Apache ActiveMQ Artemis before 1.4.0 might allow remote authenticated users with permission to send messages to the Artemis broker to deserialize arbitrary objects and execute arbitrary code by leveraging gadget classes being present on the Artemis classpath. El método getObject de la clase javax.jms.ObjectMessage en el (1) cliente JMS Core, (2) broker Artemis y (3) componente Artemis REST en Apache ActiveMQ Artemis en versiones anteriores a 1.4.0 podría permitir a usuarios remotos autenticados con permiso, mandar mensajes al broker Artemis para deserializar objetos arbitrarios y ejecutar código arbitrario aprovechando clases de gadget presentes en la ruta de clases Artemis. It was found that use of a JMS ObjectMessage does not safely handle user supplied data when deserializing objects. A remote attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the application using a JMS ObjectMessage. • http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/activemq-users/201609.mbox/%3CCAH6wpnqzeNtpykT7emtDU1-GV7AvjFP5-YroWcCC4UZyQEFvtA%40mail.gmail.com%3E http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93142 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1834 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1835 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1836 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1837 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3454 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3455 https://access.redhat& • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5406 – EAP7 Privilege escalation when managing domain including earlier version slaves
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5406
The domain controller in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7.x before 7.0.2 allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges by leveraging failure to propagate administrative RBAC configuration to all slaves. El controlador de dominios en Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.2 permite a usuarios remotos autenticados obtener privilegios aprovechando el fallo de propagación de configuración RBAC administrativa a todos los esclavos. The domain controller will not propagate its administrative RBAC configuration to some slaves. An attacker could use this to escalate their privileges. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1838.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1839.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1840.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1841.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3454 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3455 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3456 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3458 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359014 https://access.redhat.c • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4993 – eap: HTTP header injection / response splitting
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4993
CRLF injection vulnerability in the Undertow web server in WildFly 10.0.0, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7.x before 7.0.2, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. Vulnerabilidad de inyección CRLF en el servidor web Undertow en WildFly 10.0.0, tal como se utiliza en Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.2, permite a atacantes remotos inyectar cabeceras HTTP arbitrarias y llevar a cabo ataques de separación de respuesta HTTP a través de vectores no especificados. It was reported that EAP 7 Application Server/Undertow web server is vulnerable to the injection of arbitrary HTTP headers, and also response splitting, due to insufficient sanitization and validation of user input before the input is used as part of an HTTP header value. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1838.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1839.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1840.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1841.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92894 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036758 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3454 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3455 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3456 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017: • CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection') CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 45EXPL: 1CVE-2016-2183 – SSL/TLS: Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers (SWEET32)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2183
The DES and Triple DES ciphers, as used in the TLS, SSH, and IPSec protocols and other protocols and products, have a birthday bound of approximately four billion blocks, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTPS session using Triple DES in CBC mode, aka a "Sweet32" attack. Los cifrados DES y Triple DES, como se usan en los protocolos TLS, SSH e IPSec y otros protocolos y productos, tienen una cota de cumpleaños de aproximadamente cuatro mil millones de bloques, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos obtener datos de texto plano a través de un ataque de cumpleaños contra una sesión cifrada de larga duración, según lo demostrado por una sesión HTTPS usando Triple DES en modo CBC, también conocido como un ataque "Sweet32". A flaw was found in the way the DES/3DES cipher was used as part of the TLS/SSL protocol. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to recover some plaintext data by capturing large amounts of encrypted traffic between TLS/SSL server and client if the communication used a DES/3DES based ciphersuite. IBM Informix Dynamic Server suffers from dll injection, PHP code injection, and heap buffer overflow vulnerabilities. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00023.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00011.h • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •