CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 74%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5118 – ImageMagick: Remote code execution via filename
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5118
The OpenBlob function in blob.c in GraphicsMagick before 1.3.24 and ImageMagick allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a | (pipe) character at the start of a filename. La función OpenBlob en blob.c en GraphicsMagick en versiones anteriores a 1.3.24 y ImageMagick permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través del caractér | (tubería) en el inicio del nombre de archivo. It was discovered that ImageMagick did not properly sanitize certain input before using it to invoke processes. A remote attacker could create a specially crafted image that, when processed by an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities, would lead to arbitrary execution of shell commands with the privileges of the user running the application. • http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/commit/40639d173aa8c76b850d625c630b711fee4dcfb8 http://hg.code.sf.net/p/graphicsmagick/code/file/41876934e762/ChangeLog http://hg.code.sf.net/p/graphicsmagick/code/rev/ae3928faa858 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-06/msg00008.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-06/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-06/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-06/msg0002 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4448 – libxml2: Format string vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4448
Format string vulnerability in libxml2 before 2.9.4 allows attackers to have unspecified impact via format string specifiers in unknown vectors. Vulnerabilidad de formato de cadena en libxml2 en versiones anteriores a 2.9.4 permite a atacantes tener un impacto no especificado a través de especificadores de formato de cadena en vectores desconocidos. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00000.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00001.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00002.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00003.html http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00005.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2957.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/25/2 http://www • CWE-134: Use of Externally-Controlled Format String •
CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 56%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4553 – squid: Cache poisoning issue in HTTP Request handling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4553
client_side.cc in Squid before 3.5.18 and 4.x before 4.0.10 does not properly ignore the Host header when absolute-URI is provided, which allows remote attackers to conduct cache-poisoning attacks via an HTTP request. client_side.cc en Squid en versiones anteriores a 3.5.18 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.10 no ignora correctamente la cabecera Host cuando se proporciona una URI absoluta, lo que permite a atacantes remotos llevar a cabo ataques de envenenamiento de caché a través de una petición HTTP. An input validation flaw was found in the way Squid handled intercepted HTTP Request messages. An attacker could use this flaw to bypass the protection against issues related to CVE-2009-0801, and perform cache poisoning attacks on Squid. • http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4501 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035768 http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2016_7.txt http& • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 3%CPEs: 148EXPL: 1CVE-2016-4555 – squid: SegFault from ESIInclude::Start
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4555
client_side_request.cc in Squid 3.x before 3.5.18 and 4.x before 4.0.10 allows remote servers to cause a denial of service (crash) via crafted Edge Side Includes (ESI) responses. client_side_request.cc en Squid 3.x en versiones anteriores a 3.5.18 y 4.x en versiones anteriores a 4.0.10 permite a servidores remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída) a través de respuestas Edge Side Includes (ESI) manipuladas. A NULL pointer dereference flaw was found in the way Squid processes ESI responses. If Squid was used as a reverse proxy or for TLS/HTTPS interception, a malicious server could use this flaw to crash the Squid worker process. • http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4455 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/06/5 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linu • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4554 – squid: Header Smuggling issue in HTTP Request processing
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4554
mime_header.cc in Squid before 3.5.18 allows remote attackers to bypass intended same-origin restrictions and possibly conduct cache-poisoning attacks via a crafted HTTP Host header, aka a "header smuggling" issue. mime_header.cc en Squid en versiones anteriores a 3.5.18 permite a atacantes remotos eludir restricciones destinadas al mismo origen y posiblemente llevar a cabo ataques de envenenamiento de caché a través de una cabecera HTTP Host manipulada, también conocido como un problema "contrabando de peticiones". An input validation flaw was found in Squid's mime_get_header_field() function, which is used to search for headers within HTTP requests. An attacker could send an HTTP request from the client side with specially crafted header Host header that bypasses same-origin security protections, causing Squid operating as interception or reverse-proxy to contact the wrong origin server. It could also be used for cache poisoning for client not following RFC 7230. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-08/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-08/msg00069.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3625 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035769 http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2016_8.txt http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.1/changesets&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •