CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2019-14822 – ibus: missing authorization allows local attacker to access the input bus of another user
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-14822
A flaw was discovered in ibus in versions before 1.5.22 that allows any unprivileged user to monitor and send method calls to the ibus bus of another user due to a misconfiguration in the DBus server setup. A local attacker may use this flaw to intercept all keystrokes of a victim user who is using the graphical interface, change the input method engine, or modify other input related configurations of the victim user. Se detecto un fallo en el ibus en las versiones anteriores a la 1.5.22 que permite a cualquier usuario sin privilegios supervisar y enviar llamadas de método al bus ibus de otro usuario debido a una configuración errónea en la configuración del servidor DBus. Un atacante local puede utilizar este fallo para interceptar todas las pulsaciones de teclas de un usuario víctima que esté utilizando la interfaz gráfica, cambiar el motor del método de entrada o modificar otras configuraciones relacionadas con la entrada del usuario víctima A flaw was discovered in ibus that allows any unprivileged user to monitor and send method calls to the ibus bus of another user due to a misconfiguration in the DBus server setup. A local attacker may use this flaw to intercept all keystrokes of a victim user who is using the graphical interface, change the input method engine, or modify other input related configurations of the victim user. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1717958 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-14822 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4134-3 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-14822 • CWE-862: Missing Authorization •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0CVE-2019-16168 – sqlite: Division by zero in whereLoopAddBtreeIndex in sqlite3.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-16168
In SQLite through 3.29.0, whereLoopAddBtreeIndex in sqlite3.c can crash a browser or other application because of missing validation of a sqlite_stat1 sz field, aka a "severe division by zero in the query planner." En SQLite versiones hasta 3.29.0, la función whereLoopAddBtreeIndex en el archivo sqlite3.c puede bloquear un navegador u otra aplicación debido a la falta de comprobación de un campo sqlite_stat1 sz, también se conoce como "severe division by zero in the query planner.". • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00033.html https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00037.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XZARJHJJDBHI7CE5PZEBXS5HKK6HXKW2 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-16 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190926-0003 https:/& • CWE-369: Divide By Zero •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 28EXPL: 0CVE-2019-16056 – python: email.utils.parseaddr wrongly parses email addresses
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-16056
An issue was discovered in Python through 2.7.16, 3.x through 3.5.7, 3.6.x through 3.6.9, and 3.7.x through 3.7.4. The email module wrongly parses email addresses that contain multiple @ characters. An application that uses the email module and implements some kind of checks on the From/To headers of a message could be tricked into accepting an email address that should be denied. An attack may be the same as in CVE-2019-11340; however, this CVE applies to Python more generally. Se descubrió un problema en Python versiones hasta 2.7.16, versiones 3.x hasta 3.5.7, versiones 3.6.x hasta 3.6.9 y versiones 3.7.x hasta 3.7.4. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00062.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00063.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00012.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00040.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3725 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3948 https://bugs.python.org/issue • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0CVE-2019-13565
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-13565
An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48. When using SASL authentication and session encryption, and relying on the SASL security layers in slapd access controls, it is possible to obtain access that would otherwise be denied via a simple bind for any identity covered in those ACLs. After the first SASL bind is completed, the sasl_ssf value is retained for all new non-SASL connections. Depending on the ACL configuration, this can affect different types of operations (searches, modifications, etc.). In other words, a successful authorization step completed by one user affects the authorization requirement for a different user. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00053.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00058.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Dec/26 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1b103833cb5bc8466e24ff0ecc5e75b45a705334ab6a444e64e840a0%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues. •
CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0CVE-2019-13057
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-13057
An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When the server administrator delegates rootDN (database admin) privileges for certain databases but wants to maintain isolation (e.g., for multi-tenant deployments), slapd does not properly stop a rootDN from requesting authorization as an identity from another database during a SASL bind or with a proxyAuthz (RFC 4370) control. (It is not a common configuration to deploy a system where the server administrator and a DB administrator enjoy different levels of trust.) Se detectó un problema en el servidor en OpenLDAP anterior a versión 2.4.48. Cuando el administrador del servidor delega los privilegios de tipo rootDN (administrador de base de datos) para ciertas bases de datos, pero quiere mantener el aislamiento (por ejemplo, para implementaciones de múltiples inquilinos), slapd no detiene apropiadamente un rootDN de solicitar una autorización como una identidad de otra base de datos durante un enlace SASL o con un control proxyAuthz (RFC 4370). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00053.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00058.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Dec/26 https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/08/msg00024.html https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/23 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190822-0004 https://support.apple.com/kb/HT210788 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4 •