CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2015-2126
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-2126
Unspecified vulnerability in pppoec in HP HP-UX 11iv2 and 11iv3 allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging setuid permissions. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en pppoec en HP HP-UX 11iv2 y 11iv3 permite a usuarios locales ganar privilegios mediante el aprovechamiento de permisos setuid. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75462 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032746 https://h20564.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c04718530 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVSS: 4.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3317
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3317
CA Common Services, as used in CA Client Automation r12.5 SP01, r12.8, and r12.9; CA Network and Systems Management r11.0, r11.1, and r11.2; CA NSM Job Management Option r11.0, r11.1, and r11.2; CA Universal Job Management Agent; CA Virtual Assurance for Infrastructure Managers (aka SystemEDGE) 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, and 12.9; and CA Workload Automation AE r11, r11.3, r11.3.5, and r11.3.6 on UNIX, does not properly perform bounds checking, which allows local users to gain privileges via unspecified vectors. CA Common Services, utilizado en CA Client Automation r12.5 SP01, r12.8, y r12.9; CA Network and Systems Management r11.0, r11.1, y r11.2; CA NSM Job Management Option r11.0, r11.1, y r11.2; CA Universal Job Management Agent; CA Virtual Assurance for Infrastructure Managers (también conocido como SystemEDGE) 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, y 12.9; y CA Workload Automation AE r11, r11.3, r11.3.5, y r11.3.6 en UNIX, no realiza correctamente la comprobación de límites, lo que permite a usuarios locales ganar privilegios a través de vectores no especificados. • http://www.ca.com/us/support/ca-support-online/product-content/recommended-reading/security-notices/ca20150604-01-security-notice-for-ca-common-services.aspx http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75033 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032512 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032513 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 4.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3318
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3318
CA Common Services, as used in CA Client Automation r12.5 SP01, r12.8, and r12.9; CA Network and Systems Management r11.0, r11.1, and r11.2; CA NSM Job Management Option r11.0, r11.1, and r11.2; CA Universal Job Management Agent; CA Virtual Assurance for Infrastructure Managers (aka SystemEDGE) 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, and 12.9; and CA Workload Automation AE r11, r11.3, r11.3.5, and r11.3.6 on UNIX, does not properly validate an unspecified variable, which allows local users to gain privileges via unknown vectors. CA Common Services, utilizado en CA Client Automation r12.5 SP01, r12.8, y r12.9; CA Network and Systems Management r11.0, r11.1, y r11.2; CA NSM Job Management Option r11.0, r11.1, y r11.2; CA Universal Job Management Agent; CA Virtual Assurance for Infrastructure Managers (también conocido como SystemEDGE) 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, y 12.9; y CA Workload Automation AE r11, r11.3, r11.3.5, y r11.3.6 en UNIX, no valida correctamente una variable no especificada, lo que permite a usuarios locales ganar privilegios a través de vectores desconocidos. • http://www.ca.com/us/support/ca-support-online/product-content/recommended-reading/security-notices/ca20150604-01-security-notice-for-ca-common-services.aspx http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75033 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032512 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032513 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 4.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 21EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3316
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3316
CA Common Services, as used in CA Client Automation r12.5 SP01, r12.8, and r12.9; CA Network and Systems Management r11.0, r11.1, and r11.2; CA NSM Job Management Option r11.0, r11.1, and r11.2; CA Universal Job Management Agent; CA Virtual Assurance for Infrastructure Managers (aka SystemEDGE) 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, and 12.9; and CA Workload Automation AE r11, r11.3, r11.3.5, and r11.3.6 on UNIX, allows local users to gain privileges via an unspecified environment variable. CA Common Services, utilizado en CA Client Automation r12.5 SP01, r12.8, y r12.9; CA Network and Systems Management r11.0, r11.1, y r11.2; CA NSM Job Management Option r11.0, r11.1, y r11.2; CA Universal Job Management Agent; CA Virtual Assurance for Infrastructure Managers (también conocido como SystemEDGE) 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, y 12.9; y CA Workload Automation AE r11, r11.3, r11.3.5, y r11.3.6 en UNIX, permite a usuarios locales ganar privilegios a través de una variable de entorno no especificada. • http://www.ca.com/us/support/ca-support-online/product-content/recommended-reading/security-notices/ca20150604-01-security-notice-for-ca-common-services.aspx http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75033 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032512 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032513 •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 97%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2015-4000 – LOGJAM: TLS connections which support export grade DHE key-exchange are vulnerable to MITM attacks
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-4000
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. El protocolo TLS 1.2 y anteriores, cuando una suite de cifrado DHE_EXPORT está habilitada en un servidor pero no en un cliente, no transporta una elección DHE_EXPORT, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle realizar ataques de degradación del cifrado mediante la rescritura de un ClientHello con DHE remplazado por DHE_EXPORT y posteriormente la rescritura de un ServerHello con DHE_EXPORT remplazado por DHE, también conocido como el problema 'Logjam'. A flaw was found in the way the TLS protocol composes the Diffie-Hellman exchange (for both export and non-export grade cipher suites). An attacker could use this flaw to downgrade a DHE connection to use export-grade key sizes, which could then be broken by sufficient pre-computation. This can lead to a passive man-in-the-middle attack in which the attacker is able to decrypt all traffic. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/sendmail_advisory2.asc http://fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-07-09-cve-2015-1793-openssl-alternative-chains-certificate-forgery http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04876402 http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04949778 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10681 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoC • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •