CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0CVE-2021-2342 – mysql: Server: Optimizer unspecified vulnerability (CPU Jul 2021)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-2342
Vulnerability in the MySQL Server product of Oracle MySQL (component: Server: Optimizer). Supported versions that are affected are 5.7.34 and prior and 8.0.25 and prior. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of MySQL Server. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.9 (Availability impacts). • https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6OO2Q5PIFURXLLKCIJE6XF6VL4LLMNO5 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OPJAGVMRKODR4QIXQSVEM4BLRZUM7P3R https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210723-0001 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2021.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-2342 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992294 •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 35EXPL: 1CVE-2021-22897
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-22897
curl 7.61.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from exposure of data element to wrong session due to a mistake in the code for CURLOPT_SSL_CIPHER_LIST when libcurl is built to use the Schannel TLS library. The selected cipher set was stored in a single "static" variable in the library, which has the surprising side-effect that if an application sets up multiple concurrent transfers, the last one that sets the ciphers will accidentally control the set used by all transfers. In a worst-case scenario, this weakens transport security significantly. curl versiones 7.61.0 hasta 7.76.1, sufre de exposición de un elemento de datos a una sesión equivocada debido a un error en el código para la función CURLOPT_SSL_CIPHER_LIST cuando libcurl es construído para usar la biblioteca TLS de Schannel. El ajuste de cifrado seleccionado se almacenaba en una única variable "static" en la biblioteca, lo que tiene el sorprendente efecto secundario de que si una aplicación establece múltiples transferencias concurrentes, la última que ajusta los cifrados controlará accidentalmente el ajuste usado por todas las transferencias. En el peor de los casos, esto debilita significativamente la seguridad del transporte • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2021-22897.html https://github.com/curl/curl/commit/bbb71507b7bab52002f9b1e0880bed6a32834511 https://hackerone.com/reports/1172857 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210727-0007 https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html • CWE-668: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere CWE-840: Business Logic Errors •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 10%CPEs: 40EXPL: 2CVE-2021-22901 – curl: Use-after-free in TLS session handling when using OpenSSL TLS backend
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-22901
curl 7.75.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from a use-after-free vulnerability resulting in already freed memory being used when a TLS 1.3 session ticket arrives over a connection. A malicious server can use this in rare unfortunate circumstances to potentially reach remote code execution in the client. When libcurl at run-time sets up support for TLS 1.3 session tickets on a connection using OpenSSL, it stores pointers to the transfer in-memory object for later retrieval when a session ticket arrives. If the connection is used by multiple transfers (like with a reused HTTP/1.1 connection or multiplexed HTTP/2 connection) that first transfer object might be freed before the new session is established on that connection and then the function will access a memory buffer that might be freed. When using that memory, libcurl might even call a function pointer in the object, making it possible for a remote code execution if the server could somehow manage to get crafted memory content into the correct place in memory. curl versiones 7.75.0 hasta 7.76.1 sufre de una vulnerabilidad de uso de la memoria previamente liberada que resulta en el uso de memoria ya liberada cuando un ticket de sesión TLS 1.3 llega a través de una conexión. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-732250.pdf https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2021-22901.html https://github.com/curl/curl/commit/7f4a9a9b2a49547eae24d2e19bc5c346e9026479 https://hackerone.com/reports/1180380 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210723-0001 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210727-0007 https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022. • CWE-416: Use After Free •
CVSS: 3.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 18EXPL: 2CVE-2021-22898 – curl: TELNET stack contents disclosure
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-22898
curl 7.7 through 7.76.1 suffers from an information disclosure when the `-t` command line option, known as `CURLOPT_TELNETOPTIONS` in libcurl, is used to send variable=content pairs to TELNET servers. Due to a flaw in the option parser for sending NEW_ENV variables, libcurl could be made to pass on uninitialized data from a stack based buffer to the server, resulting in potentially revealing sensitive internal information to the server using a clear-text network protocol. curl versiones 7.7 hasta 7.76.1 sufre de una divulgacion de información cuando la opción de línea de comandos "-t", conocida como "CURLOPT_TELNETOPTIONS" en libcurl, se usa para enviar pares de variables=contenido a servidores TELNET. Debido a un fallo en el analizador de opciones para el envío de variables NEW_ENV, podría hacer que libcurl pasara datos no inicializados de un búfer basado en la pila al servidor, resultando en una potencial divulgación de información interna confidencial al servidor que usaba un protocolo de red de texto sin cifrar A flaw was found in the way curl handled telnet protocol option for sending environment variables, which could lead to sending of uninitialized data from a stack-based buffer to the server. This issue leads to potentially revealing sensitive internal information to the server using a clear-text network protocol. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/07/21/4 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2021-22898.html https://github.com/curl/curl/commit/39ce47f219b09c380b81f89fe54ac586c8db6bde https://hackerone.com/reports/1176461 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc713534b10f9daeee2e0990239fa407e2118e4aa9e88a7041177497c%40%3Cissues.guacamole.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/08/msg00017.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-ann • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-908: Use of Uninitialized Resource CWE-909: Missing Initialization of Resource •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0CVE-2021-3450 – CA certificate check bypass with X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3450
The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2a40b7bc7b94dd7de897a74571e7024f0cf0d63b https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44845 https://kc.mc • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •