Page 26 of 159 results (0.070 seconds)

CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

An attacker who compromised a content process could have partially escaped the sandbox to read arbitrary files via clipboard-related IPC messages.<br>*This bug only affects Thunderbird for Linux. Other operating systems are unaffected.*. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 108, Firefox ESR < 102.6, and Thunderbird < 102.6. The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: An attacker who compromised a content process could have partially escaped the sandbox to read arbitrary files via clipboard-related IPC messages. *This bug only affects Firefox for Linux. • https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1799156 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202305-06 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202305-13 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-51 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-52 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-53 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-46872 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153441 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

Mozilla developers Randell Jesup, Valentin Gosu, Olli Pettay, and the Mozilla Fuzzing Team reported memory safety bugs present in Thunderbird 102.5. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 108, Firefox ESR < 102.6, and Thunderbird < 102.6. The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: Mozilla developers Randell Jesup, Valentin Gosu, Olli Pettay, and the Mozilla Fuzzing Team reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 107 and Firefox ESR 102.5. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. • https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1782219%2C1797370%2C1797685%2C1801102%2C1801315%2C1802395 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202305-06 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202305-13 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-51 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-52 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-53 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-46878 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153454 • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

Through a series of popups that reuse windowName, an attacker can cause a window to go fullscreen without the user seeing the notification prompt, resulting in potential user confusion or spoofing attacks. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 102.5, Thunderbird < 102.5, and Firefox < 107. A través de una serie de ventanas emergentes que reutilizan el nombre de la ventana, un atacante puede hacer que una ventana pase a pantalla completa sin que el usuario vea el mensaje de notificación, lo que genera una posible confusión del usuario o ataques de suplantación de identidad. Esta vulnerabilidad afecta a Firefox ESR &lt; 102,5, Thunderbird &lt; 102.5 y Firefox &lt; 107. The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: Through a series of popups that reuse windowName, an attacker can cause a window to go fullscreen without the user seeing the notification prompt, resulting in potential user confusion or spoofing attacks. • https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1793829 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-47 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-48 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-49 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-45408 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143201 • CWE-1021: Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames •

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

If a custom mouse cursor is specified in CSS, under certain circumstances the cursor could have been drawn over the browser UI, resulting in potential user confusion or spoofing attacks. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 102.5, Thunderbird < 102.5, and Firefox < 107. Si se especifica un cursor de mouse personalizado en CSS, bajo ciertas circunstancias el cursor podría haberse dibujado sobre la interfaz de usuario del navegador, lo que podría generar confusión en el usuario o ataques de suplantación de identidad. Esta vulnerabilidad afecta a Firefox ESR &lt; 102,5, Thunderbird &lt; 102.5 y Firefox &lt; 107. The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: If a custom mouse cursor is specified in CSS, under certain circumstances the cursor could have been drawn over the browser UI, resulting in potential user confusion or spoofing attacks. • https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1795815 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-47 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-48 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-49 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-45418 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143241 • CWE-1021: Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

Service Workers should not be able to infer information about opaque cross-origin responses; but timing information for cross-origin media combined with Range requests might have allowed them to determine the presence or length of a media file. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 102.5, Thunderbird < 102.5, and Firefox < 107. Los trabajadores de servicios no deberían poder inferir información sobre respuestas opacas de origen cruzado; pero la información de tiempo para medios de distintos orígenes combinada con solicitudes de rango podría haberles permitido determinar la presencia o la longitud de un archivo multimedia. Esta vulnerabilidad afecta a Firefox ESR &lt; 102,5, Thunderbird &lt; 102.5 y Firefox &lt; 107. The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: Service Workers should not be able to infer information about opaque cross-origin responses; but timing information for cross-origin media combined with Range requests might have allowed them to determine the presence or length of a media file. • https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1762078 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-47 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-48 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-49 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-45403 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143197 • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-829: Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere •