CVE-2017-5645 – log4j: Socket receiver deserialization vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-5645
In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. En Apache Log4j 2.x en versiones anteriores a 2.8.2, cuando se utiliza el servidor de socket TCP o el servidor de socket UDP para recibir sucesos de registro serializados de otra aplicación, puede enviarse una carga binaria especialmente diseñada que, cuando se deserializa, puede ejecutar código arbitrario. It was found that when using remote logging with log4j socket server the log4j server would deserialize any log event received via TCP or UDP. An attacker could use this flaw to send a specially crafted log event that, during deserialization, would execute arbitrary code in the context of the logger application. • https://github.com/pimps/CVE-2017-5645 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/19/2 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97702 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040200 http://www.securit • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVE-2017-3136 – An error handling synthesized records could cause an assertion failure when using DNS64 with "break-dnssec yes;"
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-3136
A query with a specific set of characteristics could cause a server using DNS64 to encounter an assertion failure and terminate. An attacker could deliberately construct a query, enabling denial-of-service against a server if it was configured to use the DNS64 feature and other preconditions were met. Affects BIND 9.8.0 -> 9.8.8-P1, 9.9.0 -> 9.9.9-P6, 9.9.10b1->9.9.10rc1, 9.10.0 -> 9.10.4-P6, 9.10.5b1->9.10.5rc1, 9.11.0 -> 9.11.0-P3, 9.11.1b1->9.11.1rc1, 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.9.9-S8. Una consulta con un conjunto determinado de características podría provocar que un servidor que emplea DNS64 se encuentre con un fallo de aserción y termine. Un atacante podría construir deliberadamente una consulta, habilitando una denegación de servicio (DoS) contra un servidor si está configurado para emplear la característica DNS64 y se cumplen otras precondiciones. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00044.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97653 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038259 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1095 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1105 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbux03747en_us https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01465 https://security.gentoo. • CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVE-2017-3137 – A response packet can cause a resolver to terminate when processing an answer containing a CNAME or DNAME
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-3137
Mistaken assumptions about the ordering of records in the answer section of a response containing CNAME or DNAME resource records could lead to a situation in which named would exit with an assertion failure when processing a response in which records occurred in an unusual order. Affects BIND 9.9.9-P6, 9.9.10b1->9.9.10rc1, 9.10.4-P6, 9.10.5b1->9.10.5rc1, 9.11.0-P3, 9.11.1b1->9.11.1rc1, and 9.9.9-S8. Las asunciones equivocadas sobre el orden de los registros en la sección de respuesta de una respuesta que contiene registros de recursos CNAME o DNAME podría conducir a una situación en la que named se cerraría con un fallo de aserción al procesar una respuesta en la que los registros ocurrieron en un orden inusual. Afecta a BIND en versiones 9.9.9-P6, desde la versión 9.9.10b1 hasta la 9.9.10rc1, la versión 9.10.4-P6, desde la versión 9.10.5b1 hasta la 9.10.5rc1, la versión 9.11.0-P3, desde la versión 9.11.1b1 hasta la 9.11.1rc1 y en la versión 9.9.9-S8. A denial of service flaw was found in the way BIND handled a query response containing CNAME or DNAME resource records in an unusual order. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97651 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038258 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040195 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1095 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1105 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1582 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1583 https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01466 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201708-01 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180802-0002 https://www.debian.org& • CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVE-2016-9573 – openjpeg: heap out-of-bounds read due to insufficient check in imagetopnm()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-9573
An out-of-bounds read vulnerability was found in OpenJPEG 2.1.2, in the j2k_to_image tool. Converting a specially crafted JPEG2000 file to another format could cause the application to crash or, potentially, disclose some data from the heap. Se ha detectado una vulnerabilidad de lectura fuera de límites en OpenJPEG 2.1.2, en la herramienta j2k_to_image. La conversión de un archivo JPEG2000 especialmente manipulado a otro formato podría provocar que la aplicación se cierre inesperadamente o, potencialmente, revele algunos datos de la memoria dinámica (heap). An out-of-bounds read vulnerability was found in OpenJPEG, in the j2k_to_image tool. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0838.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97073 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-9573 https://github.com/szukw000/openjpeg/commit/7b28bd2b723df6be09fe7791eba33147c1c47d0d https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/862 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201710-26 https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3768 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9573 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402711 • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •
CVE-2017-2616 – util-linux: Sending SIGKILL to other processes with root privileges via su
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-2616
A race condition was found in util-linux before 2.32.1 in the way su handled the management of child processes. A local authenticated attacker could use this flaw to kill other processes with root privileges under specific conditions. Se ha encontrado una condición de carrera en util-linux en versiones anteriores a la 2.32.1 en la forma en la que "su" manejaba los procesos hijo. Un atacante local autenticado podría usar este defecto para matar otros procesos con privilegios de root bajo condiciones específicas. A race condition was found in the way su handled the management of child processes. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0654.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96404 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038271 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0907 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-2616 https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/commit/dffab154d29a288aa171ff50263ecc8f2e14a891 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201706-02 https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3793 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-2616 https://bugzilla.r • CWE-267: Privilege Defined With Unsafe Actions CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •