Page 26 of 1366 results (0.013 seconds)

CVSS: 9.0EPSS: 27%CPEs: 47EXPL: 21

In Sudo before 1.8.28, an attacker with access to a Runas ALL sudoer account can bypass certain policy blacklists and session PAM modules, and can cause incorrect logging, by invoking sudo with a crafted user ID. For example, this allows bypass of !root configuration, and USER= logging, for a "sudo -u \#$((0xffffffff))" command. En Sudo anteriores a 1.8.28, un atacante con acceso a una cuenta Runas ALL sudoer puede omitir ciertas listas negras de políticas y módulos PAM de sesión, y puede causar un registro incorrecto, mediante la invocación sudo con un ID de usuario creado. Por ejemplo, esto permite la omisión de la configuración root y el registro USER= para un comando "sudo -u \#$((0xffffffff))". • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/47502 https://github.com/n0w4n/CVE-2019-14287 https://github.com/shallvhack/Sudo-Security-Bypass-CVE-2019-14287 https://github.com/CMNatic/Dockerized-CVE-2019-14287 https://github.com/axax002/sudo-vulnerability-CVE-2019-14287 https://github.com/N3rdyN3xus/CVE-2019-14287 https://github.com/DewmiApsara/CVE-2019-14287 https://github.com/MariliaMeira/CVE-2019-14287 https://github.com/edsonjt81/CVE-2019-14287- https://github.com/SachinthaDeSilva-cmd& • CWE-267: Privilege Defined With Unsafe Actions CWE-755: Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions •

CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 32EXPL: 1

A flaw was found in the "Leaf and Chain" OCSP policy implementation in JSS' CryptoManager versions after 4.4.6, 4.5.3, 4.6.0, where it implicitly trusted the root certificate of a certificate chain. Applications using this policy may not properly verify the chain and could be vulnerable to attacks such as Man in the Middle. Se detectó un fallo en la implementación de la política OCSP "Leaf and Chain" en las versiones de CryptoManager de JSS versiones posteriores a 4.4.6, 4.5.3, 4.6.0, donde confiaba implícitamente en el certificado raíz de una cadena de certificados. Es posible que las aplicaciones que utilizan esta política no verifiquen correctamente la cadena y puedan ser vulnerables a ataques de tipo Man in the Middle. A flaw was found in the "Leaf and Chain" OCSP policy implementation in JSS' CryptoManager, where it implicitly trusted the root certificate of a certificate chain. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3067 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3225 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-14823 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ENEN4DQBE6WOGEP5BQ5X62WZM7ZQEEBG https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/O53NXVKMF7PJCPMCJQHLMSYCUGDHGBVE https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UZZWZLNALV6AOIBIHB3ZMNA5AGZMZAIY https:& • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation CWE-358: Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 41EXPL: 0

A vulnerability was found in WebKit. The flaw is triggered when processing maliciously crafted web content that may lead to arbitrary code execution. Improved memory handling addresses the multiple memory corruption issues. WebKitGTK contains a memory corruption vulnerability which can allow an attacker to perform remote code execution. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876611 https://webkitgtk.org/security/WSA-2019-0005.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-8720 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0

Go before 1.12.10 and 1.13.x before 1.13.1 allow HTTP Request Smuggling. Go versiones anteriores a 1.12.10 y versiones 1.13.x anteriores a 1.13.1, permitir el Trafico No Autorizado de Peticiones HTTP. It was discovered that net/http (through net/textproto) in golang does not correctly interpret HTTP requests where an HTTP header contains spaces before the colon. This could be abused by an attacker to smuggle HTTP requests when a proxy or a firewall is placed behind a server implemented in Go or to filter bypasses depending on the specific network configuration. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00043.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00044.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0101 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0329 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0652 https://github.com/golang/go/issues/34540 https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21msg/golang-announce/cszieYyuL9Q/g4Z7pKaqAgAJ https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/03/msg00014.html https&# • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 1

runc through 1.0.0-rc8, as used in Docker through 19.03.2-ce and other products, allows AppArmor restriction bypass because libcontainer/rootfs_linux.go incorrectly checks mount targets, and thus a malicious Docker image can mount over a /proc directory. runc versiones hasta 1.0.0-rc8, como es usado en Docker versiones hasta 19.03.2-ce y otros productos, permite omitir la restricción de AppArmor porque el archivo libcontainer/rootfs_linux.go comprueba incorrectamente los destinos de montaje y, por lo tanto, una imagen Docker maliciosa puede ser montada sobre un directorio /proc . • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00073.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00010.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3940 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4074 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4269 https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/issues/2128 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/02/msg00016.html https: • CWE-41: Improper Resolution of Path Equivalence CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •