Page 26 of 445 results (0.010 seconds)

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 1

A use-after-free vulnerability can occur when manipulating arrays of Accessible Rich Internet Applications (ARIA) elements within containers through the DOM. This results in a potentially exploitable crash. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 56, Firefox ESR < 52.4, and Thunderbird < 52.4. Puede ocurrir una vulnerabilidad de uso de memoria previamente liberada cuando se manipulan arrays de elementos ARIA (Accesible Rich Internet Applications) en los contenedores mediante el DOM. Esto resulta en un cierre inesperado explotable. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101055 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039465 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2831 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2885 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1363723 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/11/msg00000.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201803-14 https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3987 https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4014 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisor • CWE-416: Use After Free •

CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0

A flaw was found in the way samba client before samba 4.4.16, samba 4.5.14 and samba 4.6.8 used encryption with the max protocol set as SMB3. The connection could lose the requirement for signing and encrypting to any DFS redirects, allowing an attacker to read or alter the contents of the connection via a man-in-the-middle attack. Se ha encontrado un fallo en la forma en la que el cliente samba en versiones anteriores a samba 4.4.16, samba 4.5.14 y samba 4.6.8 utilizaba cifrado con el protocolo max establecido en SMB3. La conexión podía perder el requisito de firmar y cifrar con cualquier redirección DFS, lo que permitía a un atacante leer o alterar el contenido de la conexión mediante un ataque Man-in-the-Middle (MitM). A flaw was found in the way samba client used encryption with the max protocol set as SMB3. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100917 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039401 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2790 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2858 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-12151 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20170921-0001 https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbux03817en_us https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3983 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-20 • CWE-300: Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •

CVSS: 8.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 43EXPL: 5

The native Bluetooth stack in the Linux Kernel (BlueZ), starting at the Linux kernel version 2.6.32 and up to and including 4.13.1, are vulnerable to a stack overflow vulnerability in the processing of L2CAP configuration responses resulting in Remote code execution in kernel space. La pila Bluetooth nativa en el Kernel Linux (BlueZ), comenzando por la versión 2.6.32 del kernel de Linux y hasta, e incluyendo, la versión 4.13.1, es vulnerable a un desbordamiento de pila durante el procesado de las respuestas de configuración L2CAP, lo que desemboca en la ejecución remota de código en el espacio del kernel. A stack buffer overflow flaw was found in the way the Bluetooth subsystem of the Linux kernel processed pending L2CAP configuration responses from a client. On systems with the stack protection feature enabled in the kernel (CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR=y, which is enabled on all architectures other than s390x and ppc64[le]), an unauthenticated attacker able to initiate a connection to a system via Bluetooth could use this flaw to crash the system. Due to the nature of the stack protection feature, code execution cannot be fully ruled out, although we believe it is unlikely. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42762 https://github.com/hayzamjs/Blueborne-CVE-2017-1000251 https://github.com/own2pwn/blueborne-CVE-2017-1000251-POC https://github.com/sgxgsx/blueborne-CVE-2017-1000251 https://github.com/tlatkdgus1/blueborne-CVE-2017-1000251 http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/4561 http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3981 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100809 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039373 https://access.redhat.com/errata& • CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 13EXPL: 1

RubyGems version 2.6.12 and earlier is vulnerable to maliciously crafted gem specifications that include terminal escape characters. Printing the gem specification would execute terminal escape sequences. RubyGems 2.6.12 y anteriores es vulnerable a especificaciones de gemas manipuladas maliciosamente que incluyen caracteres de escapada de terminal. Imprimir la especificación de las gemas ejecutaría secuencias de escapada de terminal. A vulnerability was found where rubygems did not properly sanitize gems' specification text. • http://blog.rubygems.org/2017/08/27/2.6.13-released.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100576 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039249 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3485 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0378 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0583 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0585 https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/1bcbc7fe637b03145401ec9c094066285934a7f1 https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/ef0aa611effb5f54d40c7fba6e8235eb43c5a491 https • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') CWE-138: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements CWE-150: Improper Neutralization of Escape, Meta, or Control Sequences •

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 2

RubyGems version 2.6.12 and earlier is vulnerable to a DNS hijacking vulnerability that allows a MITM attacker to force the RubyGems client to download and install gems from a server that the attacker controls. RubyGems 2.6.12 y anteriores es vulnerable a secuestro de DNS, lo que permite a un atacante Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) forzar el cliente RubyGems a que descargue e instale gemas desde un servidor que está bajo el control del atacante. A vulnerability was found where rubygems did not sanitize DNS responses when requesting the hostname of the rubygems server for a domain, via a _rubygems._tcp DNS SRV query. An attacker with the ability to manipulate DNS responses could direct the gem command towards a different domain. • http://blog.rubygems.org/2017/08/27/2.6.13-released.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100586 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039249 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3485 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0378 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0583 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0585 https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/8d91516fb7037ecfb27622f605dc40245e0f8d32 https://hackerone.com/reports/218088 https://lists.debian.org/debian- • CWE-138: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements CWE-346: Origin Validation Error CWE-350: Reliance on Reverse DNS Resolution for a Security-Critical Action •