CVE-2019-2698 – Oracle Java Runtime Environment - Heap Corruption During TTF font Rendering in GlyphIterator::setCurrGlyphID
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-2698
Vulnerability in the Java SE component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: 2D). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 7u211 and 8u202. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Java SE. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets (in Java SE 8), that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46723 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00013.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0959 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1146 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1163 https:/& • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVE-2019-2684 – OpenJDK: Incorrect skeleton selection in RMI registry server-side dispatch handling (RMI, 8218453)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-2684
Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: RMI). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 7u211, 8u202, 11.0.2 and 12; Java SE Embedded: 8u201. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Java SE, Java SE Embedded accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets (in Java SE 8), that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00007.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00013.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/09/01/4 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0959 https://access.re •
CVE-2019-0211 – Apache HTTP Server Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-0211
In Apache HTTP Server 2.4 releases 2.4.17 to 2.4.38, with MPM event, worker or prefork, code executing in less-privileged child processes or threads (including scripts executed by an in-process scripting interpreter) could execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the parent process (usually root) by manipulating the scoreboard. Non-Unix systems are not affected. En Apache HTTP Server 2.4, versiones 2.4.17 a 2.4.38, con el evento MPM, worker o prefork, el código ejecutándose en procesos hijo (o hilos) menos privilegiados (incluyendo scripts ejecutados por un intérprete de scripts en proceso) podría ejecutar código arbitrario con los privilegios del proceso padre (normalmente root) manipulando el marcador. Los sistemas que no son Unix no se ven afectados. A flaw was found in Apache where code executing in a less-privileged child process or thread could execute arbitrary code with the privilege of the parent process (usually root). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46676 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00051.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00061.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00084.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152386/Apache-2.4.38-Root-Privilege-Escalation.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152415/Slackware-Security-Advisory-httpd-Updates.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152441/CARPE-DIEM-Apache-2.4.x • CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges CWE-416: Use After Free •
CVE-2019-9948 – python: Undocumented local_file protocol allows remote attackers to bypass protection mechanisms
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9948
urllib in Python 2.x through 2.7.16 supports the local_file: scheme, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass protection mechanisms that blacklist file: URIs, as demonstrated by triggering a urllib.urlopen('local_file:///etc/passwd') call. urllib en Python, en versiones 2.x hasta la 2.7.16, soporta el esquema local_file:, lo que facilita que los atacantes remotos omitan los mecanismos de protección que ponen en lista negra los URI file:, tal y como queda demostrado con una llamada urllib.urlopen('local_file:///etc/passwd'). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00092.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00050.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154927/Slackware-Security-Advisory-python-Updates.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107549 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1700 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2030 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3335 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3520 https://bugs.python.o • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') CWE-749: Exposed Dangerous Method or Function •
CVE-2019-9903 – poppler: stack consumption in function Dict::find() in Dict.cc
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9903
PDFDoc::markObject in PDFDoc.cc in Poppler 0.74.0 mishandles dict marking, leading to stack consumption in the function Dict::find() located at Dict.cc, which can (for example) be triggered by passing a crafted pdf file to the pdfunite binary. PDFDoc::markObject en PDFDoc.cc en Poppler 0.74.0 gestiona de manera incorrecta el marcado de diccionarios, que conduce al consumo de pila en la función Dict::find() en Dict.cc, que puede (por ejemplo) desencadenarse pasando un archivo pdf manipulado al binario pdfunite. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107560 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2713 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/issues/741 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/09/msg00030.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JQ6RABASMSIMMWMDZTP6ZWUWZPTBSVB5 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XGYLZZ4DZUDBQEGCNDWSZPSFNNZJF4S6 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%4 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •