Page 27 of 1430 results (0.021 seconds)

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 1

SDL (Simple DirectMedia Layer) through 1.2.15 and 2.x through 2.0.9 has a heap-based buffer over-read in IMA_ADPCM_decode in audio/SDL_wave.c. SDL (Simple DirectMedia Layer), hasta la versión 1.2.15 y en versiones 2.x hasta la 2.0.9, tiene una sobrelectura de búfer basada en memoria dinámica (heap) en IMA_ADPCM_decode en audio/SDL_wave.c. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00063.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00073.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00088.html https://bugzilla.libsdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4496 https://discourse.libsdl.org/t/vulnerabilities-found-in-libsdl-1-2-15/25720 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/03/msg00015.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/03/msg00016.html https:/& • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •

CVSS: 7.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 1

It was discovered that Dovecot before versions 2.2.36.1 and 2.3.4.1 incorrectly handled client certificates. A remote attacker in possession of a valid certificate with an empty username field could possibly use this issue to impersonate other users. Se ha descubierto que Dovecot, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.36.1 y 2.3.4.1, gestiona de manera incorrecta los certificados del cliente. Un atacante remoto en posesión de un certificado válido con un campo "username" vacío podría emplear este problema para suplantar a otros usuarios. It was discovered that Dovecot incorrectly handled client certificates. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00067.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3467 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-3814 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4XLI55NGRDTGMVOPYFCPPFNPA5VKYSSY https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QHFZ5OWRIZGIWZJ5PTNVWWZNLLNH4XYS https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201904-19 https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2019-Feb • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •

CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

In change_port_settings in drivers/usb/serial/io_ti.c in the Linux kernel before 4.11.3, local users could cause a denial of service by division-by-zero in the serial device layer by trying to set very high baud rates. En change_port_settings en drivers/usb/serial/io_ti.c en el kernel de Linux, en versiones anteriores a la 4.11.3, los usuarios locales podrían provocar una denegación de servicio (DoS) por medio de una división entre cero en la capa del dispositivo en serie intentando establecer tasas de baudio muy altas. A division-by-zero in set_termios(), when debugging is enabled, was found in the Linux kernel. When the [io_ti] driver is loaded, a local unprivileged attacker can request incorrect high transfer speed in the change_port_settings() in the drivers/usb/serial/io_ti.c so that the divisor value becomes zero and causes a system crash resulting in a denial of service. • http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6aeb75e6adfaed16e58780309613a578fe1ee90b http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106802 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123706 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.11.3 https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/6aeb75e6adfaed16e58780309613a578fe1ee90b https://usn.ubuntu.com/3933-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3933-2 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18360 https://bugzilla.redhat.co • CWE-369: Divide By Zero •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 3%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

Incorrect sanitation of the 302 redirect field in HTTP transport method of apt versions 1.4.8 and earlier can lead to content injection by a MITM attacker, potentially leading to remote code execution on the target machine. El saneamiento incorrecto de un campo de redirección 302 en el método HTTP "transport" en apt, en versiones 1.4.8 y anteriores, puede conducir a la inyección de contenido por parte de un atacante MITM, lo que puede conducir a la ejecución remota de código en el equipo objetivo. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106690 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8338a0f605bdbb3a6098bb76f666a95fc2b2f53f37fa1ecc89f1146f%40%3Cdevnull.infra.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/01/msg00013.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/01/msg00014.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190125-0002 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3863-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3863-2 https://www.debian.org/security/2019/dsa-4371 •

CVSS: 7.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0

In PolicyKit (aka polkit) 0.115, the "start time" protection mechanism can be bypassed because fork() is not atomic, and therefore authorization decisions are improperly cached. This is related to lack of uid checking in polkitbackend/polkitbackendinteractiveauthority.c. En PolicyKit (también conocido como polkit) 0.115, el mecanismo de protección "start time" puede omitirse debido a que fork() no es atómico y, por lo tanto, las decisiones de autorización se cachean incorrectamente. Esto está relacionado con la falta de comprobación de uid en polkitbackend/polkitbackendinteractiveauthority.c. A vulnerability was found in polkit. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00049.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106537 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0230 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0420 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0832 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2699 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2978 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=1692 https://git.kernel.org/linus/7b55851367136b1efd84d98fea81ba57a98304cf https • CWE-284: Improper Access Control CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •