CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 3%CPEs: 16EXPL: 1CVE-2016-4977
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4977
When processing authorization requests using the whitelabel views in Spring Security OAuth 2.0.0 to 2.0.9 and 1.0.0 to 1.0.5, the response_type parameter value was executed as Spring SpEL which enabled a malicious user to trigger remote code execution via the crafting of the value for response_type. Cuando se procesan las peticiones de autorización usando las vistas whitelabel en Spring Security OAuth versiones 2.0.0 hasta 2.0.9 y versiones 1.0.0 hasta 1.0.5, el valor del parámetro response_type fue ejecutado como Spring SpEL, lo que habilitó a un usuario malicioso desencadenar la ejecución de código remota por medio del diseño del valor para response_type. • https://github.com/N0b1e6/CVE-2016-4977-POC http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/10/16/1 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0841d849c23418c473ccb9183cbf41a317cb0476e44be48022ce3488%40%3Cdev.fineract.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/37d7e820fc65a768de3e096e98382d5529a52a039f093e59357d0bc0%40%3Cdev.fineract.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5e6dd946635bbcc9e1f2591599ad0fab54f2dc3714196af3b17893f2%40%3Cannounce.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/96c017115069408cec5e82ce1e6293facab398011f6db7e1befbe274% • CWE-19: Data Processing Errors •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2015-1834
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-1834
A path traversal vulnerability was identified in the Cloud Foundry component Cloud Controller that affects cf-release versions prior to v208 and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Elastic Runtime versions prior to 1.4.2. Path traversal is the 'outbreak' of a given directory structure through relative file paths in the user input. It aims at accessing files and directories that are stored outside the web root folder, for disallowed reading or even executing arbitrary system commands. An attacker could use a certain parameter of the file path for instance to inject '../' sequences in order to navigate through the file system. In this particular case a remote authenticated attacker can exploit the identified vulnerability in order to upload arbitrary files to the server running a Cloud Controller instance - outside the isolated application container. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98691 https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2015-1834 • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •
CVSS: 9.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2016-4435
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-4435
An endpoint of the Agent running on the BOSH Director VM with stemcell versions prior to 3232.6 and 3146.13 may allow unauthenticated clients to read or write blobs or cause a denial of service attack on the Director VM. This vulnerability requires that the unauthenticated clients guess or find a URL matching an existing GUID. Un endpoint del agente que se ejecuta en la máquina virtual BOSH Director con versiones de stemcell anteriores a la 3232.6 y a la 3146.13 puede permitir que clientes no autenticados lean o escriban en blobs o lleven a cabo un ataque de denegación de servicio (DoS) en la máquina virtual Director. Esta vulnerabilidad requiere que el cliente no autenticado adivine o encuentre una URL que coincida con un GUID existente. • https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2016-4435 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 66EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5007
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5007
Both Spring Security 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.0 and the Spring Framework 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x, 4.2.x rely on URL pattern mappings for authorization and for mapping requests to controllers respectively. Differences in the strictness of the pattern matching mechanisms, for example with regards to space trimming in path segments, can lead Spring Security to not recognize certain paths as not protected that are in fact mapped to Spring MVC controllers that should be protected. The problem is compounded by the fact that the Spring Framework provides richer features with regards to pattern matching as well as by the fact that pattern matching in each Spring Security and the Spring Framework can easily be customized creating additional differences. Tanto en Spring Security versiones 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.0 como el Framework Spring versiones 3.2.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x, 4.2.x, se basan en el mapeo de patrones de URL para la autorización y para mapear las peticiones hacia los controladores, respectivamente. Las diferencias en el rigor de los mecanismos de coincidencia de patrones, por ejemplo con respecto al recorte de espacio en los segmentos de ruta (path), pueden hacer que Spring Security no reconozca ciertas rutas (paths) como no protegidas que de hecho se asignan a los controladores MVC de Spring que deben protegerse. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91687 https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2016-5007 https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2019-5072835.html • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3191
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3191
With Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release versions v209 or earlier, UAA Standalone versions 2.2.6 or earlier and Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime 1.4.5 or earlier the change_email form in UAA is vulnerable to a CSRF attack. This allows an attacker to trigger an e-mail change for a user logged into a cloud foundry instance via a malicious link on a attacker controlled site. This vulnerability is applicable only when using the UAA internal user store for authentication. Deployments enabled for integration via SAML or LDAP are not affected. En Cloud Foundry Runtime versiones v209 y anteriores, UAA Standalone versiones 2.2.6 o anteriores y Pivotal Cloud Foundry Runtime, versiones 1.4.5 o anteriores, el formulario change_email en UAA es vulnerable a un ataque de tipo CSFR. • https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2015-3191 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •