CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2007-2464
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2007-2464
Race condition in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and PIX 7.1 before 7.1(2)49 and 7.2 before 7.2(2)19, when using "clientless SSL VPNs," allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via "non-standard SSL sessions." Condición de carrera en el Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) y en el PIX 7.1 anterior al 7.1(2)49 y el 7.2 anterior al 7.2(2)19, cuando se utiliza "VPNs SSL sin cliente", permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (recargar el dispositivo) a través de "sesiones SSL no estándar". • http://secunia.com/advisories/25109 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080833166.shtml http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/337508 http://www.osvdb.org/35333 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23768 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1636 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34023 •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 18%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2007-2462
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2007-2462
Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and PIX 7.2 before 7.2(2)8, when using Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) or Remote Management Access, allows remote attackers to bypass LDAP authentication and gain privileges via unknown vectors. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) y PIX 7.2 before 7.2(2)8, cuando utilizan Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) o Remote Management Access, permite a atacantes remotos evitar la validación LDAP y ganar privilegios a través de vectores desconocidos. • http://secunia.com/advisories/25109 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080833166.shtml http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/210876 http://www.osvdb.org/35331 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23768 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017994 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017995 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1636 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34020 •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2007-2461
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2007-2461
The DHCP relay agent in Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and PIX 7.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (dropped packets) via a DHCPREQUEST or DHCPINFORM message that causes multiple DHCPACK messages to be sent from DHCP servers to the agent, which consumes the memory allocated for a local buffer. NOTE: this issue only occurs when multiple DHCP servers are used. El agente transmisor DHCP en Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) y PIX 7.2 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (abandono de paquetes) mediante un mensaje DHCPREQUEST o DHCPINFORM que provoca que múltiples mensajes DHCPACK sean enviados desde servidores DHCP al agente, lo cual consume la memoria reservada para un búfer local. NOTA: esta situación sólo se da cuando se usan múltiples servidores DHCP. • http://secunia.com/advisories/25109 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080833172.html http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/530057 http://www.osvdb.org/35330 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23763 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017999 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018000 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1635 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/34026 •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 5%CPEs: 138EXPL: 0CVE-2006-3906
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2006-3906
Internet Key Exchange (IKE) version 1 protocol, as implemented on Cisco IOS, VPN 3000 Concentrators, and PIX firewalls, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource exhaustion) via a flood of IKE Phase-1 packets that exceed the session expiration rate. NOTE: it has been argued that this is due to a design weakness of the IKE version 1 protocol, in which case other vendors and implementations would also be affected. Protocolo Internet Key Exchange (IKE) version 1, implementado para Cisco IOS, VPN 3000 Concentrators, y PIX firewalls, permite a atacantes remotos provocar denegación de servicio (agotamiento de recursos) a través de un flood de paquetes IKE Phase-1 que exceden el ratio de expiración de la sesión. NOTA: se ha indicado que esto es debido a un diseño debil del protocolo IKe version 1, en cuyo caso otros vendedores e implementaciones podrían verse afectados. • http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2006-07/0531.html http://securityreason.com/securityalert/1293 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016582 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/tsd_technology_security_response09186a00806f33d4.html http://www.nta-monitor.com/posts/2006/07/cisco-concentrator-dos.html http://www.osvdb.org/29068 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/441203/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19176 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities& •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 33%CPEs: 66EXPL: 2CVE-2006-0515 – Cisco - WebSense Content Filtering Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2006-0515
Cisco PIX/ASA 7.1.x before 7.1(2) and 7.0.x before 7.0(5), PIX 6.3.x before 6.3.5(112), and FWSM 2.3.x before 2.3(4) and 3.x before 3.1(7), when used with Websense/N2H2, allows remote attackers to bypass HTTP access restrictions by splitting the GET method of an HTTP request into multiple packets, which prevents the request from being sent to Websense for inspection, aka bugs CSCsc67612, CSCsc68472, and CSCsd81734. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/27830 http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-May/045899.html http://secunia.com/advisories/20044 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016039 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016040 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/netmgtsw/ps2032/tsd_products_security_response09186a00806824ec.html http://www.osvdb.org/25453 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/433270/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17883 http://www.vsecurity.c •