Page 28 of 208 results (0.012 seconds)

CVSS: 5.1EPSS: 1%CPEs: 163EXPL: 0

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT) in Samba 3.x before 3.5.21, 3.6.x before 3.6.12, and 4.x before 4.0.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users by leveraging knowledge of a password and composing requests that perform SWAT actions. Múltiples vulnerabilidades de falsificación de petición en sitios cruzados (CSRF) en el Samba Web Administration Tool (SWAT)en Samba v3.x anterior a v3.5.21, v3.6.x anterior a v3.6.12, y v4.x anterior a v4.0.2, permite a atacantes remotos secuestrar la autenticación de usuarios de su elección para aprovecharse de la contraseña y hacer peticiones que lleven a cabo acciones SWAT • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-02/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-03/msg00042.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-02/msg00029.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-02/msg00033.html http://osvdb.org/89627 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1310.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1542.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0305.html http://www.debian.org/security&# • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •

CVSS: 3.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

Samba 4.0.x before 4.0.1, in certain Active Directory domain-controller configurations, does not properly interpret Access Control Entries that are based on an objectClass, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended restrictions on modifying LDAP directory objects by leveraging (1) objectClass access by a user, (2) objectClass access by a group, or (3) write access to an attribute. Samba v4.0.x antes de v4.0.1, en ??algunas configuraciones de Active Directory del controlador de dominio, no interpreta correctamente las entradas de control de acceso que se basan en una clase de objeto, lo que permite a usuarios remotos autenticados eludir las restricciones a la modificación de objetos LDAP aprovechándose de (1) un acceso objectClass de un usuario, (2) un acceso objectClass de un grupo, o (3) el acceso de escritura a un atributo. • http://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2013-0172 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 37EXPL: 0

The (1) CreateAccount, (2) OpenAccount, (3) AddAccountRights, and (4) RemoveAccountRights LSA RPC procedures in smbd in Samba 3.4.x before 3.4.17, 3.5.x before 3.5.15, and 3.6.x before 3.6.5 do not properly restrict modifications to the privileges database, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain the "take ownership" privilege via an LSA connection. El (1) CreateAccount, (2) OpenAccount, (3) AddAccountRights, y (4) RemoveAccountRights LSA RPC procedimientos en smbd de Samba v3.4.x anterior a v3.4.17, v3.5.x anterior a v3.5.15 y v3.6.x anterior a v3.6.5 no restringe correctamente las modificaciones en la base de datos de privilegios, permitiendo a usuarios remotos autenticados obtener la "toma de posesión" de privilegios a través de una conexión LSA. • http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-May/079662.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-May/079670.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-May/079677.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-04/msg00023.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-05/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-05/msg00003.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=134323086902585&w • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 75%CPEs: 144EXPL: 1

The RPC code generator in Samba 3.x before 3.4.16, 3.5.x before 3.5.14, and 3.6.x before 3.6.4 does not implement validation of an array length in a manner consistent with validation of array memory allocation, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted RPC call. El generador de código RPC de Samba 3.x anteriores a 3.4.16, 3.5.x anteriores a 3.5.14, y 3.6.x anteriores a 3.6.4 no implementa la validación de una longitud de array de una manera consistente con la validación de la reserva de memoria del array, lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de una llamada RPC modificada. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Samba. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the way Samba handles ReportEventW requests. When parsing the data send in the request Samba uses the field 'strings' to create a heap allocation but then uses another field, 'num_of_strings', to write data to the allocation. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/21850 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2012/May/msg00001.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-April/078258.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-April/078726.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-April/078836.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-May/080567.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-04/msg00007.html • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-189: Numeric Errors •

CVSS: 8.3EPSS: 95%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0

Heap-based buffer overflow in process.c in smbd in Samba 3.0, as used in the file-sharing service on the BlackBerry PlayBook tablet before 2.0.0.7971 and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a Batched (aka AndX) request that triggers infinite recursion. Un desbordamiento de buffer basado en memoria dinámica (heap) en process.c de smbd en Samba v3.0, tal como se utiliza en el servicio de intercambio de archivos en la tableta BlackBerry PlayBook anterior a v2.0.0.7971 y otros productos, permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (caída de demonio) o posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario a través de una por lotes (también conocido yx) que desencadena la solicitud de repetición infinita • http://btsc.webapps.blackberry.com/btsc/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=KB29565 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2012/May/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-03/msg00008.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-03/msg00009.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-04/msg00008.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-04/msg00014.html http://secunia.com/advisories/48116 http:& • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •