CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 37EXPL: 0CVE-2019-13118
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-13118
In numbers.c in libxslt 1.1.33, a type holding grouping characters of an xsl:number instruction was too narrow and an invalid character/length combination could be passed to xsltNumberFormatDecimal, leading to a read of uninitialized stack data. En el archivo numbers.c en libxslt versión 1.1.33, un tipo que contiene caracteres de agrupación de una instrucción xsl:number era demasiado estrecho y una combinación de carácter/longitud no válida se podía ser pasada a la función xsltNumberFormatDecimal, conllevando a una lectura de los datos de pila no inicializados. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-05/msg00062.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/11 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/13 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/14 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/15 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Jul/22 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Jul/23 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Jul/24 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Jul/26 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosur • CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 31EXPL: 0CVE-2019-11068 – libxslt: xsltCheckRead and xsltCheckWrite routines security bypass by crafted URL
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11068
libxslt through 1.1.33 allows bypass of a protection mechanism because callers of xsltCheckRead and xsltCheckWrite permit access even upon receiving a -1 error code. xsltCheckRead can return -1 for a crafted URL that is not actually invalid and is subsequently loaded. libxslt hasta la versión 1.1.33 permite omitir los mecanismos de protección debido a que los callers xsltCheckRead y xsltCheckWrite permiten acceso incluso después de recibir el código de error -1. xsltCheckRead puede devolver -1 para una URL creada que no es realmente inválida y que se carga posteriormente. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00048.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00052.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00053.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00001.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/22/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/23/5 https • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 180EXPL: 0CVE-2019-1559 – 0-byte record padding oracle
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-1559
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 57EXPL: 1CVE-2019-7317 – libpng: use-after-free in png_image_free in png.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-7317
png_image_free in png.c in libpng 1.6.x before 1.6.37 has a use-after-free because png_image_free_function is called under png_safe_execute. La función png_image_free en el archivo png.c en libpng versiones 1.6.x anteriores a 1.6.37, presenta un uso de la memoria previamente liberada porque la función png_image_free_function es llamada bajo png_safe_execute. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00029.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00084.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00038.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00044.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152561/Slackware-Security-Advisory-libpng-Updates.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108098 https:/ • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-416: Use After Free •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0CVE-2018-0734 – Timing attack against DSA
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-0734
The OpenSSL DSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2q (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2p). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00030.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00056.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105758 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2304 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3700 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3932 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3933 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3935 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm CWE-385: Covert Timing Channel •