CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 58EXPL: 0CVE-2017-15095 – jackson-databind: Unsafe deserialization due to incomplete black list (incomplete fix for CVE-2017-7525)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-15095
A deserialization flaw was discovered in the jackson-databind in versions before 2.8.10 and 2.9.1, which could allow an unauthenticated user to perform code execution by sending the maliciously crafted input to the readValue method of the ObjectMapper. This issue extends the previous flaw CVE-2017-7525 by blacklisting more classes that could be used maliciously. Se ha descubierto un error de deserialización en jackson-databind, en versiones anteriores a la 2.8.10 y a la 2.9.1, que podría permitir que un usuario no autenticado ejecute código enviando las entradas maliciosamente manipuladas al método readValue de ObjectMapper. Este problema amplía el error previo de CVE-2017-7525 metiendo en la lista negra más clases que podrían emplearse de forma maliciosa. A deserialization flaw was discovered in the jackson-databind which could allow an unauthenticated user to perform code execution by sending the maliciously crafted input to the readValue method of the ObjectMapper. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103880 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039769 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3189 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3190 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0342 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018: • CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 49%CPEs: 52EXPL: 1CVE-2017-7525 – jackson-databind: Deserialization vulnerability via readValue method of ObjectMapper
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7525
A deserialization flaw was discovered in the jackson-databind, versions before 2.6.7.1, 2.7.9.1 and 2.8.9, which could allow an unauthenticated user to perform code execution by sending the maliciously crafted input to the readValue method of the ObjectMapper. Se ha descubierto un error de deserialización en jackson-databind, en versiones anteriores a la 2.6.7.1, 2.7.9.1 y a la 2.8.9, que podría permitir que un usuario no autenticado ejecute código enviando las entradas maliciosamente manipuladas al método readValue de ObjectMapper. A deserialization flaw was discovered in the jackson-databind which could allow an unauthenticated user to perform code execution by sending the maliciously crafted input to the readValue method of the ObjectMapper. • https://github.com/Ingenuity-Fainting-Goats/CVE-2017-7525-Jackson-Deserialization-Lab http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99623 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039744 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039947 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040360 https://access.redhat.com/errat • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 46%CPEs: 34EXPL: 0CVE-2017-9788 – httpd: Uninitialized memory reflection in mod_auth_digest
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-9788
In Apache httpd before 2.2.34 and 2.4.x before 2.4.27, the value placeholder in [Proxy-]Authorization headers of type 'Digest' was not initialized or reset before or between successive key=value assignments by mod_auth_digest. Providing an initial key with no '=' assignment could reflect the stale value of uninitialized pool memory used by the prior request, leading to leakage of potentially confidential information, and a segfault in other cases resulting in denial of service. En Apache httpd, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.34 y en versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.27, el valor placeholder en cabeceras [Proxy-]Authorization del tipo 'Digest' no se inicializó o reinició antes de o entre las asignaciones sucesivas key=value por mod_auth_digest. Proporcionar una clave inicial sin asignación "=" podría reflejar el valor obsoleto de la memoria agrupada no inicializada utilizada por la petición anterior. Esto podría dar lugar al filtrado de información potencialmente confidencial y, en otros casos, a un fallo de segmentación que daría como resultado una denegación de servicio (DoS) It was discovered that the httpd's mod_auth_digest module did not properly initialize memory before using it when processing certain headers related to digest authentication. • http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3913 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99569 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038906 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2478 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2479 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2483 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2708 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2709 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHS • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-456: Missing Initialization of a Variable •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 87%CPEs: 174EXPL: 1CVE-2017-5645 – log4j: Socket receiver deserialization vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-5645
In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. En Apache Log4j 2.x en versiones anteriores a 2.8.2, cuando se utiliza el servidor de socket TCP o el servidor de socket UDP para recibir sucesos de registro serializados de otra aplicación, puede enviarse una carga binaria especialmente diseñada que, cuando se deserializa, puede ejecutar código arbitrario. It was found that when using remote logging with log4j socket server the log4j server would deserialize any log event received via TCP or UDP. An attacker could use this flaw to send a specially crafted log event that, during deserialization, would execute arbitrary code in the context of the logger application. • https://github.com/pimps/CVE-2017-5645 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/19/2 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97702 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040200 http://www.securit • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 52%CPEs: 87EXPL: 1CVE-2016-8610 – SSL/TLS: Malformed plain-text ALERT packets could cause remote DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-8610
A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients. Se ha encontrado un fallo de denegación de servicio en OpenSSL en las versiones 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 hasta la 1.0.2h y la 1.1.0 en la forma en la que el protocolo TLS/SSL definió el procesamiento de paquetes ALERT durante una negociación de conexión. Un atacante remoto podría emplear este fallo para hacer que un servidor TLS/SSL consuma una cantidad excesiva de recursos de CPU y fracase a la hora de aceptar conexiones de otros clientes. A denial of service flaw was found in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. • https://github.com/cujanovic/CVE-2016-8610-PoC http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0286.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0574.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1415.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1659.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/224 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93841 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037084 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1413 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1414 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •