Page 3 of 16 results (0.012 seconds)

CVSS: 4.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

XENMEM_populate_physmap in Xen 4.0, 4.1, and 4.2, and Citrix XenServer 6.0.2 and earlier, when translating paging mode is not used, allows local PV OS guest kernels to cause a denial of service (BUG triggered and host crash) via invalid flags such as MEMF_populate_on_demand. XENMEM_populate_physmap en Xen v4.0, v4.1, y v4.2, y Citrix XenServer v6.0.2 y anteriores, cuando el modo de traducción de página no se utiliza, permite a los kernels locales PV del SO invitado causar una denegación de servicio (caída del host) a través flags inválidos como MEMF_populate_on_demand. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00012.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00017.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00018.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-11/msg00017.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-11 • CWE-16: Configuration •

CVSS: 2.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0

The set_debugreg hypercall in include/asm-x86/debugreg.h in Xen 4.0, 4.1, and 4.2, and Citrix XenServer 6.0.2 and earlier, when running on x86-64 systems, allows local OS guest users to cause a denial of service (host crash) by writing to the reserved bits of the DR7 debug control register. La hiperllamada et_debugreg en include/asm-x86/debugreg.h en Xen v4.0, v4.1, y v4.2, y Citrix XenServer v6.0.2 y anteriores, cuando se ejecuta sobre systemas x86-64, permite a usuarios locales del SO invitado generar una denegación de servicio (caída del host) mediante la escritura de ciertos bits reservados para el registro de control DR • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00012.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00017.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •

CVSS: 7.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 3

The x86-64 kernel system-call functionality in Xen 4.1.2 and earlier, as used in Citrix XenServer 6.0.2 and earlier and other products; Oracle Solaris 11 and earlier; illumos before r13724; Joyent SmartOS before 20120614T184600Z; FreeBSD before 9.0-RELEASE-p3; NetBSD 6.0 Beta and earlier; Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 and R2 SP1 and Windows 7 Gold and SP1; and possibly other operating systems, when running on an Intel processor, incorrectly uses the sysret path in cases where a certain address is not a canonical address, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application. NOTE: because this issue is due to incorrect use of the Intel specification, it should have been split into separate identifiers; however, there was some value in preserving the original mapping of the multi-codebase coordinated-disclosure effort to a single identifier. El modo de usuario Scheduler en el núcleo en Microsoft Windows Server v2008 R2 y R2 SP1 y Windows v7 Gold y SP1 sobre la plataforma x64 no maneja adecuadamente solicitudes del sistema, lo que permite a usuarios locales obtener privilegios a través de una aplicación modificada, también conocida como "vulnerabilidad de corrupción de memoria de modo de usuario Scheduler". It was found that the Xen hypervisor implementation as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 did not properly restrict the syscall return addresses in the sysret return path to canonical addresses. An unprivileged user in a 64-bit para-virtualized guest, that is running on a 64-bit host that has an Intel CPU, could use this flaw to crash the host or, potentially, escalate their privileges, allowing them to execute arbitrary code at the hypervisor level. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46508 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/28718 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/20861 http://blog.illumos.org/2012/06/14/illumos-vulnerability-patched http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2012/06/13/the-intel-sysret-privilege-escalation http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2012-003.txt.asc http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-announce/2012-06/msg00001.html http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-06 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 1.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

Citrix XenServer 5.0 Update 2 and earlier, and 5.5 Update 1 and earlier, when using a pvops kernel, allows guest users to cause a denial of service in the host via unspecified vectors that trigger "incorrectly set flags." Citrix XenServer v5.0 Update 2 y anteriores, y v5.5 Update 1 y anteriores, cuando se utiliza un kernel pvops, permite causar una denegación de servicio a los usuarios invitados en el host a través de vectores no especificados que se generan "banderas con valores incorrectos". • http://secunia.com/advisories/40282 http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX125319 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024157 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1613 •

CVSS: 4.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in Citrix XenServer 5.0 Update 3 and earlier, and 5.5, allows local users to bypass authentication and execute unspecified Xen API (XAPI) calls via unknown vectors. Vulnerabilidad sin especificar en Citrix XenServer v5.0 Update 3 y anteriores, y v5.5, permite a usuarios locales evitar la autenticación y ejecutar llamadas API (XAPI) sin especificar a través de vectores desconocidos. • http://secunia.com/advisories/38431 http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX123193 http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX123456 http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX123460 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/38052 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1023530 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0290 •