Page 3 of 14 results (0.005 seconds)

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 72EXPL: 0

On BIG-IP version 16.1.x before 16.1.2.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.5, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.5, and all versions of 13.1.x and 12.1.x, and BIG-IQ all versions of 8.x and 7.x, undisclosed requests by an authenticated iControl REST user can cause an increase in memory resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. En BIG-IP versiones 16.1.x anteriores a 16.1.2.1, 15.1.x anteriores a 15.1.5, 14.1.x anteriores a 14.1.4.5, y todas las versiones de 13.1.x y 12.1.x, y BIG-IQ todas las versiones de 8.x y 7.x, las peticiones no reveladas por un usuario autenticado de iControl REST pueden causar un aumento en el uso de recursos de memoria. Nota: Las versiones de software que han alcanzado el Fin de Soporte Técnico (EoTS) no son evaluadas • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K11742742 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 60EXPL: 1

The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows remote attackers (from the client side) to send arbitrary numbers that are actually not public keys, and trigger expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations, aka a D(HE)at or D(HE)ater attack. The client needs very little CPU resources and network bandwidth. The attack may be more disruptive in cases where a client can require a server to select its largest supported key size. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE. El Protocolo de Acuerdo de Claves Diffie-Hellman permite a atacantes remotos (del lado del cliente) enviar números arbitrarios que en realidad no son claves públicas, y desencadenar costosos cálculos de exponenciación modular DHE del lado del servidor, también se conoce como un ataque D(HE)ater. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-506569.pdf https://dheatattack.com https://dheatattack.gitlab.io https://github.com/Balasys/dheater https://github.com/mozilla/ssl-config-generator/issues/162 https://gitlab.com/dheatattack/dheater https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10374117 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K83120834 https://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2022-004.txt https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2022/10/21/tls-groups-configuration https: • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 59EXPL: 0

BIG-IP version 16.0.x before 16.0.1.2, 15.1.x before 15.1.3, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.2, 13.1.x before 13.1.4.1, and all versions of 12.1.x and 11.6.x and all versions of BIG-IQ 8.x, 7.x, and 6.x are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks through iControl SOAP. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. BIG-IP versiones 16.0.x anteriores a 16.0.1.2, versiones 15.1.x anteriores a 15.1.3, versiones 14.1.x anteriores a 14.1.4.2, versiones 13.1.x anteriores a 13.1.4.1 y todas las versiones de 12.1.x y la 11.6.x y todas las versiones de BIG-IQ 8.x, 7.x y 6.x son vulnerables a ataques de tipo cross-site request forgery (CSRF) mediante iControl SOAP. Nota: Las versiones de software que han alcanzado End of Technical Support (EoTS) no son evaluadas • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K53854428 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 180EXPL: 0

If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •