CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2019-16714
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-16714
In the Linux kernel before 5.2.14, rds6_inc_info_copy in net/rds/recv.c allows attackers to obtain sensitive information from kernel stack memory because tos and flags fields are not initialized. En el kernel de Linux versiones anteriores a 5.2.14, la función rds6_inc_info_copy en el archivo net/rds/recv.c permite a atacantes obtener información confidencial de la memoria de la pila del kernel porque los campos tos y flags no están inicializados. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/09/24/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/09/25/1 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/ChangeLog-5.2.14 https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/7d0a06586b2686ba80c4a2da5f91cb10ffbea736 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20191031-0005 https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K48351130?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS https://usn.ubuntu.com/4157-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4157-2 • CWE-909: Missing Initialization of Resource •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0CVE-2019-13565
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-13565
An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48. When using SASL authentication and session encryption, and relying on the SASL security layers in slapd access controls, it is possible to obtain access that would otherwise be denied via a simple bind for any identity covered in those ACLs. After the first SASL bind is completed, the sasl_ssf value is retained for all new non-SASL connections. Depending on the ACL configuration, this can affect different types of operations (searches, modifications, etc.). In other words, a successful authorization step completed by one user affects the authorization requirement for a different user. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00053.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00058.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Dec/26 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1b103833cb5bc8466e24ff0ecc5e75b45a705334ab6a444e64e840a0%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues. •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 1CVE-2019-13050 – GnuPG: interaction between the sks-keyserver code and GnuPG allows for a Certificate Spamming Attack which leads to persistent DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-13050
Interaction between the sks-keyserver code through 1.2.0 of the SKS keyserver network, and GnuPG through 2.2.16, makes it risky to have a GnuPG keyserver configuration line referring to a host on the SKS keyserver network. Retrieving data from this network may cause a persistent denial of service, because of a Certificate Spamming Attack. La interacción entre el código sks-keyserver hasta versión 1.2.0 de la red SKS keyserver, y GnuPG hasta la versión 2.2.16, hace arriesgado tener una línea de configuración keyserver de GnuPG que se refiera a un host en la red SKS keyserver. La recuperación de datos de esta red puede causar una denegación de servicio persistente, debido a un Ataque de Spamming de Certificado. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00039.html https://gist.github.com/rjhansen/67ab921ffb4084c865b3618d6955275f https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/pack • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation CWE-297: Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 91EXPL: 0CVE-2019-11477 – Integer overflow in TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11477
Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs value was subject to an integer overflow in the Linux kernel when handling TCP Selective Acknowledgments (SACKs). A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit 3b4929f65b0d8249f19a50245cd88ed1a2f78cff. Jonathan Looney detectó que el valor TCP_SKB_CB(skb)-mayor que tcp_gso_segs estuvo sujeto a un desbordamiento de enteros en el kernel de Linux durante el manejo del Reconocimiento Selectivo (SACK) de TCP. Un atacante remoto podría usar esto para causar una denegación de servicio. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153346/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0052-1.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154951/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0058-1.html http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2020-010.txt http://www.huawei.com/en/psirt/security-advisories/huawei-sa-20191225-01-kernel-en http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/20/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss&# • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 96%CPEs: 90EXPL: 0CVE-2019-11478 – SACK can cause extensive memory use via fragmented resend queue
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11478
Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP retransmission queue implementation in tcp_fragment in the Linux kernel could be fragmented when handling certain TCP Selective Acknowledgment (SACK) sequences. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit f070ef2ac66716357066b683fb0baf55f8191a2e. Jonathan Looney descubrió que la implementación de la cola de retransmisión de TCP en tcp_fragment en el kernel de Linux podría estar fragmentada cuando se manejan ciertas secuencias de Reconocimiento Selectivo (SACK) de TCP. Un atacante remoto podría usar esto para causar una denegación de servicio. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153346/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0052-1.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154408/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0055-1.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154951/Kernel-Live-Patch-Security-Notice-LSN-0058-1.html http://www.arubanetworks.com/assets/alert/ARUBA-PSA-2020-010.txt http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/06/28/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/07/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists& • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •