CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2018-16868
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-16868
A Bleichenbacher type side-channel based padding oracle attack was found in the way gnutls handles verification of RSA decrypted PKCS#1 v1.5 data. An attacker who is able to run process on the same physical core as the victim process, could use this to extract plaintext or in some cases downgrade any TLS connections to a vulnerable server. Se ha detectado un ataque de oráculo de relleno basado en canales laterales de tipo Bleichenbacher en la manera en la que gnutls maneja la verificación de los datos PKCS#1 v1.5 descifrados de un cifrado RSA. Un atacante que sea capaz de ejecutar un proceso en el mismo núcleo físico que el proceso víctima podría usarlo para extraer texto plano o, en algunos casos, desactualizar algunas conexiones TLS a un servidor vulnerable. • http://cat.eyalro.net http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00017.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00068.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106080 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-16868 • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0CVE-2018-10846 – gnutls: "Just in Time" PRIME + PROBE cache-based side channel attack can lead to plaintext recovery
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-10846
A cache-based side channel in GnuTLS implementation that leads to plain text recovery in cross-VM attack setting was found. An attacker could use a combination of "Just in Time" Prime+probe attack in combination with Lucky-13 attack to recover plain text using crafted packets. Se ha detectado un canal lateral basado en memoria caché en la implementación GnuTLS que conduce a un ataque de recuperación de texto plano a través de una máquina virtual. Un atacante podría utilizar una combinación de un ataque "Just in Time" Prime+probe con un ataque Lucky-13 para recuperar texto plano usando paquetes manipulados. A cache-based side channel attack was found in the way GnuTLS implements CBC-mode cipher suites. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105138 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3050 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3505 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-10846 https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/747 https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/657 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/10/msg00022.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ILMOWPKMTZAIMK5F32TUMO34XCABUCFJ https://lists.fedor • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm CWE-385: Covert Timing Channel •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0CVE-2018-10844 – gnutls: HMAC-SHA-256 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to not enough dummy function calls
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-10844
It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-256 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets. Se ha detectado que la implementación GnuTLS de HMAC-SHA-256 era vulnerable a un ataque de estilo Lucky Thirteen. Los atacantes remotos podrían utilizar este fallo para realizar ataques de distinción y de recuperación en texto plano mediante análisis estadísticos de datos temporales mediante paquetes manipulados. It was found that GnuTLS's implementation of HMAC-SHA-256 was vulnerable to Lucky Thirteen-style attack. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105138 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3050 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3505 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-10844 https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/747 https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/657 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/10/msg00022.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ILMOWPKMTZAIMK5F32TUMO34XCABUCFJ https://lists.fedor • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm CWE-385: Covert Timing Channel •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0CVE-2018-10845 – gnutls: HMAC-SHA-384 vulnerable to Lucky thirteen attack due to use of wrong constant
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-10845
It was found that the GnuTLS implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky thirteen style attack. Remote attackers could use this flaw to conduct distinguishing attacks and plain text recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data using crafted packets. Se ha detectado que la implementación GnuTLS de HMAC-SHA-384 era vulnerable a un ataque de estilo Lucky Thirteen. Los atacantes remotos podrían utilizar este fallo para realizar ataques de distinción y de recuperación en texto plano mediante análisis estadísticos de datos temporales mediante paquetes manipulados. It was found that GnuTLS's implementation of HMAC-SHA-384 was vulnerable to a Lucky Thirteen-style attack. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105138 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3050 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3505 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-10845 https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/747 https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/merge_requests/657 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/10/msg00022.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ILMOWPKMTZAIMK5F32TUMO34XCABUCFJ https://lists.fedor • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm CWE-385: Covert Timing Channel •