CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 97%CPEs: 31EXPL: 2CVE-2020-8617 – A logic error in code which checks TSIG validity can be used to trigger an assertion failure in tsig.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-8617
Using a specially-crafted message, an attacker may potentially cause a BIND server to reach an inconsistent state if the attacker knows (or successfully guesses) the name of a TSIG key used by the server. Since BIND, by default, configures a local session key even on servers whose configuration does not otherwise make use of it, almost all current BIND servers are vulnerable. In releases of BIND dating from March 2018 and after, an assertion check in tsig.c detects this inconsistent state and deliberately exits. Prior to the introduction of the check the server would continue operating in an inconsistent state, with potentially harmful results. Al usar un mensaje especialmente diseñado, un atacante puede causar que un servidor BIND alcance un estado inconsistente si el atacante conoce (o adivina con éxito) el nombre de una clave TSIG utilizada por el servidor. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/48521 https://github.com/knqyf263/CVE-2020-8617 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00044.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/157836/BIND-TSIG-Denial-Of-Service.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/05/19/4 https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2020-8617 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/05/msg00031.html https:/ • CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVSS: 8.6EPSS: 1%CPEs: 20EXPL: 1CVE-2020-8616 – BIND does not sufficiently limit the number of fetches performed when processing referrals
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-8616
A malicious actor who intentionally exploits this lack of effective limitation on the number of fetches performed when processing referrals can, through the use of specially crafted referrals, cause a recursing server to issue a very large number of fetches in an attempt to process the referral. This has at least two potential effects: The performance of the recursing server can potentially be degraded by the additional work required to perform these fetches, and The attacker can exploit this behavior to use the recursing server as a reflector in a reflection attack with a high amplification factor. Un actor malicioso que explota intencionalmente esta falta de limitación efectiva en el número de recuperaciones realizadas cuando se procesan referencias puede, mediante el uso de referencias especialmente diseñadas, causar que un servidor recurrente emita una gran cantidad de recuperaciones en un intento de procesar la referencia. Esto tiene al menos dos efectos potenciales: el rendimiento del servidor recurrente puede estar potencialmente afectado por el trabajo adicional requerido para realizar estas recuperaciones, y el atacante puede explotar este comportamiento para utilizar el servidor recurrente como un reflector en un ataque de reflexión con un alto factor de amplificación A flaw was found in BIND, where it does not sufficiently limit the number of fetches that can be performed while processing a referral response. This flaw allows an attacker to cause a denial of service attack. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00044.html http://www.nxnsattack.com http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/05/19/4 https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2020-8616 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/05/msg00031.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JKJXVBOKZ36ER3EUCR7VRB7WGHIIMPNJ https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archi • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2013-5661
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-5661
Cache Poisoning issue exists in DNS Response Rate Limiting. Existe Un problema de envenenamiento de caché en el DNS Response Rate Limiting. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-5661 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-5661 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2013-5661 • CWE-290: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5741 – Update policies krb5-subdomain and ms-subdomain do not enforce controls promised in their documentation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5741
To provide fine-grained controls over the ability to use Dynamic DNS (DDNS) to update records in a zone, BIND 9 provides a feature called update-policy. Various rules can be configured to limit the types of updates that can be performed by a client, depending on the key used when sending the update request. Unfortunately, some rule types were not initially documented, and when documentation for them was added to the Administrator Reference Manual (ARM) in change #3112, the language that was added to the ARM at that time incorrectly described the behavior of two rule types, krb5-subdomain and ms-subdomain. This incorrect documentation could mislead operators into believing that policies they had configured were more restrictive than they actually were. This affects BIND versions prior to BIND 9.11.5 and BIND 9.12.3. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00044.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105379 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041674 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2057 https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2018-5741 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201903-13 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190830-0001 https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&doc • CWE-284: Improper Access Control CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 95%CPEs: 26EXPL: 0CVE-2018-5740 – A flaw in the "deny-answer-aliases" feature can cause an assertion failure in named
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5740
"deny-answer-aliases" is a little-used feature intended to help recursive server operators protect end users against DNS rebinding attacks, a potential method of circumventing the security model used by client browsers. However, a defect in this feature makes it easy, when the feature is in use, to experience an assertion failure in name.c. Affects BIND 9.7.0->9.8.8, 9.9.0->9.9.13, 9.10.0->9.10.8, 9.11.0->9.11.4, 9.12.0->9.12.2, 9.13.0->9.13.2. "deny-answer-aliases" es una característica poco utilizada que pretende ayudar a los operadores recursivos del servidor a proteger a los usuarios finales contra ataques de reenlace DNS, un método para poder eludir el modelo de seguridad empleado por los navegadores del cliente. Sin embargo, un defecto en esta característica hace que sea sencillo experimentar un fallo de aserción en name.c. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00026.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00027.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105055 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041436 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2570 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2571 https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01639 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/08/msg00033.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11&#x • CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •