Page 3 of 23 results (0.012 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 7%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0

BIND before 9.2.6-P1 and 9.3.x before 9.3.2-P1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via certain SIG queries, which cause an assertion failure when multiple RRsets are returned. BIND anterior a 9.2.6-P1 y 9.3.x anterior a 9.3.2-P1 permite a un atacante remoto provocar denegación de servicio (caida) a través de ciertas consultas SIG, lo cual provoca una falta de aserción cuando múltiples RRsets se devuelven. • http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=305530 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2007/May/msg00004.html http://secunia.com/advisories/21752 http://secunia.com/advisories/21786 http://secunia.com/advisories/21816 http://secunia.com/advisories/21818 http://secunia.com/advisories/21828 http://secunia.com/advisories/21835 http://secunia.com/advisories/21838 http://secunia.com/advisories/21912 http://secunia.com/advisories/21926 http://secunia.com/advisories&#x • CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 5%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

BIND 4 (BIND4) and BIND 8 (BIND8), if used as a target forwarder, allows remote attackers to gain privileged access via a "Kashpureff-style DNS cache corruption" attack. • http://attrition.org/pipermail/vim/2006-February/000551.html http://computerworld.com/networkingtopics/networking/story/0%2C10801%2C103744%2C00.html http://secunia.com/advisories/18690 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/438 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/748 http://securitytracker.com/id?1015551 http://securitytracker.com/id?1015606 http://www.osvdb.org/22888 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/425083/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16455 http://www.vupen& • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 31EXPL: 0

BIND 4 and BIND 8, when resolving recursive DNS queries for arbitrary hosts, allows remote attackers to conduct DNS cache poisoning via a birthday attack that uses a large number of open queries for the same resource record (RR) combined with spoofed responses, which increases the possibility of successfully spoofing a response in a way that is more efficient than brute force methods. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/Security-announce/2002/Nov/msg00000.html http://secunia.com/advisories/20217 http://www.imconf.net/imw-2002/imw2002-papers/198.pdf http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/457875 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/IAFY-5FDPYP http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/IAFY-5FDT4U http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/IAFY-5FZSLQ http://www.rnp.br/cais/alertas/2002/cais-ALR-19112002a.html http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434523/100/0/threaded •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 32EXPL: 0

The DNS resolver in unspecified versions of Fujitsu UXP/V, when resolving recursive DNS queries for arbitrary hosts, allows remote attackers to conduct DNS cache poisoning via a birthday attack that uses a large number of open queries for the same resource record (RR) combined with spoofed responses, which increases the possibility of successfully spoofing a response in a way that is more efficient than brute force methods. • http://www.imconf.net/imw-2002/imw2002-papers/198.pdf http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/457875 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/IAFY-5FDT5K http://www.rnp.br/cais/alertas/2002/cais-ALR-19112002a.html •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 32EXPL: 0

The DNS resolver in unspecified versions of Infoblox DNS One, when resolving recursive DNS queries for arbitrary hosts, allows remote attackers to conduct DNS cache poisoning via a birthday attack that uses a large number of open queries for the same resource record (RR) combined with spoofed responses, which increases the possibility of successfully spoofing a response in a way that is more efficient than brute force methods. • http://www.imconf.net/imw-2002/imw2002-papers/198.pdf http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/457875 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/IAFY-5FDPYJ http://www.rnp.br/cais/alertas/2002/cais-ALR-19112002a.html •