CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 7%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0CVE-2006-4095
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2006-4095
BIND before 9.2.6-P1 and 9.3.x before 9.3.2-P1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via certain SIG queries, which cause an assertion failure when multiple RRsets are returned. BIND anterior a 9.2.6-P1 y 9.3.x anterior a 9.3.2-P1 permite a un atacante remoto provocar denegación de servicio (caida) a través de ciertas consultas SIG, lo cual provoca una falta de aserción cuando múltiples RRsets se devuelven. • http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=305530 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2007/May/msg00004.html http://secunia.com/advisories/21752 http://secunia.com/advisories/21786 http://secunia.com/advisories/21816 http://secunia.com/advisories/21818 http://secunia.com/advisories/21828 http://secunia.com/advisories/21835 http://secunia.com/advisories/21838 http://secunia.com/advisories/21912 http://secunia.com/advisories/21926 http://secunia.com/advisories&#x • CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 2%CPEs: 58EXPL: 0CVE-2003-0914
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2003-0914
ISC BIND 8.3.x before 8.3.7, and 8.4.x before 8.4.3, allows remote attackers to poison the cache via a malicious name server that returns negative responses with a large TTL (time-to-live) value. ISC BIND 8.3.x antes de 8.3.7, y 8.4.x antes de 8.4.3 permite a atacantes remotos envenenar la cache mediante un servidor de nombres malicioso que devuelve respuestas negativas con un valor TTL (time to live) largo. • ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/updates/OpenLinux/3.1.1/Server/CSSA-2004-003.0/CSSA-2004-003.0.txt ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/updates/UnixWare/CSSA-2003-SCO.33/CSSA-2003-SCO.33.txt http://secunia.com/advisories/10542 http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fsalert/57434 http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-409 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/734644 http://www.trustix.org/errata/misc/2003/TSL-2003-0044-bind.asc.txt https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository& •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 31EXPL: 0CVE-2002-2211
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2002-2211
BIND 4 and BIND 8, when resolving recursive DNS queries for arbitrary hosts, allows remote attackers to conduct DNS cache poisoning via a birthday attack that uses a large number of open queries for the same resource record (RR) combined with spoofed responses, which increases the possibility of successfully spoofing a response in a way that is more efficient than brute force methods. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/Security-announce/2002/Nov/msg00000.html http://secunia.com/advisories/20217 http://www.imconf.net/imw-2002/imw2002-papers/198.pdf http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/457875 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/IAFY-5FDPYP http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/IAFY-5FDT4U http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/IAFY-5FZSLQ http://www.rnp.br/cais/alertas/2002/cais-ALR-19112002a.html http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434523/100/0/threaded •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 32EXPL: 0CVE-2002-2212
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2002-2212
The DNS resolver in unspecified versions of Fujitsu UXP/V, when resolving recursive DNS queries for arbitrary hosts, allows remote attackers to conduct DNS cache poisoning via a birthday attack that uses a large number of open queries for the same resource record (RR) combined with spoofed responses, which increases the possibility of successfully spoofing a response in a way that is more efficient than brute force methods. • http://www.imconf.net/imw-2002/imw2002-papers/198.pdf http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/457875 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/IAFY-5FDT5K http://www.rnp.br/cais/alertas/2002/cais-ALR-19112002a.html •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 32EXPL: 0CVE-2002-2213
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2002-2213
The DNS resolver in unspecified versions of Infoblox DNS One, when resolving recursive DNS queries for arbitrary hosts, allows remote attackers to conduct DNS cache poisoning via a birthday attack that uses a large number of open queries for the same resource record (RR) combined with spoofed responses, which increases the possibility of successfully spoofing a response in a way that is more efficient than brute force methods. • http://www.imconf.net/imw-2002/imw2002-papers/198.pdf http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/457875 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/IAFY-5FDPYJ http://www.rnp.br/cais/alertas/2002/cais-ALR-19112002a.html •