CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 1CVE-2009-5049
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-5049
WebApp JSP Snoop page XSS in jetty though 6.1.21. Una vulnerabilidad de tipo XSS de la página WebSpp JSP Snoop en jetty versiones hasta 6.1.21. • http://www.ush.it/team/ush/hack-jetty6x7x/jetty-adv.txt https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2009-5049 https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/14/2 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 1CVE-2009-5048
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-5048
Cookie Dump Servlet stored XSS vulnerability in jetty though 6.1.20. Una vulnerabilidad de tipo XSS almacenado en Cookie Dump Servlet en jetty versiones hasta 6.1.20. • http://www.ush.it/team/ush/hack-jetty6x7x/jetty-adv.txt https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2009-5048 https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/14/2 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0CVE-2017-7658 – jetty: Incorrect header handling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7658
In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization. En Eclipse Jetty Server, en versiones 9.2.x y anteriores, versiones 9.3.x (todas las configuraciones que no sean HTTP/1.x) y versiones 9.4.x (todas las configuraciones HTTP/1.x), cuando se presentan con dos cabeceras content-lengths, Jetty ignora la segunda. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106566 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535669 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/708d94141126eac03011144a971a6411fcac16d9c248d1d535a39451%40%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9317fd092b257a0815434b116a8af8daea6e920b6673f4fd5583d5fe%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread& • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0CVE-2017-7657 – jetty: HTTP request smuggling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7657
In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), transfer-encoding chunks are handled poorly. The chunk length parsing was vulnerable to an integer overflow. Thus a large chunk size could be interpreted as a smaller chunk size and content sent as chunk body could be interpreted as a pipelined request. If Jetty was deployed behind an intermediary that imposed some authorization and that intermediary allowed arbitrarily large chunks to be passed on unchanged, then this flaw could be used to bypass the authorization imposed by the intermediary as the fake pipelined request would not be interpreted by the intermediary as a request. En Eclipse Jetty, en versiones 9.2.x y anteriores, versiones 9.3.x (todas las configuraciones) y versiones 9.4.x (configuración personalizada con el cumplimiento RFC2616 habilitado), los fragmentos transfer-encoding se gestionan de forma incorrecta. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0910 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535668 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/708d94141126eac03011144a971a6411fcac16d9c248d1d535a39451%40%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9317fd092b257a0815434b116a8af8daea6e920b6673f4fd5583d5fe%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache. • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2017-7656 – jetty: HTTP request smuggling using the range header
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7656
In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), HTTP/0.9 is handled poorly. An HTTP/1 style request line (i.e. method space URI space version) that declares a version of HTTP/0.9 was accepted and treated as a 0.9 request. If deployed behind an intermediary that also accepted and passed through the 0.9 version (but did not act on it), then the response sent could be interpreted by the intermediary as HTTP/1 headers. This could be used to poison the cache if the server allowed the origin client to generate arbitrary content in the response. En Eclipse Jetty, en versiones 9.2.x y anteriores, versiones 9.3.x (todas las configuraciones) y versiones 9.4.x (configuración personalizada con el cumplimiento RFC2616 habilitado), HTTP/0.9 se gestiona de forma incorrecta. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535667 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/708d94141126eac03011144a971a6411fcac16d9c248d1d535a39451%40%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9317fd092b257a0815434b116a8af8daea6e920b6673f4fd5583d5fe%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbf4565a0b63f9c8b07fab29352a97bbffe76ecafed8b8555c15b83c6% • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •