CVE-2022-48065
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-48065
GNU Binutils before 2.40 was discovered to contain a memory leak vulnerability var the function find_abstract_instance in dwarf2.c. • https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GLZXZXFX2ZWTDU2QZUSZG36LZZVTKUVG https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KGSKF4GH7425S6XFDQMWTJGD5U47BAZN https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231006-0008 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29925 https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git%3Bh=d28fbc7197ba0e021a43f873eff90b05dcdcff6a • CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime •
CVE-2023-36054 – krb5: Denial of service through freeing uninitialized pointer
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-36054
lib/kadm5/kadm_rpc_xdr.c in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) before 1.20.2 and 1.21.x before 1.21.1 frees an uninitialized pointer. A remote authenticated user can trigger a kadmind crash. This occurs because _xdr_kadm5_principal_ent_rec does not validate the relationship between n_key_data and the key_data array count. A vulnerability was found in the _xdr_kadm5_principal_ent_rec() function in lib/kadm5/kadm_rpc_xdr.c in MIT Kerberos 5 (krb5). This issue occurs due to lack of validation in the relationship between n_key_data and the key_data array count, leading to the freeing of uninitialized pointers. • https://github.com/krb5/krb5/commit/ef08b09c9459551aabbe7924fb176f1583053cdd https://github.com/krb5/krb5/compare/krb5-1.20.1-final...krb5-1.20.2-final https://github.com/krb5/krb5/compare/krb5-1.21-final...krb5-1.21.1-final https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/10/msg00031.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230908-0004 https://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www/advisories https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-36054 https://bugzilla.redhat.com • CWE-824: Access of Uninitialized Pointer •
CVE-2023-3107 – Remote denial of service in IPv6 fragment reassembly
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-3107
A set of carefully crafted ipv6 packets can trigger an integer overflow in the calculation of a fragment reassembled packet's payload length field. This allows an attacker to trigger a kernel panic, resulting in a denial of service. Un conjunto de paquetes ipv6 cuidadosamente diseñados puede desencadenar un desbordamiento de enteros en el cálculo del campo de longitud de la carga útil de un paquete reensamblado por fragmentos. Esto permite a un atacante desencadenar un kernel panic, resultando en una denegación de servicio. • https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-23:06.ipv6.asc https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230804-0001 • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVE-2023-38403 – iperf3: memory allocation hazard and crash
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-38403
iperf3 before 3.14 allows peers to cause an integer overflow and heap corruption via a crafted length field. An integer overflow flaw was found in the way iperf3 dynamically allocates memory buffers for JSON-formatted messages. A remote attacker could send a specially crafted sequence of bytes on the iperf3 control channel with a specified JSON message length of 0xffffffff to trigger an integer overflow leading the receiving process to abort due to heap corruption. This flaw allows an attacker to use a malicious client to cause a denial of service of an iperf3 server or potentially use a malicious server to cause connecting clients to crash. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Oct/24 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Oct/26 https://bugs.debian.org/1040830 https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/130.html https://downloads.es.net/pub/iperf/esnet-secadv-2023-0001.txt.asc https://github.com/esnet/iperf/commit/0ef151550d96cc4460f98832df84b4a1e87c65e9 https://github.com/esnet/iperf/issues/1542 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/07/msg00025.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce% • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVE-2023-2975 – AES-SIV implementation ignores empty associated data entries
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-2975
Issue summary: The AES-SIV cipher implementation contains a bug that causes it to ignore empty associated data entries which are unauthenticated as a consequence. Impact summary: Applications that use the AES-SIV algorithm and want to authenticate empty data entries as associated data can be mislead by removing adding or reordering such empty entries as these are ignored by the OpenSSL implementation. We are currently unaware of any such applications. The AES-SIV algorithm allows for authentication of multiple associated data entries along with the encryption. To authenticate empty data the application has to call EVP_EncryptUpdate() (or EVP_CipherUpdate()) with NULL pointer as the output buffer and 0 as the input buffer length. The AES-SIV implementation in OpenSSL just returns success for such a call instead of performing the associated data authentication operation. The empty data thus will not be authenticated. As this issue does not affect non-empty associated data authentication and we expect it to be rare for an application to use empty associated data entries this is qualified as Low severity issue. Issue summary: The AES-SIV cipher implementation contains a bug that causes it to ignore empty associated data entries which are unauthenticated as a consequence. Impact summary: Applications that use the AES-SIV algorithm and want to authenticate empty data entries as associated data can be misled by removing, adding or reordering such empty entries as these are ignored by the OpenSSL implementation. We are currently unaware of any such applications. The AES-SIV algorithm allows for authentication of multiple associated data entries along with the encryption. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/15/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/5 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=00e2f5eea29994d19293ec4e8c8775ba73678598 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=6a83f0c958811f07e0d11dfc6b5a6a98edfd5bdc https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230725-0004 https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230714.txt https://access.redhat.com/securi • CWE-287: Improper Authentication CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value •