CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 58EXPL: 0CVE-2019-5490
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-5490
Certain versions between 2.x to 5.x (refer to advisory) of the NetApp Service Processor firmware were shipped with a default account enabled that could allow unauthorized arbitrary command execution. Any platform listed in the advisory Impact section may be affected and should be upgraded to a fixed version of Service Processor firmware IMMEDIATELY. Ciertas versiones entre la 2.x y la 5.x (véase el advisory) del firmware de NetApp Service Processor se distribuían con una cuenta por defecto habilitada que podría permitir la ejecución no autorizada de comandos arbitrarios. Cualquier plataforma listada en la sección "impact" del advisory podría haberse visto afectada y debe actualizarse a una versión solucionada del firmware de Service Processor INMEDIATAMENTE. • http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/LEN-26771 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190305-0001 • CWE-1188: Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 180EXPL: 0CVE-2019-1559 – 0-byte record padding oracle
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-1559
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 2%CPEs: 32EXPL: 18CVE-2018-15473 – OpenSSH < 7.7 - User Enumeration
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-15473
OpenSSH through 7.7 is prone to a user enumeration vulnerability due to not delaying bailout for an invalid authenticating user until after the packet containing the request has been fully parsed, related to auth2-gss.c, auth2-hostbased.c, and auth2-pubkey.c. OpenSSH hasta la versión 7.7 es propenso a una vulnerabilidad de enumeración de usuarios debido a que no retrasa el rescate de un usuario de autenticación no válido hasta que el paquete que contiene la petición haya sido analizado completamente. Esto está relacionado con auth2-gss.c, auth2-hostbased.c, y auth2-pubkey.c. A user enumeration vulnerability flaw was found in OpenSSH, though version 7.7. The vulnerability occurs by not delaying bailout for an invalid authenticated user until after the packet containing the request has been fully parsed. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45939 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45233 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45210 https://github.com/Rhynorater/CVE-2018-15473-Exploit https://github.com/r3dxpl0it/CVE-2018-15473 https://github.com/Sait-Nuri/CVE-2018-15473 https://github.com/LINYIKAI/CVE-2018-15473-exp https://github.com/MrDottt/CVE-2018-15473 https://github.com/yZ1337/CVE-2018-15473 https://github.com/1stPeak/CVE-2018-15473 https://github.com/0xrobiu • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 5%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0CVE-2016-10708 – openssh: Out of sequence NEWKEYS message can allow remote attacker to cause denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-10708
sshd in OpenSSH before 7.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via an out-of-sequence NEWKEYS message, as demonstrated by Honggfuzz, related to kex.c and packet.c. sshd en OpenSSH, en versiones anteriores a la 7.4, permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una denegación de servicio (desreferencia de puntero NULL y cierre inesperado del demonio) mediante un mensaje NEWKEYS fuera de secuencia, tal y como demuestra Honggfuzz, relacionado con kex.c y packet.c. • http://blog.swiecki.net/2018/01/fuzzing-tcp-servers.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102780 https://anongit.mindrot.org/openssh.git/commit/?id=28652bca29046f62c7045e933e6b931de1d16737 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-676336.pdf https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10284 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/01/msg00031.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00010.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180423 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 52%CPEs: 87EXPL: 1CVE-2016-8610 – SSL/TLS: Malformed plain-text ALERT packets could cause remote DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-8610
A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients. Se ha encontrado un fallo de denegación de servicio en OpenSSL en las versiones 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 hasta la 1.0.2h y la 1.1.0 en la forma en la que el protocolo TLS/SSL definió el procesamiento de paquetes ALERT durante una negociación de conexión. Un atacante remoto podría emplear este fallo para hacer que un servidor TLS/SSL consuma una cantidad excesiva de recursos de CPU y fracase a la hora de aceptar conexiones de otros clientes. A denial of service flaw was found in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. • https://github.com/cujanovic/CVE-2016-8610-PoC http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0286.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0574.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1415.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1659.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/224 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93841 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037084 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1413 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1414 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •