Page 3 of 23 results (0.013 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 95%CPEs: 25EXPL: 2

The fetch_url function in usr.bin/ftp/fetch.c in tnftp, as used in NetBSD 5.1 through 5.1.4, 5.2 through 5.2.2, 6.0 through 6.0.6, and 6.1 through 6.1.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a | (pipe) character at the end of an HTTP redirect. La función fetch_url ubicada en usr.bin/ftp/fetch.c en thftp, usada en NetBSD 5.1 en 5.1.4, 5.2 hasta 5.2.2, 6.0 hasta 6.0.6 y 6.1 hasta 6.1.5 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar comandos arbitrarios a través de un carácter '|' (tubería) al final de una redirección HTTP. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/35427 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43112 http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2014-013.txt.asc http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Jan/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-11/msg00029.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q4/459 http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q4/464 http://secunia.com/advisories/62028 http://secunia.com/advisories/62260 http://support. • CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 147EXPL: 1

The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, aka the "POODLE" issue. El protocolo SSL 3.0, utilizado en OpenSSL hasta 1.0.1i y otros productos, utiliza relleno (padding) CBC no determinístico, lo que facilita a los atacantes man-in-the-middle obtener datos de texto plano a través de un ataque de relleno (padding) oracle, también conocido como el problema "POODLE". A flaw was found in the way SSL 3.0 handled padding bytes when decrypting messages encrypted using block ciphers in cipher block chaining (CBC) mode. This flaw allows a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacker to decrypt a selected byte of a cipher text in as few as 256 tries if they are able to force a victim application to repeatedly send the same data over newly created SSL 3.0 connections. • https://github.com/mikesplain/CVE-2014-3566-poodle-cookbook ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2014-015.txt.asc http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0416.html http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory11.asc http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-10/0101.html http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-10/0103.html http://askubuntu.com/questions/537196/how-do-i-patch-workaround-sslv3-poodle-vulnerability-cve-2014-3566 http& • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-757: Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation ('Algorithm Downgrade') •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 40EXPL: 0

bozotic HTTP server (aka bozohttpd) before 20140708, as used in NetBSD, truncates paths when checking .htpasswd restrictions, which allows remote attackers to bypass the HTTP authentication scheme and access restrictions via a long path. El servidor HTTP bozotic (también conocido como bozohttpd) anterior a 20140708, utilizado en NetBSD, trunca las rutas cuando compruebe las restricciones .htpasswd, lo que permite a atacantes remotos evadir la esquema de la autenticación HTTP y acceder a las restricciones a través de una ruta larga. • ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2014-007.txt.asc http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q3/180 http://www.eterna.com.au/bozohttpd http://www.eterna.com.au/bozohttpd/CHANGES http://www.osvdb.org/109283 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/68752 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/94751 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •

CVSS: 7.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 3

The x86-64 kernel system-call functionality in Xen 4.1.2 and earlier, as used in Citrix XenServer 6.0.2 and earlier and other products; Oracle Solaris 11 and earlier; illumos before r13724; Joyent SmartOS before 20120614T184600Z; FreeBSD before 9.0-RELEASE-p3; NetBSD 6.0 Beta and earlier; Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 and R2 SP1 and Windows 7 Gold and SP1; and possibly other operating systems, when running on an Intel processor, incorrectly uses the sysret path in cases where a certain address is not a canonical address, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application. NOTE: because this issue is due to incorrect use of the Intel specification, it should have been split into separate identifiers; however, there was some value in preserving the original mapping of the multi-codebase coordinated-disclosure effort to a single identifier. El modo de usuario Scheduler en el núcleo en Microsoft Windows Server v2008 R2 y R2 SP1 y Windows v7 Gold y SP1 sobre la plataforma x64 no maneja adecuadamente solicitudes del sistema, lo que permite a usuarios locales obtener privilegios a través de una aplicación modificada, también conocida como "vulnerabilidad de corrupción de memoria de modo de usuario Scheduler". It was found that the Xen hypervisor implementation as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 did not properly restrict the syscall return addresses in the sysret return path to canonical addresses. An unprivileged user in a 64-bit para-virtualized guest, that is running on a 64-bit host that has an Intel CPU, could use this flaw to crash the host or, potentially, escalate their privileges, allowing them to execute arbitrary code at the hypervisor level. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/46508 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/28718 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/20861 http://blog.illumos.org/2012/06/14/illumos-vulnerability-patched http://blog.xen.org/index.php/2012/06/13/the-intel-sysret-privilege-escalation http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2012-003.txt.asc http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-announce/2012-06/msg00001.html http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-06 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 2049EXPL: 0

The TCP implementation in (1) Linux, (2) platforms based on BSD Unix, (3) Microsoft Windows, (4) Cisco products, and probably other operating systems allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection queue exhaustion) via multiple vectors that manipulate information in the TCP state table, as demonstrated by sockstress. La implementación del protocolo TCP en (1) Linux, (2) plataformas basadas en BSD Unix, (3) Microsoft Windows, (4) productos Cisco, y probablemente otros sistemas operativos, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (agotamiento de cola de conexión) a través de múltiples vectores que manipulan información en la tabla de estados del TCP, como lo demuestra sockstress. • http://blog.robertlee.name/2008/10/conjecture-speculation.html http://insecure.org/stf/tcp-dos-attack-explained.html http://lists.immunitysec.com/pipermail/dailydave/2008-October/005360.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=125856010926699&w=2 http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com.au/articles/27154-TCP-is-fundamentally-borked http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080af511d.shtml http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080a15120.html http://www.cpni • CWE-16: Configuration •