CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0CVE-2021-43527 – nss: Memory corruption in decodeECorDsaSignature with DSA signatures (and RSA-PSS)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-43527
NSS (Network Security Services) versions prior to 3.73 or 3.68.1 ESR are vulnerable to a heap overflow when handling DER-encoded DSA or RSA-PSS signatures. Applications using NSS for handling signatures encoded within CMS, S/MIME, PKCS \#7, or PKCS \#12 are likely to be impacted. Applications using NSS for certificate validation or other TLS, X.509, OCSP or CRL functionality may be impacted, depending on how they configure NSS. *Note: This vulnerability does NOT impact Mozilla Firefox.* However, email clients and PDF viewers that use NSS for signature verification, such as Thunderbird, LibreOffice, Evolution and Evince are believed to be impacted. This vulnerability affects NSS < 3.73 and NSS < 3.68.1. • https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1737470 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-594438.pdf https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_68_1_RTM https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_73_RTM https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202212-05 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211229-0002 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2021-51 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.starwindsoftw • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 2CVE-2021-43396
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-43396
In iconvdata/iso-2022-jp-3.c in the GNU C Library (aka glibc) 2.34, remote attackers can force iconv() to emit a spurious '\0' character via crafted ISO-2022-JP-3 data that is accompanied by an internal state reset. This may affect data integrity in certain iconv() use cases. NOTE: the vendor states "the bug cannot be invoked through user input and requires iconv to be invoked with a NULL inbuf, which ought to require a separate application bug to do so unintentionally. Hence there's no security impact to the bug. ** EN DISPUTA ** En el archivo iconvdata/iso-2022-jp-3.c de la Biblioteca C de GNU (también conocida como glibc) 2.34, los atacantes remotos pueden forzar a iconv() a emitir un carácter espurio '\0' a través de datos ISO-2022-JP-3 manipulados que van acompañados de un reinicio de estado interno. Esto puede afectar a la integridad de los datos en ciertos casos de uso de iconv(). • https://blog.tuxcare.com/vulnerability/vulnerability-in-iconv-identified-by-tuxcare-team-cve-2021-43396 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28524 https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=ff012870b2c02a62598c04daa1e54632e020fd7d https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 38EXPL: 0CVE-2021-37136 – netty-codec: Bzip2Decoder doesn't allow setting size restrictions for decompressed data
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-37136
The Bzip2 decompression decoder function doesn't allow setting size restrictions on the decompressed output data (which affects the allocation size used during decompression). All users of Bzip2Decoder are affected. The malicious input can trigger an OOME and so a DoS attack La función Bzip2 decompression decoder no permite establecer restricciones de tamaño en los datos de salida descomprimidos (lo que afecta al tamaño de asignación usado durante la descompresión). Todos los usuarios de Bzip2Decoder están afectados. La entrada maliciosa puede desencadenar un OOME y así un ataque de DoS A flaw was found in Netty's netty-codec due to size restrictions for decompressed data in the Bzip2Decoder. • https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-grg4-wf29-r9vv https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r06a145c9bd41a7344da242cef07977b24abe3349161ede948e30913d%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5406eaf3b07577d233b9f07cfc8f26e28369e6bab5edfcab41f28abb%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5e05eba32476c580412f9fbdfc9b8782d5b40558018ac4ac07192a04%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r75490c61c2cb7b6ae2c81238fd52ae13636c60435abcd732d41531a0%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E ht • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 46EXPL: 1CVE-2021-22947 – curl: Server responses received before STARTTLS processed after TLS handshake
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-22947
When curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 connects to an IMAP or POP3 server to retrieve data using STARTTLS to upgrade to TLS security, the server can respond and send back multiple responses at once that curl caches. curl would then upgrade to TLS but not flush the in-queue of cached responses but instead continue using and trustingthe responses it got *before* the TLS handshake as if they were authenticated.Using this flaw, it allows a Man-In-The-Middle attacker to first inject the fake responses, then pass-through the TLS traffic from the legitimate server and trick curl into sending data back to the user thinking the attacker's injected data comes from the TLS-protected server. Cuando en curl versiones posteriores a 7.20.0 incluyéndola, y versiones anteriores a 7.78.0 incluyéndola, se conecta a un servidor IMAP o POP3 para recuperar datos usando STARTTLS para actualizar a la seguridad TLS, el servidor puede responder y enviar múltiples respuestas a la vez que curl almacena en caché. curl entonces actualizaría a TLS pero no vaciaría la cola de respuestas almacenadas en caché, sino que continuaría usando y confiando en las respuestas que obtuvo *antes* del protocolo de enlace TLS como si estuvieran autenticadas. Usando este fallo, permite a un atacante de tipo Man-In-The-Middle inyectar primero las respuestas falsas, luego pasar mediante el tráfico TLS del servidor legítimo y engañar a curl para que envíe datos de vuelta al usuario pensando que los datos inyectados por el atacante provienen del servidor protegido por TLS A flaw was found in curl. The flaw lies in how curl handles cached or pipelined responses that it receives from either a IMAP, POP3, SMTP or FTP server before the TLS upgrade using STARTTLS. In such a scenario curl even after upgrading to TLS would trust these cached responses treating them as valid and authenticated and use them. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Mar/29 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://hackerone.com/reports/1334763 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/09/msg00022.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/08/msg00017.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/APOAK4X73EJTAPTSVT7IRVDMUWVXNWGD https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RWLEC6YVEM2HWUBX67 • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 49EXPL: 1CVE-2021-22946 – curl: Requirement to use TLS not properly enforced for IMAP, POP3, and FTP protocols
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-22946
A user can tell curl >= 7.20.0 and <= 7.78.0 to require a successful upgrade to TLS when speaking to an IMAP, POP3 or FTP server (`--ssl-reqd` on the command line or`CURLOPT_USE_SSL` set to `CURLUSESSL_CONTROL` or `CURLUSESSL_ALL` withlibcurl). This requirement could be bypassed if the server would return a properly crafted but perfectly legitimate response.This flaw would then make curl silently continue its operations **withoutTLS** contrary to the instructions and expectations, exposing possibly sensitive data in clear text over the network. Un usuario puede decirle a curl versiones posteriores a 7.20.0 incluyéndola , y versiones anteriores a 7.78.0 incluyéndola, que requiera una actualización con éxito a TLS cuando hable con un servidor IMAP, POP3 o FTP ("--ssl-reqd" en la línea de comandos o "CURLOPT_USE_SSL" configurado como "CURLUSESSL_CONTROL" o "CURLUSESSL_ALL" conlibcurl). Este requisito podría ser omitido si el servidor devolviera una respuesta correctamente diseñada pero perfectamente legítima. Este fallo haría que curl continuara silenciosamente sus operaciones **withoutTLS** en contra de las instrucciones y expectativas, exponiendo posiblemente datos confidenciales en texto sin cifrar a través de la red A flaw was found in curl. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Mar/29 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://hackerone.com/reports/1334111 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/09/msg00022.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/08/msg00017.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/APOAK4X73EJTAPTSVT7IRVDMUWVXNWGD https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RWLEC6YVEM2HWUBX67 • CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •