Page 3 of 231 results (0.038 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 6EXPL: 1

A vulnerability was found in the way RemoteMessageChannel, introduced in jboss-remoting versions 3.3.10, reads from an empty buffer. An attacker could use this flaw to cause denial of service via high CPU caused by an infinite loop. Se ha encontrado una vulnerabilidad en la forma en la que RemoteMessageChannel, introducido en las versiones 3.3.10 de jboss-remoting, lee desde un búfer vacío. Un atacante podría emplear este error para provocar una denegación de servicio (DoS) mediante un consumo alto de CPU a través de un bucle infinito. A vulnerability was found in the way RemoteMessageChannel, introduced in jboss-remoting versions 3.3.10.Final-redhat-1, reads from an empty buffer. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44099 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040323 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0268 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0269 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0270 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0271 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0275 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1530457 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-1041 • CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 0

An integer overflow in the implementation of the posix_memalign in memalign functions in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.26 and earlier could cause these functions to return a pointer to a heap area that is too small, potentially leading to heap corruption. Un desbordamiento de enteros en la implementación de posix_memalign en las funciones memalign en GNU C Library (también conocido como glibc o libc6) en versiones 2.26 y anteriores podría provocar que estas funciones devuelvan un puntero a un área de la memoria dinámica (heap) demasiado pequeña, pudiendo corromper el heap. • http://bugs.debian.org/878159 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102912 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0327 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3092 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190404-0003 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22343 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4218-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4416-1 https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-6485 https:/ • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0

The IP stack in the Linux kernel through 4.8.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (stack consumption and panic) or possibly have unspecified other impact by triggering use of the GRO path for large crafted packets, as demonstrated by packets that contain only VLAN headers, a related issue to CVE-2016-8666. La pila IP en el kernel de Linux hasta la versión 4.8.2 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de pila y pánico) o tener otro posible impacto no especificado desencadenando uso de la ruta GRO para paquetes grandes manipulados, como se demuestra por los paquetes que contienen solo cabeceras VLAN, un problema relacionado con CVE-2016-8666. Linux kernel built with the 802.1Q/802.1ad VLAN(CONFIG_VLAN_8021Q) OR Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network(CONFIG_VXLAN) with Transparent Ethernet Bridging(TEB) GRO support, is vulnerable to a stack overflow issue. It could occur while receiving large packets via GRO path, as an unlimited recursion could unfold in both VLAN and TEB modules, leading to a stack corruption in the kernel. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2047.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2107.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2110.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/10/10/15 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2016-3090545.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinoct2016-3090547.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93476 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0372 https://bto.bluecoat.com/ • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion •

CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in the kernel-uek component in Oracle Linux 6 allows local users to affect availability via unknown vectors. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en el componente kernel-uek en Oracle Linux 6 permite a usuarios locales afectar la disponibilidad a través de vectores no especificados. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinapr2016-2952096.html http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034968 •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 49EXPL: 2

buffer.c in named in ISC BIND 9 before 9.9.9-P3, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P3, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0rc3 does not properly construct responses, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a crafted query. buffer.c en named en ISC BIND 9 en versiones anteriores a 9.9.9-P3, 9.10.x en versiones anteriores a 9.10.4-P3 y 9.11.x en versiones anteriores a 9.11.0rc3 no construye respuestas adecuadamente, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (fallo de aserción y salida de demonio) a través de una consulta manipulada. A denial of service flaw was found in the way BIND constructed a response to a query that met certain criteria. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make named exit unexpectedly with an assertion failure via a specially crafted DNS request packet. A defect in the rendering of messages into packets can cause named to exit with an assertion failure in buffer.c while constructing a response to a query that meets certain criteria. This assertion can be triggered even if the apparent source address isnt allowed to make queries. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40453 https://github.com/infobyte/CVE-2016-2776 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1944.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1945.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2099.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinoct2016-3090566.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2016-3090545.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinoct2016-3090547.html http://www.securityf • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •