CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 14%CPEs: 74EXPL: 2CVE-2020-13935 – tomcat: multiple requests with invalid payload length in a WebSocket frame could lead to DoS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-13935
The payload length in a WebSocket frame was not correctly validated in Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36, 8.5.0 to 8.5.56 and 7.0.27 to 7.0.104. Invalid payload lengths could trigger an infinite loop. Multiple requests with invalid payload lengths could lead to a denial of service. La longitud de la carga útil en una trama de WebSocket no fue comprobada correctamente en Apache Tomcat versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.0-M6, versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.36, versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.56 y versiones 7.0.27 hasta 7.0. 104. Las longitudes de carga útil no válidas podrían desencadenar un bucle infinito. • https://github.com/RedTeamPentesting/CVE-2020-13935 https://github.com/aabbcc19191/CVE-2020-13935 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00084.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-07/msg00088.html https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10332 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4e5d3c09f4dd2923191e972408b40fb8b42dbff0bc7904d44b651e50%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd48c72bd3255bda87564d4da3791517c074d94f8a701f93b85752651%40%3Cannounce& • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •
CVSS: 7.0EPSS: 91%CPEs: 77EXPL: 12CVE-2020-9484 – tomcat: deserialization flaw in session persistence storage leading to RCE
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-9484
When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed. Cuando se usa Apache Tomcat versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.34, 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.54 y 7.0.0 hasta 7.0. 103, si a) un atacante es capaz de controlar el contenido y el nombre de un archivo en el servidor; y b) el servidor está configurado para usar el PersistenceManager con un FileStore; y c) el PersistenceManager está configurado con sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (el valor predeterminado a menos que se utilice un SecurityManager) o un filtro lo suficientemente laxo como para permitir que el objeto proporcionado por el atacante sea deserializado; y d) el atacante conoce la ruta relativa del archivo desde la ubicación de almacenamiento usada por FileStore hasta el archivo sobre el que el atacante presenta control; entonces, mediante una petición específicamente diseñada, el atacante podrá ser capaz de desencadenar una ejecución de código remota mediante la deserialización del archivo bajo su control. Tome en cuenta que todas las condiciones desde la a) hasta la d) deben cumplirse para que el ataque tenga éxito. A deserialization flaw was discovered in Apache Tomcat's use of a FileStore. • https://github.com/masahiro331/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/IdealDreamLast/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/osamahamad/CVE-2020-9484-Mass-Scan https://github.com/PenTestical/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/AssassinUKG/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/RepublicR0K/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/anjai94/CVE-2020-9484-exploit https://github.com/ColdFusionX/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/VICXOR/CVE-2020-9484 https://github.com/seanachao/CVE-2020-9484 https://github& • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 101EXPL: 0CVE-2020-9488 – log4j: improper validation of certificate with host mismatch in SMTP appender
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-9488
Improper validation of certificate with host mismatch in Apache Log4j SMTP appender. This could allow an SMTPS connection to be intercepted by a man-in-the-middle attack which could leak any log messages sent through that appender. Fixed in Apache Log4j 2.12.3 and 2.13.1 Validación incorrecta del certificado con desajuste de host en el apéndice SMTP de Apache Log4j. Esto podría permitir que una conexión SMTPS fuera interceptada por un ataque de tipo man-in-the-middle que podría filtrar cualquier mensaje de registro enviado a través de ese appender. Corregido en Apache Log4j 2.12.3 y 2.13.1 • https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2819 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0a2699f724156a558afd1abb6c044fb9132caa66dce861b82699722a%40%3Cjira.kafka.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0df3d7a5acb98c57e64ab9266aa21eeee1d9b399addb96f9cf1cbe05%40%3Cdev.zookeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1fc73f0e16ec2fa249d3ad39a5194afb9cc5afb4c023dc0bab5a5881%40%3Cissues.hive.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r22a56beb76dd8cf18e24fda9072f1e05990f49d6439662d3782a392f%40%3Cissues.hive.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.o • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0CVE-2020-11612 – netty: compression/decompression codecs don't enforce limits on buffer allocation sizes
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-11612
The ZlibDecoders in Netty 4.1.x before 4.1.46 allow for unbounded memory allocation while decoding a ZlibEncoded byte stream. An attacker could send a large ZlibEncoded byte stream to the Netty server, forcing the server to allocate all of its free memory to a single decoder. El ZlibDecoders en Netty versiones 4.1.x anteriores a 4.1.46, permite una asignación de memoria ilimitada mientras decodifican un flujo de bytes de ZlibEncoded. Un atacante podría enviar una secuencia de bytes de ZlibEncoded grande hacia el servidor de Netty, forzando al servidor a asignar toda su memoria liberada a un único decodificador. A flaw was found in Netty in the way it handles the amount of data it compresses and decompresses. • https://github.com/netty/netty/compare/netty-4.1.45.Final...netty-4.1.46.Final https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/6168 https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/9924 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r14446ed58208cb6d97b6faa6ebf145f1cf2c70c0886c0c133f4d3b6f%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r255ed239e65d0596812362adc474bee96caf7ba042c7ad2f3c62cec7%40%3Cissues.zookeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r281882fdf9ea89aac02fd2f92786693a956aac2ce9840cce87c7df6b%40%3Ccommits.zookeeper.apache. • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 8.0EPSS: 62%CPEs: 63EXPL: 1CVE-2020-5398 – RFD Attack via "Content-Disposition" Header Sourced from Request Input by Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux Application
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-5398
In Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3, versions 5.1.x prior to 5.1.13, and versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.16, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a "Content-Disposition" header in the response where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input. En Spring Framework, versiones 5.2.x anteriores a 5.2.3, versiones 5.1.x anteriores a 5.1.13 y versiones 5.0.x anteriores a 5.0.16, una aplicación es vulnerable a un ataque de tipo reflected file download (RFD) cuando se establece un encabezado "Content-Disposition" en la respuesta donde el atributo filename es derivado de la entrada suministrada por el usuario. A flaw was found in springframework in versions prior to 5.0.16, 5.1.13, and 5.2.3. A reflected file download (RFD) attack is possible when a "Content-Disposition" header is set in response to where the filename attribute is derived from user supplied input. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. • https://github.com/motikan2010/CVE-2020-5398 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r028977b9b9d44a89823639aa3296fb0f0cfdd76b4450df89d3c4fbbf%40%3Cissues.karaf.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0f2d0ae1bad2edb3d4a863d77f3097b5e88cfbdae7b809f4f42d6aad%40%3Cissues.karaf.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0f3530f7cb510036e497532ffc4e0bd0b882940448cf4e233994b08b%40%3Ccommits.karaf.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1accbd4f31ad2f40e1661d70a4510a584eb3efd1e32e8660ccf46676%40%3Ccommits.karaf.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org&#x • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') CWE-494: Download of Code Without Integrity Check •