CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 38EXPL: 18CVE-2020-1938 – Apache Tomcat Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-1938
When using the Apache JServ Protocol (AJP), care must be taken when trusting incoming connections to Apache Tomcat. Tomcat treats AJP connections as having higher trust than, for example, a similar HTTP connection. If such connections are available to an attacker, they can be exploited in ways that may be surprising. In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99, Tomcat shipped with an AJP Connector enabled by default that listened on all configured IP addresses. It was expected (and recommended in the security guide) that this Connector would be disabled if not required. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/49039 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/48143 https://github.com/sgdream/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/xindongzhuaizhuai/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/laolisafe/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/sv3nbeast/CVE-2020-1938-Tomact-file_include-file_read https://github.com/fairyming/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/dacade/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/Hancheng-Lei/Hacking-Vulnerability-CVE-2020-1938-Ghostcat https://github.com/w4fz5uck5& • CWE-285: Improper Authorization •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 60EXPL: 0CVE-2020-1935 – tomcat: Mishandling of Transfer-Encoding header allows for HTTP request smuggling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-1935
In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99 the HTTP header parsing code used an approach to end-of-line parsing that allowed some invalid HTTP headers to be parsed as valid. This led to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely. En Apache Tomcat versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.30, versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.50 y versiones 7.0.0 hasta 7.0.99, el código de análisis del encabezado HTTP utilizó un enfoque para el análisis de fin de línea que permitió a algunos encabezados HTTP no válidos ser analizados como válidos. Esto conllevó a una posibilidad de Tráfico No Autorizado de Peticiones HTTP si Tomcat se encontraba detrás de un proxy inverso que manejaba incorrectamente el encabezado Transfer-Encoding no válido en una manera particular. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00025.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r127f76181aceffea2bd4711b03c595d0f115f63e020348fe925a916c%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r441c1f30a252bf14b07396286f6abd8089ce4240e91323211f1a2d75%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r660cd379afe346f10d72c0eaa8459ccc95d83aff181671b7e9076919%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7bc994c965a34876bd94d5ff15b4e1e30b6220a15eb9b47c81915b78%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0CVE-2019-17569 – tomcat: Regression in handling of Transfer-Encoding header allows for HTTP request smuggling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-17569
The refactoring present in Apache Tomcat 9.0.28 to 9.0.30, 8.5.48 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.98 to 7.0.99 introduced a regression. The result of the regression was that invalid Transfer-Encoding headers were incorrectly processed leading to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely. La refactorización presente en Apache Tomcat versiones 9.0.28 hasta 9.0.30, versiones 8.5.48 hasta 8.5.50 y versiones 7.0.98 hasta 7.0.99, introdujo una regresión. El resultado de la regresión fue que los encabezados Transfer-Encoding no válidos fueron procesados incorrectamente, conllevando a una posibilidad de Tráfico No Autorizado de Peticiones HTTP si Tomcat se encontraba detrás de un proxy inverso que manejaba incorrectamente el encabezado Transfer-Encoding no válido de una manera particular. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00025.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7bc994c965a34876bd94d5ff15b4e1e30b6220a15eb9b47c81915b78%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r88def002c5c78534674ca67472e035099fbe088813d50062094a1390%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc31cbabb46cdc58bbdd8519a8f64b6236b2635a3922bbeba0f0e3743%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/03/msg00006.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory&# • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 574EXPL: 0CVE-2019-13163
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-13163
The Fujitsu TLS library allows a man-in-the-middle attack. This affects Interstage Application Development Cycle Manager V10 and other versions, Interstage Application Server V12 and other versions, Interstage Business Application Manager V2 and other versions, Interstage Information Integrator V11 and other versions, Interstage Job Workload Server V8, Interstage List Works V10 and other versions, Interstage Studio V12 and other versions, Interstage Web Server Express V11, Linkexpress V5, Safeauthor V3, ServerView Resource Orchestrator V3, Systemwalker Cloud Business Service Management V1, Systemwalker Desktop Keeper V15, Systemwalker Desktop Patrol V15, Systemwalker IT Change Manager V14, Systemwalker Operation Manager V16 and other versions, Systemwalker Runbook Automation V15 and other versions, Systemwalker Security Control V1, and Systemwalker Software Configuration Manager V15. La biblioteca Fujitsu TLS permite un ataque de tipo man-in-the-middle. Esto afecta a Interstage Application Development Cycle Manager versión V10 y otras versiones, Interstage Application Server versión V12 y otras versiones, Interstage Business Application Manager versión V2 y otras versiones, Interstage Information Integrator versión V11 y otras versiones, Interstage Job Workload Server versión V8, Interstage List Works versión V10 y otras versiones , Interstage Studio versión V12 y otras versiones, Interstage Web Server Express versión V11, Linkexpress versión V5, Safeauthor versión V3, ServerView Resource Orchestrator versión V3, Systemwalker Cloud Business Service Management versión V1, Systemwalker Desktop Keeper versión V15, Systemwalker Desktop Patrol versión V15, Systemwalker IT Change Manager versión V14, Systemwalker Operation Manager versión V16 y otras versiones, Systemwalker Runbook Automation versión V15 y otras versiones, Systemwalker Security Control versión V1 y Systemwalker Software Configuration Manager versión V15. • https://www.fujitsu.com/jp/products/software/resources/condition/security/products-fujitsu/solution/interstage-systemwalker-tls-202001.html • CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2019-12418 – tomcat: local privilege escalation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-12418
When Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.28, 8.5.0 to 8.5.47, 7.0.0 and 7.0.97 is configured with the JMX Remote Lifecycle Listener, a local attacker without access to the Tomcat process or configuration files is able to manipulate the RMI registry to perform a man-in-the-middle attack to capture user names and passwords used to access the JMX interface. The attacker can then use these credentials to access the JMX interface and gain complete control over the Tomcat instance. Cuando Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.28, 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.47, 7.0.0 y 7.0.97, es configurado con JMX Remote Lifecycle Listener, un atacante local sin acceso al proceso de Tomcat o a archivos de configuración es capaz de manipular el registro RMI para llevar a cabo un ataque de tipo man-in-the-middle para capturar nombres de usuario y contraseñas utilizados para acceder a la interfaz de JMX. El atacante puede usar estas credenciales para acceder a la interfaz de JMX y conseguir un control completo sobre la instancia de Tomcat. A privilege escalation flaw was found in Tomcat when the JMX Remote Lifecycle Listener was enabled. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00013.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/43530b91506e2e0c11cfbe691173f5df8c48f51b98262426d7493b67%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3bbb800a816d0a51eccc5a228c58736960a9fffafa581a225834d97d%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r48c1444845fe15a823e1374674bfc297d5008a5453788099ea14caf0%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r6ccee4e849bc77df0840c7f853f6bd09d426f6741247da2b7429d5d9%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E https • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •