Page 3 of 483 results (0.013 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 54EXPL: 0

Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.20 to 2.4.43. A specially crafted value for the 'Cache-Digest' header in a HTTP/2 request would result in a crash when the server actually tries to HTTP/2 PUSH a resource afterwards. Configuring the HTTP/2 feature via "H2Push off" will mitigate this vulnerability for unpatched servers. Apache HTTP Server versiones 2.4.20 hasta 2.4.43.. Un valor especialmente diseñado para el encabezado "Cache-Digest" en una petición HTTP/2 resultaría en un bloqueo cuando el servidor realmente intenta un PUSH HTTP/2 un recurso mas tarde. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-08/msg00068.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-08/msg00071.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00081.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/160392/Apache-2.4.43-mod_http2-Memory-Corruption.html https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html#CVE-2020-9490 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r06f0d87ebb6d59ed8379633f36f72f5b1f79cadfda72ede0830b42cf%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists& • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1589EXPL: 0

Improper invalidation for page table updates by a virtual guest operating system for multiple Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service of the host system via local access. Una invalidación inapropiada de las actualizaciones de la tabla de páginas por parte de un sistema operativo invitado virtual para múltiples procesadores Intel® puede habilitar a un usuario autenticado para permitir potencialmente una denegación de servicio del sistema host por medio de un acceso local. A flaw was found in the way Intel CPUs handle inconsistency between, virtual to physical memory address translations in CPU's local cache and system software's Paging structure entries. A privileged guest user may use this flaw to induce a hardware Machine Check Error on the host processor, resulting in a severe DoS scenario by halting the processor. System software like OS OR Virtual Machine Monitor (VMM) use virtual memory system for storing program instructions and data in memory. Virtual Memory system uses Paging structures like Page Tables and Page Directories to manage system memory. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-12/msg00042.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3916 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3936 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3941 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0026 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0028 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0204 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/I5WWPW4BSZDDW7VHU427XTVXV7ROOFFW https:/&#x • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-226: Sensitive Information in Resource Not Removed Before Reuse •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 324EXPL: 0

TSX Asynchronous Abort condition on some CPUs utilizing speculative execution may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via a side channel with local access. Una condición de tipo TSX Asynchronous Abort en algunas CPU que utilizan ejecución especulativa puede habilitar a un usuario autenticado para permitir potencialmente una divulgación de información por medio de un canal lateral con acceso local. A flaw was found in the way Intel CPUs handle speculative execution of instructions when the TSX Asynchronous Abort (TAA) error occurs. A local authenticated attacker with the ability to monitor execution times could infer the TSX memory state by comparing abort execution times. This could allow information disclosure via this observed side-channel for any TSX transaction being executed while an attacker is able to observe abort timing. Intel's Transactional Synchronisation Extensions (TSX) are set of instructions which enable transactional memory support to improve performance of the multi-threaded applications, in the lock-protected critical sections. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00045.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-12/msg00042.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155375/Slackware-Security-Advisory-Slackware-14.2-kernel-Updates.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/10/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12/10/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/12 • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •

CVSS: 9.0EPSS: 32%CPEs: 47EXPL: 21

In Sudo before 1.8.28, an attacker with access to a Runas ALL sudoer account can bypass certain policy blacklists and session PAM modules, and can cause incorrect logging, by invoking sudo with a crafted user ID. For example, this allows bypass of !root configuration, and USER= logging, for a "sudo -u \#$((0xffffffff))" command. En Sudo anteriores a 1.8.28, un atacante con acceso a una cuenta Runas ALL sudoer puede omitir ciertas listas negras de políticas y módulos PAM de sesión, y puede causar un registro incorrecto, mediante la invocación sudo con un ID de usuario creado. Por ejemplo, esto permite la omisión de la configuración root y el registro USER= para un comando "sudo -u \#$((0xffffffff))". • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/47502 https://github.com/n0w4n/CVE-2019-14287 https://github.com/shallvhack/Sudo-Security-Bypass-CVE-2019-14287 https://github.com/CMNatic/Dockerized-CVE-2019-14287 https://github.com/axax002/sudo-vulnerability-CVE-2019-14287 https://github.com/N3rdyN3xus/CVE-2019-14287 https://github.com/DewmiApsara/CVE-2019-14287 https://github.com/MariliaMeira/CVE-2019-14287 https://github.com/edsonjt81/CVE-2019-14287- https://github.com/SachinthaDeSilva-cmd& • CWE-267: Privilege Defined With Unsafe Actions CWE-755: Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions •

CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 32EXPL: 1

A flaw was found in the "Leaf and Chain" OCSP policy implementation in JSS' CryptoManager versions after 4.4.6, 4.5.3, 4.6.0, where it implicitly trusted the root certificate of a certificate chain. Applications using this policy may not properly verify the chain and could be vulnerable to attacks such as Man in the Middle. Se detectó un fallo en la implementación de la política OCSP "Leaf and Chain" en las versiones de CryptoManager de JSS versiones posteriores a 4.4.6, 4.5.3, 4.6.0, donde confiaba implícitamente en el certificado raíz de una cadena de certificados. Es posible que las aplicaciones que utilizan esta política no verifiquen correctamente la cadena y puedan ser vulnerables a ataques de tipo Man in the Middle. A flaw was found in the "Leaf and Chain" OCSP policy implementation in JSS' CryptoManager, where it implicitly trusted the root certificate of a certificate chain. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3067 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3225 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-14823 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ENEN4DQBE6WOGEP5BQ5X62WZM7ZQEEBG https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/O53NXVKMF7PJCPMCJQHLMSYCUGDHGBVE https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UZZWZLNALV6AOIBIHB3ZMNA5AGZMZAIY https:& • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation CWE-358: Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard •