CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0CVE-2017-12150 – samba: Some code path don't enforce smb signing, when they should
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-12150
It was found that samba before 4.4.16, 4.5.x before 4.5.14, and 4.6.x before 4.6.8 did not enforce "SMB signing" when certain configuration options were enabled. A remote attacker could launch a man-in-the-middle attack and retrieve information in plain-text. Se ha descubierto que Samba en versiones anteriores a la 4.4.16, versiones 4.5.x anteriores a la 4.5.14 y versiones 4.6.x anteriores a la 4.6.8 no cumple "SMB signing" cuando están habilitadas determinadas opciones de configuración. Un atacante remoto podría lanzar un ataque Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) y recuperar información en texto plano. It was found that samba did not enforce "SMB signing" when certain configuration options were enabled. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100918 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039401 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2789 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2790 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2791 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2858 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-12150 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbns03775en_us https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20170 • CWE-300: Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint •
CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 53%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0CVE-2017-12163 – Samba: Server memory information leak over SMB1
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-12163
An information leak flaw was found in the way SMB1 protocol was implemented by Samba before 4.4.16, 4.5.x before 4.5.14, and 4.6.x before 4.6.8. A malicious client could use this flaw to dump server memory contents to a file on the samba share or to a shared printer, though the exact area of server memory cannot be controlled by the attacker. Se ha descubierto una vulnerabilidad de fuga de información en la manera en la que Samba, en versiones anteriores a la 4.4.16, versiones 4.5.x anteriores a la 4.5.14 y versiones 4.6.x anteriores a la 4.6.8, implementó el protocolo SMB1. Un cliente malicioso podría utilizar esta vulnerabilidad para volcar los contenidos de la memoria del servidor en un archivo en el almacenamiento de samba o en una impresora compartida, aunque el atacante no pueda controlar el área exacta de memoria del servidor. An information leak flaw was found in the way SMB1 protocol was implemented by Samba. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100925 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039401 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2789 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2790 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2791 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2858 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-12163 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbns03775en_us https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20170 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 18EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2125 – samba: Unconditional privilege delegation to Kerberos servers in trusted realms
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2125
It was found that Samba before versions 4.5.3, 4.4.8, 4.3.13 always requested forwardable tickets when using Kerberos authentication. A service to which Samba authenticated using Kerberos could subsequently use the ticket to impersonate Samba to other services or domain users. Se ha descubierto que Samba, en versiones anteriores a la 4.5.3, 4.4.8 y 4.3.13, siempre solicitaba tickets que podían reenviarse al emplear la autenticación de Kerberos. Un servicio al que Samba se ha autenticado con Kerberos podría emplear el ticket para suplantar Samba con otros usuarios de servicios o dominios. It was found that Samba always requested forwardable tickets when using Kerberos authentication. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0494.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0495.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0662.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0744.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94988 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037494 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1265 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-2125 https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2016-2125.html https://access.redhat.c • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0CVE-2014-8177 – gluster-swift metadata constraints are not correctly enforced
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-8177
The Red Hat gluster-swift package, as used in Red Hat Gluster Storage (formerly Red Hat Storage Server), allows remote authenticated users to bypass the max_meta_count constraint via multiple crafted requests which exceed the limit when combined. El paquete gluster-swift de Red Hat, tal como se utiliza en Red Hat Gluster Storage (anteriormente Red Hat Storage Server), permite a usuarios remotos autenticados eludir la restricción max_meta_count a través de múltiples peticiones manipuladas que exceden el límite cuando se combinan. A flaw was found in the metadata constraints in Red Hat Gluster Storage's OpenStack Object Storage (swiftonfile). By adding metadata in several separate calls, a malicious user could bypass the max_meta_count constraint, and store more metadata than allowed by the configuration. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1845.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1846.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/08/27/5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257525 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-8177 • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 89%CPEs: 345EXPL: 17CVE-2014-7169 – GNU Bourne-Again Shell (Bash) Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-7169
GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to write to files or possibly have unknown other impact via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-6271. GNU Bash hasta 4.3 bash43-025 procesa cadenas finales después de la definición malformada de funciones en los valores de variables de entorno, lo que permite a atacantes remotos escribir hacia ficheros o posiblemente tener otro impacto desconocido a través de un entorno manipulado, tal y como se ha demostrado por vectores que involucran la característica ForceCommand en sshd OpenSSH, los módulos mod_cgi y mod_cgid en el Apache HTTP Server, scripts ejecutados por clientes DHCP no especificados, y otras situaciones en la cual establecer el entorno ocurre a través de un límite privilegiado de la ejecución de Bash. Nota: Esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una solución incompleta para CVE-2014-6271. It was found that the fix for CVE-2014-6271 was incomplete, and Bash still allowed certain characters to be injected into other environments via specially crafted environment variables. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34777 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34895 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34839 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36503 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36504 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34766 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/35115 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36933 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34765 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34860 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34879 • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-228: Improper Handling of Syntactically Invalid Structure •