Page 3 of 79 results (0.011 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 1

A flaw was found in Undertow. A buffer leak on the incoming WebSocket PONG message may lead to memory exhaustion. This flaw allows an attacker to cause a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is availability. Se ha encontrado un fallo en Undertow. • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3690 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991299 https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/commit/c7e84a0b7efced38506d7d1dfea5902366973877 https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1935 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime •

CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0

A flaw was discovered in all versions of Undertow before Undertow 2.2.0.Final, where HTTP request smuggling related to CVE-2017-2666 is possible against HTTP/1.x and HTTP/2 due to permitting invalid characters in an HTTP request. This flaw allows an attacker to poison a web-cache, perform an XSS attack, or obtain sensitive information from request other than their own. Se detectó un fallo en todas las versiones de Undertow versiones anteriores a Undertow 2.2.0.Final, donde el tráfico malicioso de peticiones HTTP relacionado a CVE-2017-2666, es posible contra HTTP/1.x y HTTP/2 debido a que permite caracteres no válidos en una petición HTTP. Este fallo permite a un atacante envenenar una caché web, llevar a cabo un ataque de tipo XSS y obtener información confidencial de una petición distinta a la suya A flaw was discovered in Undertow where HTTP request smuggling related to CVE-2017-2666 is possible against HTTP/1.x and HTTP/2 due to permitting invalid characters in an HTTP request. This flaw allows an attacker to poison a web-cache, perform an XSS attack, or obtain sensitive information from request other than their own. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1785049 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r6603513ea8afbf6857fd77ca5888ec8385d0af493baa4250e28c351c%40%3Cdev.cxf.apache.org%3E https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220210-0015 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-10687 • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0

The issue appears to be that JBoss EAP 6.4.21 does not parse the field-name in accordance to RFC7230[1] as it returns a 200 instead of a 400. El problema parece ser que JBoss EAP versión 6.4.21, no analiza el nombre de campo de acuerdo con RFC7230[1] ya que devuelve 200 en lugar de 400 A flaw was discovered in JBoss EAP, where it does not process the header field-name in accordance with RFC7230. Whitespace between the header field-name and colon is processed, resulting in an HTTP response code of 200 instead of a bad request of 400. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-1710 • CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0

A flaw was found in Undertow when using Remoting as shipped in Red Hat Jboss EAP before version 7.2.4. A memory leak in HttpOpenListener due to holding remote connections indefinitely may lead to denial of service. Versions before undertow 2.0.25.SP1 and jboss-remoting 5.0.14.SP1 are believed to be vulnerable. Se encontró una falla en Undertow al usar Remoting como se envió en Red Hat Jboss EAP anterior a la versión 7.2.4. Una filtrado de memoria en HttpOpenListener debido a mantener conexiones remotas indefinidamente puede conllevar a una denegación de servicio. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780445 https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JBEAP-16695 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220211-0002 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-19343 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-404: Improper Resource Shutdown or Release •

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 1

A cross-site scripting (XSS) flaw was found in RESTEasy in versions before 3.11.1.Final and before 4.5.3.Final, where it did not properly handle URL encoding when the RESTEASY003870 exception occurs. An attacker could use this flaw to launch a reflected XSS attack. Se encontró un fallo de tipo cross-site scripting (XSS) en RESTEasy en versiones anteriores a 3.11.1.Final y anteriores a 4.5.3.Final, donde no manejaba apropiadamente la codificación de URL cuando ocurre la excepción RESTEASY003870. Un atacante podría usar este fallo para lanzar un ataque XSS reflejado A cross-site scripting (XSS) flaw was found in RESTEasy, where it did not properly handle URL encoding when the RESTEASY003870 exception occurs. An attacker could use this flaw to launch a reflected XSS attack. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814974 https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/issues/7248 https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RESTEASY-2519 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210706-0008 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-10688 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •