CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2016-8653
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-8653
It was found that the JMX endpoint of Red Hat JBoss Fuse 6, and Red Hat A-MQ 6 deserializes the credentials passed to it. An attacker could use this flaw to launch a denial of service attack. Se ha detectado que el endpoint JMX de Red Hat JBoss Fuse 6 y Red Hat A-MQ 6 deserializa las credenciales que se les pasa. Un atacante podría explotar este error para iniciar un ataque de denegación de servicio (DoS). • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94544 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-8653 • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0CVE-2017-12196 – undertow: Client can use bogus uri in Digest authentication
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-12196
undertow before versions 1.4.18.SP1, 2.0.2.Final, 1.4.24.Final was found vulnerable when using Digest authentication, the server does not ensure that the value of URI in the Authorization header matches the URI in HTTP request line. This allows the attacker to cause a MITM attack and access the desired content on the server. Se ha descubierto que undertow, en sus versiones 1.4.18.SP1, 2.0.2.Final y 1.4.24.Final, es vulnerable al usar la autenticación Digest, ya que el servidor no garantiza que el valor del URI en la cabecera Authorization coincida con el URIb en la línea de petición HTTP. Esto permite que el atacante provoque un ataque Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) y acceda al contenido que desee en el servidor. It was discovered that when using Digest authentication, the server does not ensure that the value of the URI in the authorization header matches the URI in the HTTP request line. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0478 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0479 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0480 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0481 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1525 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2405 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3768 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-12196 https://issues.jboss.org/browse/UNDERTOW-1190 https://access.redhat.com/sec • CWE-287: Improper Authentication CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 19EXPL: 1CVE-2015-7501 – apache-commons-collections: InvokerTransformer code execution during deserialisation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-7501
Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x and 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x and 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x, and 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x; and Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x y 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x y 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x y 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x y Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 permiten que atacantes remotos ejecuten comandos arbitrarios mediante un objeto Java serializado manipulado. Esto está relacionado con la librería ACC (Apache Commons Collections). It was found that the Apache commons-collections library permitted code execution when deserializing objects involving a specially constructed chain of classes. A remote attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the application using the commons-collections library. • https://github.com/ianxtianxt/CVE-2015-7501 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2500.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2501.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2502.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2514.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2516.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2517.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2521.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2522.html http://rhn.redhat. • CWE-284: Improper Access Control CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2014-8175 – Fuse: insufficient access permissions checks when accessing Hawtio console
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-8175
Red Hat JBoss Fuse before 6.2.0 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended restrictions and access the HawtIO console by leveraging an account defined in the users.properties file. Red Hat JBoss Fuse anterior a 6.2.0 permite a usuarios remotos autenticados evadir las restricciones y acceder a la consola HawtIO mediante el aprovechamiento de una cuenta definida en el fichero de propiedades de usuarios. It was found that JBoss Fuse would allow any user defined in the users.properties file to access the HawtIO console without having a valid admin role. This could allow a remote attacker to bypass intended authentication HawtIO console access restrictions. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1176.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1177.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-8175 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205112 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls CWE-862: Missing Authorization •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2013-7397 – async-http-client: SSL/TLS certificate verification is disabled under certain conditions
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-7397
Async Http Client (aka AHC or async-http-client) before 1.9.0 skips X.509 certificate verification unless both a keyStore location and a trustStore location are explicitly set, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof HTTPS servers by presenting an arbitrary certificate during use of a typical AHC configuration, as demonstrated by a configuration that does not send client certificates. Async Http Client (también conocido como AHC o async-http-client) anterior a 1.9.0 salta la verificación los certificados X.509 a no ser que tanto una localización keyStore y una localización trustStore estén configuradas explícitamente, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle falsificar servidores HTTPS mediante la presentación de un certificado arbitrario durante el uso de una configuración AHC típica, tal y como fue demostrado por una configuración que no envía certificados de cliente. It was found that async-http-client would disable SSL/TLS certificate verification under certain conditions, for example if HTTPS communication also used client certificates. A man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacker could use this flaw to spoof a valid certificate. • http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/08/26/1 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0850.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0851.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1176.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1551.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/69316 https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/issues/352 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ff8dcfe29377088ab655fda9d585dccd5b1f07fabd94ae84fd60a7f8%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E https://l • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •