Page 3 of 20 results (0.011 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

An insecure modification vulnerability in the /etc/passwd file was found in all versions of OpenShift ServiceMesh (maistra) before 1.0.8 in the openshift/istio-kialia-rhel7-operator-container. An attacker with access to the container could use this flaw to modify /etc/passwd and escalate their privileges. Se encontró una vulnerabilidad de modificación no segura en el archivo /etc/passwd en OpenShift ServiceMesh (maistra) todas las versiones anteriores a 1.0.8 en el openshift/istio-kialia-rhel7-operator-container. Un atacante con acceso al contenedor podría utilizar este fallo para modificar el archivo /etc/passwd y escalar sus privilegios. An insecure modification vulnerability in the /etc/passwd file was found in the openshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel7-operator. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2020-1704 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-1704 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793305 • CWE-266: Incorrect Privilege Assignment CWE-732: Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

Istio versions 1.2.10 (End of Life) and prior, 1.3 through 1.3.7, and 1.4 through 1.4.3 allows authentication bypass. The Authentication Policy exact-path matching logic can allow unauthorized access to HTTP paths even if they are configured to be only accessed after presenting a valid JWT token. For example, an attacker can add a ? or # character to a URI that would otherwise satisfy an exact-path match. Las versiones Istio 1.2.10 (End of Life) y anteriores, 1.3 a 1.3.7, y 1.4 a 1.4.3 permiten la omisión de autenticación. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0477 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2020-8595 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2020-8595 https://github.com/istio/istio/commits/master https://istio.io/news/security https://istio.io/news/security/istio-security-2020-001 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8595 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798247 • CWE-285: Improper Authorization CWE-287: Improper Authentication •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a los bucles de recursos, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante crea múltiples flujos de solicitud y baraja continuamente la prioridad de los flujos de una manera que provoca un cambio considerable en el árbol de prioridad. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00014.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2692 https:/ • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 3%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de configuraciones, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/16 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2766 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2796 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2861 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2925 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2939 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2955 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una fuga de encabezado, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00014.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/16 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2745 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2746 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2775 https&# • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •