Page 3 of 15 results (0.019 seconds)

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0

An infinite loop flaw was found in the e1000 NIC emulator of the QEMU. This issue occurs while processing transmits (tx) descriptors in process_tx_desc if various descriptor fields are initialized with invalid values. This flaw allows a guest to consume CPU cycles on the host, resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. Se ha encontrado un fallo de bucle infinito en el emulador NIC e1000 de QEMU. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930087 https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/3de46e6fc489c52c9431a8a832ad8170a7569bd8 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/09/msg00008.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-02/msg07428.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-27 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220425-0003 https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/02/25/2 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-20257 • CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 54EXPL: 0

Apache HTTP Server versions 2.4.20 to 2.4.43. A specially crafted value for the 'Cache-Digest' header in a HTTP/2 request would result in a crash when the server actually tries to HTTP/2 PUSH a resource afterwards. Configuring the HTTP/2 feature via "H2Push off" will mitigate this vulnerability for unpatched servers. Apache HTTP Server versiones 2.4.20 hasta 2.4.43.. Un valor especialmente diseñado para el encabezado "Cache-Digest" en una petición HTTP/2 resultaría en un bloqueo cuando el servidor realmente intenta un PUSH HTTP/2 un recurso mas tarde. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-08/msg00068.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-08/msg00071.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00081.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/160392/Apache-2.4.43-mod_http2-Memory-Corruption.html https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html#CVE-2020-9490 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r06f0d87ebb6d59ed8379633f36f72f5b1f79cadfda72ede0830b42cf%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists& • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •

CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 0

Pivotal RabbitMQ, versions prior to v3.7.18, and RabbitMQ for PCF, versions 1.15.x prior to 1.15.13, versions 1.16.x prior to 1.16.6, and versions 1.17.x prior to 1.17.3, contain two components, the virtual host limits page, and the federation management UI, which do not properly sanitize user input. A remote authenticated malicious user with administrative access could craft a cross site scripting attack that would gain access to virtual hosts and policy management information. Pivotal RabbitMQ, versiones anteriores a v3.7.18 y RabbitMQ for PCF, versiones 1.15.x anteriores a 1.15.13, versiones 1.16.x anteriores a 1.16.6 y versiones 1.17.x anteriores a 1.17.3, contienen dos componentes, la página de límites de host virtual y la UI de administración federation que no sanean apropiadamente la entrada del usuario. Un usuario malicioso autenticado remoto con acceso administrativo podría crear un ataque de tipo cross-site scripting que obtendría acceso a hosts virtuales e información de gestión de políticas. A vulnerability was found in the rabbitmq-server. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0078 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/07/msg00011.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EEQ6O7PMNJKYFMQYHAB55L423GYK63SO https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PYTGR3D5FW2O25RXZOTIZMOD2HAUVBE4 https://pivotal.io/security/cve-2019-11281 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-11281 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764329 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •

CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 81%CPEs: 84EXPL: 2

The EPHEMERAL coder in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files via a crafted image. El codificador EPHEMERAL en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.3-10 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-1 permite a atacantes remotos eliminar archivos arbitrarios a través de una imagen manipulada. It was discovered that certain ImageMagick coders and pseudo-protocols did not properly prevent security sensitive operations when processing specially crafted images. A remote attacker could create a specially crafted image that, when processed by an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities, would allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files. ImageMagick contains an unspecified vulnerability that could allow users to delete files by using ImageMagick's 'ephemeral' pseudo protocol, which deletes files after reading. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39767 http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/blob/a01518e08c840577cabd7d3ff291a9ba735f7276/ChangeLog http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00028.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00051.html http&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 93%CPEs: 84EXPL: 1

The (1) HTTP and (2) FTP coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted image. Los codificadores (1) HTTP y (2) FTP en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.3-10 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-1 permiten a atacantes remotos llevar a cabo ataques de falsificación de peticiones del lado del servidor (SSRF) a través de una imagen manipulada. A server-side request forgery flaw was discovered in the way ImageMagick processed certain images. A remote attacker could exploit this flaw to mislead an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities into, for example, performing HTTP(S) requests or opening FTP sessions via specially crafted images. ImageMagick contains an unspecified vulnerability that allows attackers to perform server-side request forgery (SSRF) via a crafted image. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39767 http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/blob/a01518e08c840577cabd7d3ff291a9ba735f7276/ChangeLog http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00028.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00051.html http&# • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •