Page 3 of 52 results (0.014 seconds)

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

Ruby through 2.4.7, 2.5.x through 2.5.6, and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows HTTP Response Splitting. If a program using WEBrick inserts untrusted input into the response header, an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header, and inject malicious content to deceive clients. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-17742, which addressed the CRLF vector, but did not address an isolated CR or an isolated LF. Ruby versiones hasta 2.4.7, versiones 2.5.x hasta 2.5.6 y versiones 2.6.x hasta 2.6.4, permite HTTP Response Splitting. Si un programa que utiliza WEBrick inserta información no segura en el encabezado de respuesta, un atacante puede explotarlo para insertar un carácter newline para dividir un encabezado e inyectar contenido malicioso para engañar a los clientes. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00041.html https://hackerone.com/reports/331984 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/11/msg00025.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/12/msg00009.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00027.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00033.html https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/31 https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/32 https://security • CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') •

CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

In Ruby before 2.2.10, 2.3.x before 2.3.7, 2.4.x before 2.4.4, 2.5.x before 2.5.1, and 2.6.0-preview1, the Dir.open, Dir.new, Dir.entries and Dir.empty? methods do not check NULL characters. When using the corresponding method, unintentional directory traversal may be performed. En Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.10, versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.7, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.4, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.1 y la versión 2.6.0-preview1, los métodos Dir.open, Dir.new, Dir.entries y Dir.empty? no comprueban los caracteres NULL. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103739 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042004 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2028 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0542 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0591 https://access.redhat.com/errata&#x • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0

The Basic authentication code in WEBrick library in Ruby before 2.2.8, 2.3.x before 2.3.5, and 2.4.x through 2.4.1 allows remote attackers to inject terminal emulator escape sequences into its log and possibly execute arbitrary commands via a crafted user name. El código de autenticación Basic en la biblioteca WEBrick en Ruby en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.8, 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.5 y 2.4.x hasta la 2.4.1 permite que atacantes remotos inyecten secuencias de escape del emulador del terminal en su registro y que puedan ejecutar comandos arbitrarios mediante un nombre de usuario manipulado. It was found that WEBrick did not sanitize all its log messages. If logs were printed in a terminal, an attacker could interact with the terminal via the use of escape sequences. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100853 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039363 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042004 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3485 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0378 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0583 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0585 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/07/msg00012.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201710-18 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3528-1 https://usn&# • CWE-117: Improper Output Neutralization for Logs CWE-287: Improper Authentication •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

The URI.decode_www_form_component method in Ruby before 1.9.2-p330 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (catastrophic regular expression backtracking, resource consumption, or application crash) via a crafted string. El método URI.decode_www_form_component en versiones de Ruby anteriores a la 1.9.2-p330 permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una denegación de servicio (expresión regular catastrófica, consumo de recursos o bloqueo de la aplicación) utilizando un string manipulado. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/07/13/6 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032874 https://github.com/ruby/www.ruby-lang.org/issues/817 https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2014/08/19/ruby-1-9-2-p330-released • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 1

Ruby through 2.2.7, 2.3.x through 2.3.4, and 2.4.x through 2.4.1 can expose arbitrary memory during a JSON.generate call. The issues lies in using strdup in ext/json/ext/generator/generator.c, which will stop after encountering a '\0' byte, returning a pointer to a string of length zero, which is not the length stored in space_len. Ruby hasta la versión 2.2.7, 2.3.x hasta la 2.3.4, y 2.4.x hasta la 2.4.1 puede exponer memoria arbitraria durante una llamada JSON.generate. Los problemas surgen al usar strdup en ext/json/ext/generator/generator.c, el cual se detendría después de encontrar un byte '\0', devolviendo un puntero a un string de longitud cero, que no es la longitud almacenada en space_len. A buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the JSON extension of ruby. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100890 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039363 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042004 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3485 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0378 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0583 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0585 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13853 https://github.com/flori/json/commit/8f782fd8e181d9cfe9387ded43a5ca9692266b85 https://hackerone.com/reports/209949 https://lists. • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •