CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2011-3624
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2011-3624
Various methods in WEBrick::HTTPRequest in Ruby 1.9.2 and 1.8.7 and earlier do not validate the X-Forwarded-For, X-Forwarded-Host and X-Forwarded-Server headers in requests, which might allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary text into log files or bypass intended address parsing via a crafted header. Varios métodos en WEBrick::HTTPRequest en Ruby versiones 1.9.2 y versiones 1.8.7 y anteriores, no comprueban los encabezados X-Fordered-For, X-Fordered-Host y X-Fordered-Server en las peticiones, lo que podría permitir a los atacantes remotos inyectar texto arbitrario en archivos de registro o omitir el análisis de direcciones previsto por medio de un encabezado diseñado. • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2011-3624 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-3624 https://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5418 https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-3624 • CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2019-16254 – ruby: HTTP response splitting in WEBrick
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-16254
Ruby through 2.4.7, 2.5.x through 2.5.6, and 2.6.x through 2.6.4 allows HTTP Response Splitting. If a program using WEBrick inserts untrusted input into the response header, an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header, and inject malicious content to deceive clients. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-17742, which addressed the CRLF vector, but did not address an isolated CR or an isolated LF. Ruby versiones hasta 2.4.7, versiones 2.5.x hasta 2.5.6 y versiones 2.6.x hasta 2.6.4, permite HTTP Response Splitting. Si un programa que utiliza WEBrick inserta información no segura en el encabezado de respuesta, un atacante puede explotarlo para insertar un carácter newline para dividir un encabezado e inyectar contenido malicioso para engañar a los clientes. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00041.html https://hackerone.com/reports/331984 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/11/msg00025.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/12/msg00009.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00027.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00033.html https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/31 https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/32 https://security • CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') CWE-113: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') •
CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0CVE-2018-8780 – ruby: Unintentional directory traversal by poisoned NULL byte in Dir
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-8780
In Ruby before 2.2.10, 2.3.x before 2.3.7, 2.4.x before 2.4.4, 2.5.x before 2.5.1, and 2.6.0-preview1, the Dir.open, Dir.new, Dir.entries and Dir.empty? methods do not check NULL characters. When using the corresponding method, unintentional directory traversal may be performed. En Ruby, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.10, versiones 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.7, versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.4, versiones 2.5.x anteriores a la 2.5.1 y la versión 2.6.0-preview1, los métodos Dir.open, Dir.new, Dir.entries y Dir.empty? no comprueban los caracteres NULL. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-07/msg00036.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103739 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042004 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3729 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3730 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3731 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2028 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0542 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0591 https://access.redhat.com/errata&#x • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0CVE-2017-10784 – ruby: Escape sequence injection vulnerability in the Basic authentication of WEBrick
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-10784
The Basic authentication code in WEBrick library in Ruby before 2.2.8, 2.3.x before 2.3.5, and 2.4.x through 2.4.1 allows remote attackers to inject terminal emulator escape sequences into its log and possibly execute arbitrary commands via a crafted user name. El código de autenticación Basic en la biblioteca WEBrick en Ruby en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.8, 2.3.x anteriores a la 2.3.5 y 2.4.x hasta la 2.4.1 permite que atacantes remotos inyecten secuencias de escape del emulador del terminal en su registro y que puedan ejecutar comandos arbitrarios mediante un nombre de usuario manipulado. It was found that WEBrick did not sanitize all its log messages. If logs were printed in a terminal, an attacker could interact with the terminal via the use of escape sequences. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/100853 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039363 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1042004 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3485 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0378 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0583 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0585 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/07/msg00012.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201710-18 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3528-1 https://usn&# • CWE-117: Improper Output Neutralization for Logs CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2014-6438
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-6438
The URI.decode_www_form_component method in Ruby before 1.9.2-p330 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (catastrophic regular expression backtracking, resource consumption, or application crash) via a crafted string. El método URI.decode_www_form_component en versiones de Ruby anteriores a la 1.9.2-p330 permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una denegación de servicio (expresión regular catastrófica, consumo de recursos o bloqueo de la aplicación) utilizando un string manipulado. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/07/13/6 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032874 https://github.com/ruby/www.ruby-lang.org/issues/817 https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2014/08/19/ruby-1-9-2-p330-released • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •