CVE-2004-0235
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0235
Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in LHA 1.14 allow remote attackers or local users to create arbitrary files via an LHA archive containing filenames with (1) .. sequences or (2) absolute pathnames with double leading slashes ("//absolute/path"). Múltiples vulnerabilidades de atravesamiento de directorios en LHA 1.14 permite a atacantes locales o usuarios locales crear ficheros arbitrarios mediante un archivo LHA conteniendo nombres de fichero con secuencias (1) ".." (punto punto) o (2) rutas absolutas con barra inicial doble ("//ruta/absoluta"). • http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a&anuncio=000840 http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-May/020776.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=108422737918885&w=2 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200405-02.xml http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-515 http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2004-May/msg00005.html http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-178.html http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-179.html h •
CVE-2004-0234
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0234
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the get_header function in header.c for LHA 1.14, as used in products such as Barracuda Spam Firewall, allow remote attackers or local users to execute arbitrary code via long directory or file names in an LHA archive, which triggers the overflow when testing or extracting the archive. Múltiples desbordamientos de búfer basados en la pila en la función get_header de header.c de LHA 1.14 utilizado en productos como Barracuda Spam Firewall, permite a atacantes remotos o a usuarios locales ejecutar código arbitrario mediante nombres de fichero o de directorio largos en un archivo LHA, lo que dispara el desbordamiento cuando se prueba o se extrae un fichero. • http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2006-04/0059.html http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a&anuncio=000840 http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-May/020776.html http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-May/020778.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=108422737918885&w=2 http://secunia.com/advisories/19514 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200405-02.xml http://securitytracker.com/id?1015866 http://www.debian.org/securi • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVE-2003-1481 – CommuniGate Pro Webmail 4.0.6 - Session Hijacking
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2003-1481
CommuniGate Pro 3.1 through 4.0.6 sends the session ID in the referer field for an HTTP request for an image, which allows remote attackers to hijack mail sessions via an e-mail with an IMG tag that references a malicious URL that captures the referer. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/27 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3290 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/320438 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7501 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/11932 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVE-2002-2375
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2002-2375
Directory traversal vulnerability in CommuniGate Pro 4.0b4 and possibly earlier versions allows remote attackers to list the contents of the WebUser directory and its parent directory via a (1) .. (dot dot) or (2) . (dot) in a URL. NOTE: it is not clear whether this issue reveals any more information regarding directory structure than is already available to any CommuniGate Pro user, although there is a possibility that it could be used to infer product version information. • http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2002-07/0016.html http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/9463.php • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •
CVE-2000-1002 – PragmaSys TelnetServer 2000 - rexec Buffer Overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2000-1002
POP3 daemon in Stalker CommuniGate Pro 3.3.2 generates different error messages for invalid usernames versus invalid passwords, which allows remote attackers to determine valid email addresses on the server for SPAM attacks. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/20175 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/139523 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1792 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/5363 •