CVE-2012-2739
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2012-2739
Oracle Java SE before 7 Update 6, and OpenJDK 7 before 7u6 build 12 and 8 before build 39, computes hash values without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via crafted input to an application that maintains a hash table. Oracle Java SE anteriores a 7 Update 6, y OpenJDK 7 anteriores a 7u6 build 12 y 8 anteriores a build 39, calculan los valores de hash sin restringir la posibilidad de provocar colisiones hash previsibles, lo que permite a atacantes dependientes de contexto provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de CPU) a través de la manipulación de una entrada para la aplicación que mantiene la tabla de valores hash. • http://armoredbarista.blogspot.de/2012/02/investigating-hashdos-issue.html http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-May/010238.html http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/903934 http://www.nruns.com/_downloads/advisory28122011.pdf http://www.ocert.org/advisories/ocert-2011-003.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/06/15/12 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/06/17/1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750533 • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVE-2012-5373
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2012-5373
Oracle Java SE 7 and earlier, and OpenJDK 7 and earlier, computes hash values without properly restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via crafted input to an application that maintains a hash table, as demonstrated by a universal multicollision attack against the MurmurHash3 algorithm, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-2739. Oracle Java SE 7 y anteriores, y OpenJDK 7 y anteriores, calcula los valores hash sin restringir la posibilidad de provocar colisiones hash previsibles, lo que permite a atacantes dependientes de contexto provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de CPU) a través de la manipulación de una entrada a la aplicación que mantiene la tabla de valores hash, como se demostró con un ataque universal multicollision contra el algoritmo MurmurHash3, una vulnerabilidad diferente a CVE-2012-2739. • http://2012.appsec-forum.ch/conferences/#c17 http://asfws12.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/asfws2012-jean_philippe_aumasson-martin_bosslet-hash_flooding_dos_reloaded.pdf http://www.ocert.org/advisories/ocert-2012-001.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56673 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880705 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/80299 https://www.131002.net/data/talks/appsec12_slides.pdf • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVE-2009-1896
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-1896
The Java Web Start framework in IcedTea in OpenJDK before 1.6.0.0-20.b16.fc10 on Fedora 10, and before 1.6.0.0-27.b16.fc11 on Fedora 11, trusts an entire application when at least one of the listed jar files is trusted, which allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code without the untrusted-code restrictions via a crafted application, related to NetX. La Java Web Start framework en IcedTea de OpenJDK en versiones anteriores a v1.6.0.0-20.b16.fc10 de Fedora 10, y anteriores a 1.6.0.0-27.b16.fc11 en Fedora 11, confía en toda una aplicación cuando al menos uno de los ficheros jar listados es confiable, lo que permite a atacantes depedientes del contexto ejecutar código de su elección sin restricciones de código no confiable a través de una aplicación modificada, relacionado con NetX. • http://secunia.com/advisories/36162 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:209 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512101 https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-August/msg00310.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-August/msg00325.html • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVE-2009-0794
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-0794
Integer overflow in the PulseAudioTargetDataL class in src/java/org/classpath/icedtea/pulseaudio/PulseAudioTargetDataLine.java in Pulse-Java, as used in OpenJDK 1.6.0.0 and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (applet crash) via a crafted Pulse Audio source data line. Desbordamiento de entero en la clase PulseAudioTargetDataL de src/java/org/classpath/icedtea/pulseaudio/PulseAudioTargetDataLine.java de Pulse-Java, cuando es utilizado en OpenJDK v1.6.0.0 y otros productos, permite a usuarios remotos causar una denegación de servicio (caída del applet) a traves de una línea de datos fuente de Pulse Audio modificada. • http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/2009-February/004729.html http://secunia.com/advisories/34623 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:137 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:162 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/0965 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492367 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/50383 https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-April/msg00203.html https:/ • CWE-189: Numeric Errors •
CVE-2009-0581 – LittleCms memory leak
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-0581
Memory leak in LittleCMS (aka lcms or liblcms) before 1.18beta2, as used in Firefox 3.1beta, OpenJDK, and GIMP, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and application crash) via a crafted image file. Fuga de memoria en versiones de LittleCMS (alias LCMS o liblcms) anteriores a la 1.18beta2, tal como se utiliza en Firefox 3.1beta, OpenJDK, y el GIMP, permite causar, a atacantes dependientes de contexto, una denegación de servicio (mediante consumo de memoria y caida de la aplicación) a través de un archivo de imagen debidamente modificado. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-03/msg00004.html http://scary.beasts.org/security/CESA-2009-003.html http://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2009/03/littlecms-vulnerabilities.html http://secunia.com/advisories/34367 http://secunia.com/advisories/34382 http://secunia.com/advisories/34400 http://secunia.com/advisories/34408 http://secunia.com/advisories/34418 http://secunia.com/advisories/34442 http://secunia.com/advisories/34450 http://secunia.com/advisories/34454 • CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime •