Page 3 of 117 results (0.015 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 52EXPL: 3

glibc contains a vulnerability that allows specially crafted LD_LIBRARY_PATH values to manipulate the heap/stack, causing them to alias, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. Please note that additional hardening changes have been made to glibc to prevent manipulation of stack and heap memory but these issues are not directly exploitable, as such they have not been given a CVE. This affects glibc 2.25 and earlier. Glibc contiene una vulnerabilidad que permite que los valores LD_LIBRARY_PATH especialmente creados para manipular la región heap/stack de la memoria, generando entonces un alias, lo que podría conllevar a la ejecución del código arbitrario. Tenga en cuenta que se han realizado cambios de refuerzo adicionales en glibc para evitar la manipulación del stack y heap de la memoria de almacenamiento dinámico, pero estos problemas no se pueden explotar directamente, por lo que no se les ha otorgado un CVE. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42276 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42274 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42275 http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154361/Cisco-Device-Hardcoded-Credentials-GNU-glibc-BusyBox.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Sep/7 http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3887 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99127 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038712 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1479 https://access.redhat.com/errata/ • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 12EXPL: 7

The (1) EPHEMERAL, (2) HTTPS, (3) MVG, (4) MSL, (5) TEXT, (6) SHOW, (7) WIN, and (8) PLT coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via shell metacharacters in a crafted image, aka "ImageTragick." Los codificadores (1) EPHEMERAL, (2) HTTPS, (3) MVG, (4) MSL, (5) TEXT, (6) SHOW, (7) WIN y (8) PLT en ImageMagick en versiones anteriores a 6.9.3-10 y 7.x en versiones anteriores a 7.0.1-1 permiten a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de metacaracteres shell en una imagen manipulada, también conocido como "ImageTragick". It was discovered that ImageMagick did not properly sanitize certain input before passing it to the delegate functionality. A remote attacker could create a specially crafted image that, when processed by an application using ImageMagick or an unsuspecting user using the ImageMagick utilities, would lead to arbitrary execution of shell commands with the privileges of the user running the application. ImageMagick contains an improper input validation vulnerability that affects the EPHEMERAL, HTTPS, MVG, MSL, TEXT, SHOW, WIN, and PLT coders. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39767 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39791 https://github.com/Hood3dRob1n/CVE-2016-3714 https://github.com/jpeanut/ImageTragick-CVE-2016-3714-RShell https://github.com/chusiang/CVE-2016-3714.ansible.role https://github.com/JoshMorrison99/CVE-2016-3714 https://github.com/tommiionfire/CVE-2016-3714 http://git.imagemagick.org/repos/ImageMagick/blob/a01518e08c840577cabd7d3ff291a9ba735f7276/ChangeLog http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 94%CPEs: 109EXPL: 0

The RFC 5011 implementation in rdata.c in ISC BIND 9.7.x and 9.8.x before 9.8.5-P2, 9.8.6b1, 9.9.x before 9.9.3-P2, and 9.9.4b1, and DNSco BIND 9.9.3-S1 before 9.9.3-S1-P1 and 9.9.4-S1b1, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and named daemon exit) via a query with a malformed RDATA section that is not properly handled during construction of a log message, as exploited in the wild in July 2013. La implementación RFC en rdata.c en ISC BIND 9.7.x y 9.8.x anterior a 9.8.5-P2, 9.8.6b1, 9.9.x anterior a 9.9.3-P2, y 9.9.4b1, y DNSco BIND 9.9.3-S1 anterior a 9.9.3-S1-P1 y 9.9.4-S1b1, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (fallo de aserción y salida de demonio) a través de una petición con una sección RDATA manipulada que se maneja adecuadamente durante la contrucción de mensaje de log. Ha sido explotada "in the wild" en Julio de 2013. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service condition on vulnerable installations of ISC BIND. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of an rdata section with a length that is less than four. • http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-08/0030.html http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-10/0103.html http://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2014-1244 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-August/113108.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-August/113251.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-08/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-08/msg00018.html http://rhn. •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 14%CPEs: 88EXPL: 2

Stack-based buffer overflow in the zseticcspace function in zicc.c in Ghostscript 8.61 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a postscript (.ps) file containing a long Range array in a .seticcspace operator. Desbordamiento de búfer basado en pila en la función zseticcspace de zicc.c en Ghostscript 8.61 y anteriores permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código de su elección a través de un archivo postscript (.ps) que contiene un array de Range (rango) largo en un operador .seticcspace. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/31309 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-02/msg00009.html http://scary.beasts.org/security/CESA-2008-001.html http://secunia.com/advisories/29101 http://secunia.com/advisories/29103 http://secunia.com/advisories/29112 http://secunia.com/advisories/29135 http://secunia.com/advisories/29147 http://secunia.com/advisories/29154 http://secunia.com/advisories/29169 http://secunia.com/advisories/29196 http://secunia.com/ • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-121: Stack-based Buffer Overflow •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 48EXPL: 0

Buffer overflow in the Mono.Math.BigInteger class in Mono 1.2.5.1 and earlier allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors related to Reduce in Montgomery-based Pow methods. El desbordamiento de búfer en la clase Mono.Math.BigInteger en Mono versión 1.2.5.1 y anteriores permite que los atacantes dependiendo del contexto ejecutar código arbitrario por medio de vectores no específicos relacionados a Reduce en métodos Pow basados en Montgomery. • http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=134361&action=view http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197067 http://secunia.com/advisories/27439 http://secunia.com/advisories/27493 http://secunia.com/advisories/27511 http://secunia.com/advisories/27583 http://secunia.com/advisories/27612 http://secunia.com/advisories/27639 http://secunia.com/advisories/27937 http://www.debian.org/security/2007/dsa-1397 http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200711-10.xml http:/ • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •