Page 3 of 19 results (0.012 seconds)

CVSS: 2.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 19EXPL: 1

The Mailer component in Evolution 2.26.1 and earlier uses world-readable permissions for the .evolution directory, and certain directories and files under .evolution/ related to local mail, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading these files. El componente Mailer en Evolution v2.26.1 y versiones anteriores utiliza permisos de lectura para todos para el directorio .evolution, y determinados directorios y ficheros bajo .evolution/ relacionados con el correo local, lo cual permite a usuarios locales obtener información sensible a través de la lectura de esos ficheros. • http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526409 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581604 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/05/12/6 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/34921 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498648 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 59%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

Format string vulnerability in the emf_multipart_encrypted function in mail/em-format.c in Evolution 2.12.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted encrypted message, as demonstrated using the Version field. Una vulnerabilidad de cadena de formato en la función emf_multipart_encrypted en el archivo mail/em-format.c en Evolution versión 2.12.3 y anteriores, permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario por medio de un mensaje encriptado diseñado, tal y como es demostrado usando el campo Version. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2008-03/msg00003.html http://secunia.com/advisories/29057 http://secunia.com/advisories/29163 http://secunia.com/advisories/29210 http://secunia.com/advisories/29244 http://secunia.com/advisories/29258 http://secunia.com/advisories/29264 http://secunia.com/advisories/29317 http://secunia.com/advisories/30437 http://secunia.com/advisories/30491 http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2008-8/advisory http://security.gentoo.org/glsa& • CWE-134: Use of Externally-Controlled Format String •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 5%CPEs: 1EXPL: 2

Evolution 2.8.1 and earlier does not properly use the --status-fd argument when invoking GnuPG, which prevents Evolution from visually distinguishing between signed and unsigned portions of OpenPGP messages with multiple components, which allows remote attackers to forge the contents of a message without detection. Evolution 2.8.1 y anteriores no utilizan adecuadamente el argumento --status-fd al invocar a GnuPG, lo cual provoca que Evolution no distinga visualmente entre trozos firmados y no firmados de mensajes OpenPGP con múltiples componentes, lo cual permite a atacantes remotos falsificar el contenido de un mensaje si ser detectado. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/29691 http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2007-March/030514.html http://secunia.com/advisories/24412 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2353 http://www.coresecurity.com/?action=item&id=1687 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/461958/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/461958/30/7710/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22760 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017727 http://www.vupen.com/english/ad •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

Integer overflow in camel-lock-helper in Evolution 2.0.2 and earlier allows local users or remote malicious POP3 servers to execute arbitrary code via a length value of -1, which leads to a zero byte memory allocation and a buffer overflow. • http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a&anuncio=000925 http://secunia.com/advisories/13830 http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200501-35.xml http://securitytracker.com/id?1012981 http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-673 http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2005:024 http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-238.html http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-397.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12354 https://exchange.xforce. • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 1

The camel component for Ximian Evolution 1.0.x and earlier does not verify certificates when it establishes a new SSL connection after previously verifying a certificate, which could allow remote attackers to monitor or modify sessions via a man-in-the-middle attack. El componente camel de Ximian Evolution 1.0.x y anteriores no verifica certificados cuando establece una conexión SSL nueva después de haberlo verificado anteriormente, lo que podría permitir a atacantes remotos monitorizar o modificar sesiones mediante un ataque de 'hombre en el medio' • http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2002-10/0045.html http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/10292.php http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5875 •