Page 30 of 258 results (0.008 seconds)

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

Inconsistent data in instruction and data cache when creating wasm code could lead to a potentially exploitable crash.<br>*This bug only affects Firefox on ARM64 platforms.*. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 102.3, Thunderbird < 102.3, and Firefox < 105. Los datos inconsistentes en las instrucciones y en el caché de datos al crear código wasm podrían provocar un fallo potencialmente explotable.<br>*Este error solo afecta a Firefox en plataformas ARM64.*. • https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1777604 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-40 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-41 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-42 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-40957 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128796 • CWE-240: Improper Handling of Inconsistent Structural Elements •

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

When injecting an HTML base element, some requests would ignore the CSP's base-uri settings and accept the injected element's base instead. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 102.3, Thunderbird < 102.3, and Firefox < 105. Al inyectar un elemento base HTML, algunas solicitudes ignorarían la configuración de uri base del CSP y aceptarían la base del elemento inyectado. Esta vulnerabilidad afecta a Firefox ESR &lt; 102.3, Thunderbird &lt; 102.3 y Firefox &lt; 105. A flaw was found in Mozilla. • https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1770094 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-40 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-41 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-42 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-40956 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128795 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') CWE-1021: Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames •

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

If a Thunderbird user replied to a crafted HTML email containing a <code>meta</code> tag, with the <code>meta</code> tag having the <code>http-equiv="refresh"</code> attribute, and the content attribute specifying an URL, then Thunderbird started a network request to that URL, regardless of the configuration to block remote content. In combination with certain other HTML elements and attributes in the email, it was possible to execute JavaScript code included in the message in the context of the message compose document. The JavaScript code was able to perform actions including, but probably not limited to, read and modify the contents of the message compose document, including the quoted original message, which could potentially contain the decrypted plaintext of encrypted data in the crafted email. The contents could then be transmitted to the network, either to the URL specified in the META refresh tag, or to a different URL, as the JavaScript code could modify the URL specified in the document. This bug doesn't affect users who have changed the default Message Body display setting to 'simple html' or 'plain text'. • https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1784838 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-38 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-39 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-3033 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123256 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

Mozilla developers Nika Layzell, Timothy Nikkel, Sebastian Hengst, Andreas Pehrson, and the Mozilla Fuzzing Team reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 104 and Firefox ESR 102.2. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 102.3, Thunderbird < 102.3, and Firefox < 105. Los desarrolladores de Mozilla, Nika Layzell, Timothy Nikkel, Sebastian Hengst, Andreas Pehrson y Mozilla Fuzzing Team informaron sobre errores de seguridad de la memoria presentes en Firefox 104 y Firefox ESR 102.2. Algunos de estos errores mostraron evidencia de corrupción de memoria y suponemos que con suficiente esfuerzo algunos de ellos podrían haberse aprovechado para ejecutar código arbitrario. • https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1776655%2C1777574%2C1784835%2C1785109%2C1786502%2C1789440 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-40 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-41 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-42 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-40962 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128797 • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

By injecting a cookie with certain special characters, an attacker on a shared subdomain which is not a secure context could set and thus overwrite cookies from a secure context, leading to session fixation and other attacks. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 102.3, Thunderbird < 102.3, and Firefox < 105. Al inyectar una cookie con ciertos caracteres especiales, un atacante en un subdominio compartido que no es un contexto seguro podría establecer y, por lo tanto, sobrescribir cookies desde un contexto seguro, lo que provocaría la fijación de sesiones y otros ataques. Esta vulnerabilidad afecta a Firefox ESR &lt; 102.3, Thunderbird &lt; 102.3 y Firefox &lt; 105. A flaw was found in Mozilla. • https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1779993 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-40 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-41 https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2022-42 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-40958 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128794 • CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') CWE-784: Reliance on Cookies without Validation and Integrity Checking in a Security Decision •