CVSS: 4.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3318
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3318
CA Common Services, as used in CA Client Automation r12.5 SP01, r12.8, and r12.9; CA Network and Systems Management r11.0, r11.1, and r11.2; CA NSM Job Management Option r11.0, r11.1, and r11.2; CA Universal Job Management Agent; CA Virtual Assurance for Infrastructure Managers (aka SystemEDGE) 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, and 12.9; and CA Workload Automation AE r11, r11.3, r11.3.5, and r11.3.6 on UNIX, does not properly validate an unspecified variable, which allows local users to gain privileges via unknown vectors. CA Common Services, utilizado en CA Client Automation r12.5 SP01, r12.8, y r12.9; CA Network and Systems Management r11.0, r11.1, y r11.2; CA NSM Job Management Option r11.0, r11.1, y r11.2; CA Universal Job Management Agent; CA Virtual Assurance for Infrastructure Managers (también conocido como SystemEDGE) 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, y 12.9; y CA Workload Automation AE r11, r11.3, r11.3.5, y r11.3.6 en UNIX, no valida correctamente una variable no especificada, lo que permite a usuarios locales ganar privilegios a través de vectores desconocidos. • http://www.ca.com/us/support/ca-support-online/product-content/recommended-reading/security-notices/ca20150604-01-security-notice-for-ca-common-services.aspx http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75033 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032512 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032513 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 4.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 21EXPL: 0CVE-2015-3316
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-3316
CA Common Services, as used in CA Client Automation r12.5 SP01, r12.8, and r12.9; CA Network and Systems Management r11.0, r11.1, and r11.2; CA NSM Job Management Option r11.0, r11.1, and r11.2; CA Universal Job Management Agent; CA Virtual Assurance for Infrastructure Managers (aka SystemEDGE) 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, and 12.9; and CA Workload Automation AE r11, r11.3, r11.3.5, and r11.3.6 on UNIX, allows local users to gain privileges via an unspecified environment variable. CA Common Services, utilizado en CA Client Automation r12.5 SP01, r12.8, y r12.9; CA Network and Systems Management r11.0, r11.1, y r11.2; CA NSM Job Management Option r11.0, r11.1, y r11.2; CA Universal Job Management Agent; CA Virtual Assurance for Infrastructure Managers (también conocido como SystemEDGE) 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, y 12.9; y CA Workload Automation AE r11, r11.3, r11.3.5, y r11.3.6 en UNIX, permite a usuarios locales ganar privilegios a través de una variable de entorno no especificada. • http://www.ca.com/us/support/ca-support-online/product-content/recommended-reading/security-notices/ca20150604-01-security-notice-for-ca-common-services.aspx http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75033 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032512 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032513 •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 97%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2015-4000 – LOGJAM: TLS connections which support export grade DHE key-exchange are vulnerable to MITM attacks
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-4000
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. El protocolo TLS 1.2 y anteriores, cuando una suite de cifrado DHE_EXPORT está habilitada en un servidor pero no en un cliente, no transporta una elección DHE_EXPORT, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle realizar ataques de degradación del cifrado mediante la rescritura de un ClientHello con DHE remplazado por DHE_EXPORT y posteriormente la rescritura de un ServerHello con DHE_EXPORT remplazado por DHE, también conocido como el problema 'Logjam'. A flaw was found in the way the TLS protocol composes the Diffie-Hellman exchange (for both export and non-export grade cipher suites). An attacker could use this flaw to downgrade a DHE connection to use export-grade key sizes, which could then be broken by sufficient pre-computation. This can lead to a passive man-in-the-middle attack in which the attacker is able to decrypt all traffic. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/sendmail_advisory2.asc http://fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-07-09-cve-2015-1793-openssl-alternative-chains-certificate-forgery http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04876402 http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04949778 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10681 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoC • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 240EXPL: 0CVE-2014-7810 – Tomcat/JbossWeb: security manager bypass via EL expressions
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-7810
The Expression Language (EL) implementation in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.44, 7.x before 7.0.58, and 8.x before 8.0.16 does not properly consider the possibility of an accessible interface implemented by an inaccessible class, which allows attackers to bypass a SecurityManager protection mechanism via a web application that leverages use of incorrect privileges during EL evaluation. La implementación Expression Language (EL) en Apache Tomcat 6.x anterior a 6.0.44, 7.x anterior a 7.0.58, y 8.x anterior a 8.0.16 no considera correctamente la posibilidad de una interfaz accesible implementada por una clase no accesible, lo que permite a atacantes evadir un mecanismo de protección SecurityManager a través de una aplicación web que aprovecha el uso de privilegios incorrectos durante la evaluación EL. It was found that the expression language resolver evaluated expressions within a privileged code section. A malicious web application could use this flaw to bypass security manager protections. • http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=145974991225029&w=2 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1621.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1622.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0492.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2046.html http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1644018 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1645642 http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html http://tomcat.apach • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •
CVSS: 8.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2014-7879
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-7879
HP HP-UX B.11.11, B.11.23, and B.11.31, when the PAM configuration includes libpam_updbe, allows remote authenticated users to bypass authentication, and consequently execute arbitrary code, via unspecified vectors. HP HP-UX B.11.11, B.11.23, y B.11.31, cuando la configuración PAM incluye libpam_updbe, permite a usuarios remotos autenticados evadir la autenticación, y como consecuencia ejecutar código arbitrario, a través de vectores no especificados. • https://h20564.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c04511778 • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •